/grimes/

AA > H > GP >>>>>>>> V

>>73826721
V that low? You must be joking. That's her best album.

>>73826709
What happened to her lip

File: 14583099990790.jpg (50KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1080x720px

>>73826709
I'm happy to be alive in the times of Grimes.

>>73826808
it has a lipstick on it

File: grimespoll.jpg (70KB, 741x1054px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 741x1054px

How does it feel to know you have bad taste in music?

>inb4 everybody here is just a pleb and I'm patrician for listening to pop music anyways
>inb4 everybody who dislikes her cheated the poll even though none of them give 2 shits worth of their time to do that

>>73826808
idk but i like it

>>73826721
V >= AA >= H >> GP

>>73826808
Please explain this to a random guy

File: 14564129089251.jpg (231KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1080x1349px

>>73826910
>How does it feel to know you have bad taste in music?
Why are you asking this in a Grimes thread? We listen to the artist of this decade, so you better address this question to the haters.

>>73826910
Stop. That poll is corrupted. Many haters used that opportunity to mass VPN vote. Even the OP admitted his wicked tricks.

To rely on that dumb poll is like relying on the exit polls of the last US elections, LMAO.

>>73826910
see
>>73822964
>>73825603

>>73826910
>though none of them give 2 shits worth of their time to do that
if so then why do you still spend your time on posting this shit?

>>73826910
I don't care what other people dislike. I care what I like. Be autistic elsewhere.

>>73826961
q.e.d. That poll >>73826910 is faker than silicone implants.

>>73826946
>>73826961
/mu/ has way more than 150 users at a time, you're just too ashamed to admit that

keep claiming that OP was cheating and that people were VPNing though, there is no proof to that besides what you say

>>73826974
it's a grimes thread and this is from last night so I figured it fit the discussion

For REAL THOUGH, do you really care if you are the minority on this board? She just isn't for everyone

File: KYS.gif (635KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

635KB, 500x281px

>>73826910
I'm not sure what's worse.
>forged poll
>your lame ass re-posting forged poll
here's a hint
(YOU)

File: ratings-gr.png (344KB, 1858x1708px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1858x1708px

>>73826945
>We listen to the artist of this decade

AHAHAHAHHAHA!!!

Wake up from your delusion, sheeple.

>>73826989
How exactly can a poll be "fake"?

You sound like idiots from /pol/ when they were defending "fake" polls that gave their little Trumpy less votes than Hillary. Just listen to yourself, ffs

>>73826896
Lol

File: murules.png (11KB, 485x245px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 485x245px

>>73826709
Stop flooding the board with duplicate threads

Real one:
>>73826263
>>73826263
>>73826263

>>73827011
is your screenshot supposed to be an argument for something?

>>73827026
>How exactly can a poll be "fake"?
fake votes

>>73827006
>/mu/ has way more than 150 users at a time
Yet have you ever seen them posting to a single thread all together? Checkmate, autist.

>>73827054
that can't be proven in any way besides

>muh numbers went up really fast even though it was only 150 in one and a half hours

it's over, /mu/ hates grims

>>73827069
yes I have, and this board also has an innumerable amount of lurkers, you fucking retarded conspiracist

>>73827006
Just stop trying to bring that fake poll. It's not even worthy of discussion. Basically an autist decided to make a poll and he and other autists used VPNs and voted multiple times. They weren't even subtle about it. They wanted a revenge against her fans.

Taking about bias: most Grimesfans weren't even aware of that dumb poll. And I'm sure some of them even voted negatively because they don't want her to be liked by this dumb board. I voted negatively too.

>>73827069
Holy shit, KPOP threads alone have 70-80 unique posters. If /mu/ had less than 150 daily users, this means that majority of the board posts in KPOP threads? Double checkmate, atheist.

>>73827099
>keep claiming everyone was cheating when there is no proof instead of discussing the new statistic

lol k

File: 1499602382038.png (71KB, 905x510px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 905x510px

>>73827011
>implying some shitty rym ratings are objective
>implying rym isn't infested with moo-tants
LMAO! Try harder, sheep.

>>73827040
This.

>>73827099
>they don't want her to be liked by this dumb board.

This is the untruest fact ever stated in this general. If that was that case, how come Grimesfans use every single opportunity to spam her in any thread related to female musicians and try to make /mu/ like her and tell them to "be nice to her"? Seems counter-productive, doesn't it?

>>73827141
They just want to express their opinion. They believe that but they don't expect you to agree with their views.

As a matter of fact what are you doing here if you dislike her? You doth protest too much.

>>73827141
You know what you're doing

>>73826910
See that green area? Those are dem plebs hating her patrician music. In the red-orange area are the patricians. If you think about it, it makes sense. In any society, the plebs are over 80% and the remaining ones are the patricians.

Sure, now the plebs will whine they're not plebs. That futile attempt will fool no one. You actually shot yourself in the foot with that poll.

