Is he right?

nope

okay this is it. this is the definitive push from the nest that i've been anticipating. i used to have hope for /mu/. i used to think that despite its current condition it could get better. I used to think that grimesposting was something that would either burn itself out, or get snuffed by enough sensible anons questioning its calamitous omnipresence. i've been desperately holding onto this glimmer of hope for nearly two years, but now, as i look out onto the devastated wreckage of the catalogue, as i see the smoldering remains of a place that used to bring me joy, i can say with certainty that there is no future for me here. that my precious fragment of hope was nothing more than a mirage formed in the tumultuous blaze of impurity and degeneracy.

the grimesfags are not even human anymore. they have become a hideous manifestation of all that is vile and immoral. and after two years of fighting their unrelenting presence i've come to the realization that they cannot be stopped.

/mu/ is doomed to perish in the flames of perverse tyranny. to be swallowed by the disgusting assemblage of those who embody degeneracy. and with this bitter acceptance of defeat i will take my leave. i will abandon this barge as it sinks into the depths of hell before i find myself dragged down with it.

goodbye /mu/. may God have mercy on the souls of those who stay, and may judgement be passed upon the singularity of depravity that is the grimesfags.

You should probably delete this

>>73851289
they may want to save that last delete because they already deleted too many

one of the few times i disagree with scaruffi

>>73851277
this but unironically

Nah, Grimes is way too simple and straightforward to truly be surreal. Surreal dance pop would be Ariel Pink/James Ferraro or Eccojams or if techno counts, the more weirder stuff Terrence Dixon does where his rhythm play and stereo sounds make sorta like the Trout Mask equivalent of techno.

>>73851277
Filter it you retard?

>>73851244
>Chinese-opera inspired Oblivion

Really?

>>73851384
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPYKQhsx_HQ

>>73851352
>Terrence Dixon
I am so glad to see him mentioned here, criminally underappreciated

>>73851852
literally who?

>>73851244
>sensuale e infantile

You're siding with the opinion of a known pedophile and contrarian just because it goes along with your shitty narrative.

>>73851352
good stuff anon.