>>73827040
This, why was this one even created? Do we need 10 generals about the same artist?

>>73827100
>Holy shit, KPOP threads alone have 70-80 unique posters. If /mu/ had less than 150 daily users, this means that majority of the board posts in KPOP threads? Double checkmate, atheist.
Holy shit, you are retarded for real. A SINGLE THREAD would never get such attention in 10-20 MINUTES. Is it clear for you now, moron?

File: poll.jpg (76KB, 741x1054px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 741x1054px

>>73827026
>How exactly can a poll be "fake"?

>>73827288
The other thread is a troll thread. Hint: the ugly OP manipulated picture.
>>73827352
Fake votes. You morons couldn't even wait a little to VPN vote. Now you do damage control. No one takes that dumb fake poll seriously. Now gtfo.

>>73827352
>20 posters in that thread
>325 total votes.

Nooo, you won't fool anyone. Fukc off now.

>>73827074
/mu/ loves grimes so we discuss her
if you don't then why are you here?

>>73826910
>none of them give 2 shits worth of their time to do that
>he keeps posting the poll itt and in other threads
Apparently you give a shit. Quite too much for a mere hater.

>>73827457
>20 posters in that thread
Proof?

>That poll is fake hurr durr!

>>>/pol/

>>73827087
>yes I have
proof or GTFO

>>73827503
>>>/trash/

File: poll1.png (16KB, 655x286px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 655x286px

Reminder

File: poll2.png (15KB, 655x364px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 655x364px

>>73827546

>>73827546
Stop. That poll is corrupted. Many haters used that opportunity to mass VPN vote. Even the OP admitted his wicked tricks.

I don't care what other people dislike. I care what I like. Be autistic elsewhere.

That poll is faker than silicone implants.

I'm not sure what's worse.
>forged poll
>your lame ass re-posting forged poll
here's a hint
(YOU)

Fake votes. You morons couldn't even wait a little to VPN vote. Now you do damage control. No one takes that dumb fake poll seriously. Now gtfo.

Nooo, you won't fool anyone. Fukc off now.

>>73827026
The exit polls were lying, that's the point. They said one thing and the reality was another. Same thing for this shitty poll: it's a bag full of (VPN) lies. It's not legit. Period.

>>73827585
>That poll is corrupted.
proof, fucker?

>>73827074
>it's over, /mu/ hates grims
FIFY: a minority of dumb and very vocal haters hate Grimes. Nothing surprising.

>>73827457
From those 20, at least 3 were Grimesfans. These haters are really shameless bastards. They want to pass a big lie as a fact. It's a travesty.

File: 1499370689471.gif (4MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 480x270px

You know what's funny about this poll-gate? It proves nothing. Once Grimey will release her next masterpiece they will see who really is this artist. When they will see the whole catalog flooded with the cover of her new album they will remember their fake poll. Like most exit polls, this poll has nothing in common with reality.

Haters: cry some more crocodile tears.

>>73827952
Can't wait

>>73827952
who is this guy and why is he wearing a dress?

File: _.jpg (47KB, 396x594px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 396x594px

>>73828012
>guy
>can't tell the difference between a boy and a girl
Ho do you even function?

SLOTH

>>73828088
(You)

>>73828039
>girl
flatter than a pancake
I 've seen trannies with more upper

>>73828109
>I 've seen trannies
Gtfo pervert

>>73826808
She knee-ed herself in the face a couple weeks ago while jumping off a DJ stand in Japan.

>>73826910
>How does it feel to know you have bad taste in music?
Great, because /mu's taste in music sucks.

File: 1498982367307.png (74KB, 300x256px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 300x256px

>>73828109
>I 've seen trannies
------------------>>/b/

>>73828277
/mu/ btfo to pieces. This stinky board likes mostly crap like Kanye, DG, Swans, memerap, American Football etc etc. /mu/ sucks!

>>73828381
>implying any of those artists are bad
Sorry that you can't get into music outside of entry-level "experimental" pop

>>73827100
>If /mu/ had less than 150 daily users, this means that majority of the board posts in KPOP threads?
Wait a second - are you saying that the above sentence is news to you? Of course KPop are the single most active large contingent of posters in this board. Why do you think they go through threads so quickly?

File: 1154105.jpg (92KB, 747x748px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 747x748px

So... how do we deal with obsessive haters?

>>73828396
>experimental
That crap is supposed to be experimental? Ha ha ha ha ha ha!

>>73828396
>spotted the fan of bad music

>>73828445
Keep autistically raiding polls that show that she isn't for everybody, so that everybody will soon see that she is the best artist of the decade!

>>73828452
You can call it bad as much as you want, but all of them are objectively experimental

>>73828473
Spotted the pleb

File: Claire-Boucher-Feet-2051416.jpg (358KB, 932x1024px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 932x1024px

>>73828445
just ignore/hide all obvious baits

>>73828445
Report/ignore rule-breaking posts and carry on with actual music discussion relating to Grimes' music.

File: img.png (11KB, 1061x114px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 1061x114px

>>73826910
You. Were. BTFO.

>>73828497
>>73828574

>>73828574
Regardless of whether that's true or not (/mu/ is not that slow-moving of a board, especially on a Saturday night), why is the number of fans so low?

>>73828445
This>>73828507
and bait them into making an ass of themselves.

>>73828499
>Spotted the pleb
>he implies he's patrician for liking shitty unlistenable muh experimental drivel
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

>>73828591
>why is the number of fans so low?
Because Grimes is between albums. There's not much activity now and most of her fans have better things to do than vote in a stupid poll. Do that poll once she releases new music and see the difference.

>>73828612
>unlistenable
>can't even get through Swans, baby's first experimental
Are all grimesfags this close-minded? Swans is downright catchy most of the time, if the heaviness of the instrumentals are really too much, then there's no hope for you. Hell, even Grimes has better taste then you.

>>73828635
>somehow the amount of people will raise when she makes new music
I have no reason to believe you but we'll find out then

File: 1498826986851.png (3MB, 1384x1264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1384x1264px

>>73828604
Good plan.

>>73828591
>why is the number of fans so low?
see
https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/mu/thread/73817986/#73819752
Why on Earth would I - an actual fan of Grimes' music - want it to be positively associated with this place?

>>73828736
That post only suggests that one person voted a lot AGAINST Grimes. If she really is well-liked here, I imagine that at least a few more than 20 people (who voted before you made that post) would vote for Grimes

>>73828661
>Are all grimesfags
Who?

>>73828661
>Swans is downright catchy most of the time, if the heaviness of the instrumentals are really too much, then there's no hope for you
Wot? That shit isn't catchy. And their lyrics are edgy as fuck. I'd prefer some good experimental stuff like Delia Derbyshire, Laurie Anderson, Ulver, Kate Bush's weirder albums, Ozric Tentacles, Scott Walker, Art of Noise, Brian Eno, Autechre, Can, Silver Apples, Steve Reich. This is good stuff, not that crap.

But whatever floats you boat. You already have your taste validated by this dumb board, why my opinion should matter to you?

>>73828736
If you don't associate with /mu/, then you rightly didn't vote and you don't belong in the poll. That argument is over now lol. The poll only shows what the average person browsing /mu/ thinks of grimes

>>73828661
>Swans is downright catchy most of the time
Do you call this bullshit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7Dp9WNgX08 catchy? It's no wonder you don't get Grimes. She's too melodic for your brain accustomed to noisy crap.

>>73828768
>That post only suggests that one person voted a lot AGAINST
Where in that post did I say that I think I'm the only intelligent person on this board? And did you miss the multiple voting part?

>>73828661
>somehow the amount of people will raise when she makes new music
Actually yes. After AA was released her fanbase more than doubled. The signs are here. If she manages to have daily general threads when there's silence how do you think it will be when she will release a new album?

>>73828779
>that shit isn't catchy?
Have you heard Oxygen or Screen Shot? Both have very memorable riffs that make the basis of them.
>and their lyrics are edgy as fuck
You really judge an artist on their lyrics and dismiss things as "edgy". Why am I not surprised
>I'd prefer some good experimental stuff like Scott Walker
Wait, you really like Bish Bosch and shit but you can't even into Swans? Wew.

>>73828775
Grimesfags are people that like Grimes, although I'm probably replying to bait

>>73828768
I voted against her too. I knew that poll is just a sad joke.
>I imagine that at least a few more than 20 people (who voted before you made that post) would vote for Grimes
The things moved too fast. Also the fans that were at that moment didn't give a shit about a random poll. They're not your puppets to do what you expect.

>>73828823
So there were ten fans on here after Visions was released? Ok. Maybe the amount of people interested in her will rise, but when her new album comes out shitty, I doubt people will like her any more.

>>73828780
>If you don't associate with /mu/, then you rightly didn't vote
The poll wasn't hosted on /mu, dumb dumb. /mu doesn't have official polls.

>The poll only shows
Whatever me (or people more malicious than I) want it to show, because that is how easily fooled polls on the internet work.

>>73828828
>can't even into Swans
It's not that I can't get into them, it's about the fact I dislike their music, their lyrics, their aesthetic, their covers, their frontman. Overrated crap.
>You really judge an artist on their lyrics and dismiss things as "edgy". Why am I not surprised
Their lyrics are very edgy and I'm not even a religious person. How someone could enjoy that filthy crap is beyone me.

>>73828779
Kys tasteless pleb

>>73828828
>Grimesfags are people that like Grimes
Are you fourteen?

>>73828858
Cool, so far we know that a few people voted against her and not for her. Since you can't prove your claims that most people did, I'm fine believing that most people here don't like her music, which already seems obvious based on the posts about her.

>>73828903
>their lyrics are very edgy and I'm not a religious person
How young are you? Does harsh language offend you?

>>73828923
See above, if you're seriously offended by a decade-old meme then you might as well kill yourself now

>>73828859
>when her new album comes out shitty
You wish. I'm confident she will release a really amazing album. Anything less than good is unacceptable to her.

File: 1459644990961.jpg (1MB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x1000px

fuck all the haters, i love grimey and her music

>>73828994
Based on the direction she's been taking with the last two albums, it's going to be shit again, unless she makes a radical change.

>>73828968
>Does harsh language offend you?
Not really. But their lyrics are disgusting. Why should I listen to that shit? I have better things to do. e.g. Listen to some sweet music - Circumambient.

>>73829019
>their lyrics are disgusting
So, yes

>>73829016
WTF are you talking about? Her last 2 albums are her best ones so far. You just don't like poppier music, that's all. You may hate her future music but that doesn't mean she will do music to please your taste. You still have her first 2 albums.

>>73829019
>If someone could break your neck
>Coming up behind you always coming and you'd never have a clue

Good thing Grimes doesn't have disgusting, harsh lyrics

>>73829106
>you just don't like poppier music
>this bullshit again

>>73828912
>can't handle my awesome taste in music

>>73829019
It appears to me you only heard Filth. Have you listened to their 2010's output? It's mostly instrumental (and great instrumentation btw)

>>73828968
>Since you can't prove your claims that most people did, I'm fine believing that most people here don't like her music, which already seems obvious based on the posts about her.
/mu/ have a big problem with her. Grimes stands against their own culture of misogyny, sexism, memes, hatred, elitism*. She's like an enclave on /mu/.

* e.g. she likes Mariah Carey, Bieber and Rihanna, persona non grata on /mu/.

>>73829124
Because you said that shitty argument again. Seriously, what is wrong with Visions and AA? The singing, songwiritng and production are far superior to her early work. She improved on every level and yet you're saying her newer music is shit. Why?

>>73829138
>Have you listened to their 2010's output?
No.

File: g5HLgFV0.jpg (89KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 800x1000px

>>73829110
That's an exception. Most of her lyrics are poetic.

>>73829289
(continued)
It's an exception because that song is about a bad thing that happened to her. The reality was harsh to her for some years in her life.

>In your videos this year, you played with these clichés of powerful and powerless female archetypes. What was that about?
>I was interested in the Japanese archetype of a female protagonist who is very small and very cute and very physically powerful. You don’t see that archetype in America. But in Japanese culture, there are female characters who can embody this girl uniform and still cut someone’s head off with a sword. “Oblivion” embodies that kind of archetype, going into this masculine world that is associated with sexual assault, but presented as something really welcoming and nice. The song’s sort of about being — I was assaulted and I had a really hard time engaging in any types of relationship with men, because I was just so terrified of men for a while.

>Is it important for you to discuss what “Oblivion” is about?
>It would be intense if it were an overwhelming part of my image. I can’t censor myself; it’s really important for me to say how I feel. I needed to put out this song. I needed to make this song. I took one of the most shattering experiences of my life and turned it into something I can build a career on and that allows me to travel the world. I play it live every night. The whole process has been positive — engaging with that subject matter and making it into something good.

>>73829016
The problem is not her direction, the problem is that you just don't like it.

Why are grimesfags so annoying?

>>73830503
They are 15-year-old masturbating kids that will spend their whole summer fighting with people over their waifu. Sad if you think about it.

>>73826808
my dick

>>73830503
>grimesfags
Better question: why are you so annoying? They're just in self defense mode against this stupid board.

Don't let this thread die

>>73830559
That's what actually haters are doing. BTW, all this hateposting increased once the summer has come. Really makes you think who is actually 15-year-old here.

File: grim.png (12KB, 541x623px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 541x623px

Did you know that our Grimes likes Broadcast?

>>73830769
This

>>73830608
>this stupid board
If you hate it so much then leave. Nobody wants you here

>>73830876
Is an ebin troll. You tangled with the master ruseman

>>73830876
I'm just an observer. I could leave anytime but I'm still lurking here to see pure stupidity. It's entertaining. Case in point: you.

I hope our Grimey is suffocating in her sleep

>>73831266
Fuckoffhater

>>73829209
>she improved on every level
All she did was remove anything interesting from her previous albums and added more radio-friendly songs that take away her charm

>>73828228
Lol

>>73830307
The problem is that I don't like the direction, yes, no shit. How stupid do you have to be to think that that needs to be pointed out?

>>73831372
If you don't like this direction then it is your problem, not hers. How stupid do you have to be to think that that needs to be pointed out? All her new stuff is great and superior and the new record will be even better.

>>73831442
>then it is your problem
Yes, that's how opinions work. Should I just stop sharing my opinions in threads dedicated to sharing opinions? You seem to be getting very worked up about other people disagreeing with you.

>>73831511
Saying that "the last two albums were shit" is not an opinion, it's an objectively incorrect statement.

>>73831582
how delusional are you?

>>73831582
>it's not an opinion
Unless you're going to spout off some bullshit like "hurt the albums aren't feces so they're not shit" then I have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

>>73831511
Grimes generals summed up in one post

>>73831613
?

>>73831582
Music is subjective, moron

>>73831344
That's like saying Kate Bush "removed anything interesting from her previous albums" when she did the radio friendly Hounds of Love and The Sensual World. Stop blaming pop music just because you don't like it.
>more radio-friendly songs that take away her charm
They still sound like Grimes. Do you honestly believe anyone else could have made something like Circumambient, Colour of Moonlight, Scream and Kill V. Maim?

>>73831657
Music is not shit, idiot.

>>73826910

alright guys listen up

grimes is washed up

art angels and all the money spent on pr and marketing for her and the project were a failure

she's shilling sample packs

get a clue

grimes never happened

>>73831675
>too stupid to realize that people are not calling an album fecal matter when they call it shit

>>73831661
But Kate didn't take away everything interesting about her when she made HoL, her good shit was still there. Grimes stripped away anything interesting and made a boring album with uninteresting instrumentals and her vocals especially annoying

>>73831675
Ever heard of SCREAM or Medieval Warfare?

>>73831675
>what are metaphores?

art angels is such a boring terrible album that i question how anyone could listen to it more than once and still care about this tryhard cunt

>>73831747
MW is great though

>>73831796
Exactly

>>73831768
you may say you don't like a song or album, but do not call it "shit" for no reason
be respectful to artists and their art

>>73831796
>be nice to grimes

>>73831737
>But Kate didn't take away everything interesting about her when she made HoL, her good shit was still there. Grimes stripped away anything interesting and made a boring album with uninteresting instrumentals and her vocals especially annoying
That's just your opinion. Lots of people loved her new direction. Her songs became catchier but they're still punching hard. Let's say someone liked Devon and My Sisters Says the Hardest Things from Halfaxa. I find hard to believe that someone would be unable to enjoy say Oblivion and Skin, or Realiti and Artangels. It's still synthpop, ffs, just a different kind.
>Grimes stripped away anything interesting
Be more specific: what exactly she stripped away? The synths, the lyrics, the beats, the voice, what?

>>73831724
>posts a bunch of lies
>expecting to be taken seriously
At least you tried.

>>73831747
They're both good songs, you're just too pleb to get into them.

>>73831905
no way dude.
you are spending waaaaaay too much time out of your life trying to defend her.

you can't tell me that you aren't some loser being paid to shill her on this board. they way you SELL her is absolutely atrocious and sickening and PATHETIC.

>>73831953
cont. the way you BULLY people into trying to like her.

"if you listen to so-and-so song again - it'll grow on you"

FUCK OFF. the album was boring. grimes is BORING dude.

File: 1498835053913.jpg (114KB, 770x781px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 770x781px

>>73831796
Hold on a second: why are you so mad, bro? Let's pretend AA is a boring album. A boring album would provoke a meh reaction at best. You seem genuinely disturbed by this album. You're in the denial phase: you reject even thinking about liking it. You're actually AFRAID TO LIKE IT. Right?

Don't fight it, feel it.

That you?

>>73831953
>>73831978
>moving the goalposts
That's my little pleasure, to defend her against the hordes of ignorants. Why do you have a problem with what I do with my free time? Are you an autist?
>FUCK OFF. the album was boring. grimes is BORING dude.
Whatever you say, pleb. Just try to be polite next time, asshole.

>>73831999
dude

art angels is boring

and no i don't want to listen to kill v maim again so that it grows on me

>>73831844
>for no reason
But the original anon didn't do that

>>73831905
>That's just your opinion
DING DING DING! The retard figured out the most obvious thing ever! Would you like a prize?

>>73831999
No, a boring album is a terrible album, a meh reaction would be caused by a mediocre album

>>73832050
How many times did you listen to it before making such a bold claim?
>>73832064
You're just a retard. Your "opinions" belong to trash. Bye.

>>73832048
there are other avenues on the internet where you can sell the grimes brand.

have you tried facebook? there are plenty of her fans on instagram and reddit? have you tried those?

i'm mean, really, wasting your life SELLING a failed indie buzz flavour-of-the-month for how many years?

here's a question for you:

how many years of your life have you wasted selling this failed brand?

and judging by the amount of "be nice to the brand" mixed in with broken english it's pretty obvious these "fans" are third world viral posters paid to post this crap on this board day in and day out.

File: image.jpg (175KB, 666x500px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 666x500px

>>73832098
Grimes is a strong brand. Even a dumbass like you wasted seconds from your useless life posting about someone you don't even like with ZERO results. That's a strong brand in action. Did your dumb posts change anything at all? Hint: nothing. Go sing at another table, no one wants to hear your bullshit anymore.

>>73832184
grimes is a strong brand my ass dude

you're a fucking joke

>>73832162
Yeah right. Are you mad because you're a shitty neet earning nothing? Gotcha!

>>73832200
Keep denying the evidence. You're still a naive fool. And keep wasting your pathetic life shitposting about an artist you don't even like.

you probably asked people to listen to the song again (hopefully on spotify) so that you can get a cut of the $0.0001 her team has to split for each play on there.

christ fuck off

>>73832217
what evidence?

lmao you're fucking NUTS bro

>>73832276
>christ fuck off
Even Jesus doesn't listen to a dipshit like you. You're THAT irrelevant.
>you probably asked people to listen to the song again (hopefully on spotify) so that you can get a cut of the $0.0001 her team has to split for each play on there.
Lmao! You read some conspiracy books and now you think you know shit, Sherlock?

>>73832295
>what evidence?

>grimes is a strong brand my ass dude
>Grimes is a strong brand. Even a dumbass like you wasted seconds from your useless life posting about someone you don't even like with ZERO results. That's a strong brand in action.
Now would you mind stopping pretending to be an idiot? Thanks.

>>73832048
>Why do you have a problem with what I do with my free time?
Because what you do with your free time happens to be an atrocious detriment to this board.

>>73828968
>which already seems obvious based on the posts
Which posts?

>>73828968
>a decade-old meme
Anon, just because it was cool to act like you were fourteen ten years ago when you first started posting here (most like because you WERE fourteen ten years ago) doesn't make you sound cool. It makes you sound like you are STILL fourteen - and this is an 18+ site...

>>73832097
>You're just a retard
I'll take that as an admission of "I'm wrong", thanks

>>73832362
>atrocious detriment to this board
>trying to shut my mouth
>trying to mess with my freedom of speech
Who the fuck do you think you are? Stop replying to me, dip, if you're so triggered by my smart posts.

>>73832367
>which posts
Most posts on this board when discussing Grimes outside of these generals are not positive

>if I keep repeating the "using a meme that offends my delicate sensibilities is underage" meme I'll eventually be correct
Keep telling yourself that

>>73831999
He's not reacting to the album. He's reacting to you being a cunt. Same as 90% of the "grimeshaters" on this board. They don't hate grimes. They hate you

>>73832378
>fooling himself
Whatever works for you

>>73831999
>You're in the denial phase: you reject even thinking about liking it. You're actually AFRAID TO LIKE IT.
it's because of shilling losers like you who are in the minority who try to convince me to like something that i find boring and uninteresting. people fight with you guys because you are irritating. i never had time to develop a positive opinion of her because of you grimesfags trying to bully people into liking her.

i literally hate this woman because of you twats.

>>73829124
>this bullshit again
Is it true? Do you tend to NOT like contemporary pop music?

>>73832442
*slow claps*

*steps out of the shadows*

Heh... not bad, kid. Not bad at all. Your meme, I mean. It's not bad. A good first attempt. It's plenty dank... I can tell it's got some thought behind it... lots of quotable material...

But memeing isn't all sunshine and rainbows, kid. You're skilled... that much I can tell. But do you have what it takes to be a Memester? To join those esteemed meme ranks? To call yourself a member of the Ruseman's Corps? Memeing takes talent, that much is true. But more than that it takes heart. The world-class Memesters - I mean the big guys, like Johnny Hammersticks and Billy Kuahana - they're out there day and night, burning the midnight meme-oil, working tirelessly to craft that next big meme.

And you know what, kid? 99 times out of a hundred, that new meme fails. Someone dismisses it as bait, or says it's "tryhard," or ignores it as they copy/paste the latest shitpost copypasta dreamt up by those sorry excuses for cut-rate memers over at reddit. The Meme Game is rough, kid, and I don't just mean the one you just lost :^). It's a rough business, and for every artisan meme you craft in your meme bakery, some cocksucker at 9gag has a picture of a duck or some shit that a million different Johnny No-Names will attach a milion different captions to. Chin up, kid. Don't get all mopey on me. You've got skill. You've got talent. You just need to show your drive.

See you on the boards...

>>73832414
>if you're so triggered by my smart posts.
Oh wow I just realized grimesfag is trolling. I can't believe it took me this long to figure that out

>>73830503
Probably because you have the mentality of a fourteen-year-old.

>>73830559
see
>>73832505

>>73832430
>They don't hate grimes.
>they still insults her daily
Yeah sure. Keep telling yourself that. Even this idiot >>73832442 said he hates her.

You just troll yoursleves, idiots. You post dumb controversial shit despite the fact you knew someone will kick your ass. After that you whine that Grimesfans are meanies. How about minding your business and stopping posting ITT? How about finding a more suitable thread for your shitposting? You stay here, you play by the threads' unwritten and written rules. The most important is to be nice to her.

File: grime_2017_dj_japan.webm (3MB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x480px

>>73831364
She supposedly almost lost some teeth out of it.

>>73832444
I'm not a big fan of contemporary pop music, definitely, but saying that I dislike poppy music is just retarded

>>73832653
She fixed them.

>>73832653
Sometimes I hate her but it's pretty cool that she jumped back up and kept going.

File: grimes_mu_obsession.png (107KB, 482x813px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 482x813px

>>73831613
A picture says a thousand words desu.

>>73832596
>you knew someone will kick your ass
Yeah you sure kicked my ass anon. Lol. Just hope you don't run into me irl (although that probably won't happen since you don't leave your moms house)

why does grimes still live in the same house she did four years ago?

you'd think she'd have upgraded to something more palatial with the 'success' of art angels

>>73832064
>No, a boring album is a terrible album, a meh reaction would be caused by a mediocre album
The purpose of art is to comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable. Bad art accomplishes neither. Good art accomplishes either one or the other for each individual viewer depending on that person's current psychological state.

>>73832757
>although that probably won't happen since you don't leave your moms house
Nice projecting. Still, you are mad irl. You know it's true.

>>73832943
Yes, so a boring as shit album is bad art (terrible art, in fact), and thus it makes sense to criticize it as such.

>>73832886
>palatial
That's probably why

>>73832943
there's nothing disturbing or comforting or innovative or magnificent or compelling about art angels.

it's just boring and only boring autistic one-track mind types can talk about it on a constant basis and make track reccs.

which song should i listen to again so that i feel it this time?

>>73832162
>these "fans"
You're responding exclusively to a single dude, anon.

>>73832991
You just have a boring taste, that's all. Give up.

>>73833030
i'd rather have boring taste... blah blah blah

you know where that one's goin

>>73832362
>atrocious detriment
Not that anon, but in comparison to what other content of this board is this ongoing retarded slugfest of YOURS with a Grimes fan atrocious?

>>73832162
How about suck my dick have you ever thought about that?

>>73832428
>Most posts on this board when discussing Grimes outside of these generals are not positive
Why do you take obvious shitposting/trolling so seriously? Are you ACTUALLY psychologically still fourteen?

>>73833058
Then why are you still here? OK, her music is boring to you, why don't you just leave? Why do you care about a boring artist?

File: hqdefault.jpg (18KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x360px

Guys help!!! I tried listening to Kill V Maim this morning and I'm not feeling it! What other songs should I listen to? Help!

>>73833128
>it's trolling because they don't like my waifu
stay autistic

>>73833213
What kind of music do you prefer?

Ok dillema

ok so like i was totally taking a shit and listening to art angels and wasn't feeling it

i'm just getting into grimes

what should i listen to first?

>>73833273
the shit that you were taking was Art Angels lmao

>>73826910
that fucking shit is fake and you know it was corrupted, fucktard!

>>73832596
>you stay here, you play by the threads' unwritten and written rules. The most important is to be nice to her.

You can't make people be nice to her anon. The "rules" you're talking about don't actually exist. It is completely within the realms of /mu/'s actual rules for me to say I think grimes is worthless shit. There's nothing you can do to stop me from posting this, and every time you try to micromanage this shit as if you had some kind of authority here (you don't) you're going to make me want to express my opinion more. So just get used to the fact that not everyone is going to be nice to her, nor does anybody have to.

Why do you let hostility towards her trigger you so much anyways? Just get over it already

>>73833273
Stop trolling, you idiot.
>>73833303
You too.

>>73827127
>5th best album
>5th
>of 2015
>artist of the decade
LMFAOOOO

>>73833308
>this mad because other anons don't like his shitty artist

>>73833386
>It is completely within the realms of /mu/'s actual rules for me to say I think grimes is worthless shit.
You may say whatever shit you want. But don't expect reasonable people to agree with your dumb posts. Your dumb posts will be challenged. Better be prepared to justify your stupid actions.

>>73832430
>They don't hate grimes. They hate you
Not the anon you're conversing with. But if what you say here is really true (that most of the Grimes "hate" on /mu right now is actually just a result of certain posters not liking other - most likely newer - posters) then these fake "grimeshaters" are just gonna end up either leaving /mu under their own volition (the smart ones) or eventually getting kicked off of /mu, because trolling (including that directed at other posters) is against board rules.

Pro-tip: When posting on what you hate about /mu becomes more important to you than posting about what music you like, that's how you know you've been here too long and need to move on.

>>73833405
Are you blind? There are some #1s too.

*filters grimes*

>>73832442
see
>>73833434

>i literally hate this woman because of you twats.
That just makes you a tool, desu. A sad tool, at that.

>>73833457
Good. If you hate her you did the right thing. Much better than whining.

>>73833444
>some
I would expect an artist of the decade to have more
plus those publications are shit

>>73833422
>Better be prepared to justify your stupid actions.
Nah. I'm gonna go do something else. I'll just let that sit for people to reflect on

>>73832442
Pathetic. Why don't you just move over? Do you expect people to behave in the way you want? Are you so delusional?

>>73833509
Whatever. Just don't whine.
>>73833491
Do you realize that "the artist of the decade" is a subjective thing? Why do you expect all publications to put her at #1? Especially when she has such a strong competition from meme "talkers over a beat" like Kendrick and Kanye.

Name another artist able to have 2 parallel general threads at the same time. Go ahead.

>>73832983
>Yes, so a boring as shit album is bad art
Quite the opposite. Bad art has no effect on people. Good art does. Whether that effect is perceived as positive or negative is up to you. If Art Angels was truly bad art you wouldn't feel the need to critique it AT ALL - especially with such strong adjectives.

>>73833636
you are the worst salesman ever

>>73833631
does /mu/ really have mods?

>>73832991
>which song should i listen to again so that i feel it this time?
Probably none, since it's pretty clear that you've already arbitrarily decided that you don't like it. Learning how to enjoy new or different music requires having an open mind. If you can manage to have an open mind about it... probably the whole thing.

>>73833636
>especially with such strong adjectives.
boring is an adjective?

>>73833058
see
>>73833749

>>73833636
bad art has no effect on people, boring art has no effect on you. Thus, you critique it as bad art since it was uninteresting and did nothing for you. Since Art Angels is boring, and thus, bad art (very bad art), that anon felt the need to criticize it as such. Also, I see no reason why I should believe your metric for what makes art good. If it provokes either a bad reaction (to the music itself) or is uninteresting, then it's bad.

>>73833760
”boring as shit" is an adjective phrase, so yes.

i decided to listen to a grimes song on google play music for every hater in a /grimes/ thread. so far, the haters have made claire two dollars!

>>73833723
He's generally a smug smartass but he's right this time.

>>73833591
except those "meme talkers" are widely praised unlike your shitty cat piss smelling waifu

>>73833915
>he's right
>saying that a boring album (which has little to no affect on you) is not bad art (which is defined (by him) as art that has no affect on you)
t. him

>>73833793
>bad art has no effect on people
If something has no effect on you, then it can't be bad.

>>73833974
if it's purpose is to affect you and it fails to do so in any interesting way (or at all), then it failed it's purpose and is thus bad art

>>73826709
I hope grimes kills herself she's as worthless as her pop shit

>>73834055
jealous alert!! beep beep

>>73833240
see
>>73832430
90% of the "hatred" you see on here directed at Grimes actually has nothing to do with her.

>>73833954
Actually I'm not him. I just agree with that view. If an album has an effect on you it can't be bad. Maybe if you would give it more chances AA will grow on you.

>>73833912
That's nice. Which songs did you listen so far?

What is your motive? What could you possibly gain from ceaselessly trying to force her shitty music onto everyone else on this board every fucking day? The amount of time and effort that you put into this is inconceivable. And I cannot for the life of me figure out why..

>>73834055
Stop, Ricardo. Don't hurt her, you prick.

>>73834113
>it'll grow
balls

>>73833308
Would you tone it down a bit? Not everyone else here is interested in hearing about your meme fights.

>>73834113
So if you don't enjoy an album it can't be bad? What?

>>73834069
why should i believe one anon spouting off random numbers? her music and her fanbase are both unbearable

File: Grimes_Music_Chart.png (794KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

794KB, 3000x3000px

>>73833273
Try pic related.

>>73834273
>her music and her fanbase are both unbearable
Then why are you here if they're SO unbearable? Are you a masochist?

File: image1.png (42KB, 539x593px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 539x593px

Grimes about her creative process

>>73834364
they're unbearable to witness and in terms of not shitting up other threads but it's enjoyable to discuss shit with them, honestly. I just wished that they stayed in these threads

>>73834392
Why they should stay in just one thread? Don't you think it's really autistic to say to some grown up people to stay in just one thread because you wish that? What about freedom of speech and liberty?

>>73833919
Anon, what's with the kindergarten-level insults? Also ALL the artists mentioned are widely praised - warranted or not.

>>73834149
i've gone through art angels a couple dozen times (it's my favourite!) and then randomly picked between the other three albums, occasionally the demo tape too

>>73834167
This.

>>73834423
yikes. How embarrassing. You know this is an 18+ website, right?

>>73834423
I'll give you an example, last night there was a fun thread about the ITAOTS lady being the queen of /mu/. Within one fucking post, the grimesfags shit up the thread and changed the topic completely. Same thing happens for almost every thread about a female artist.

>>73834482
Not an argument. Answer those questions, don't move the goalposts.

File: pic.png (2KB, 316x38px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 316x38px

>>73834514
>shit up the thread
Wait a fucking minute: discussing an artist you hate = shitting up the thread? Troll logic.
That idiotic OP said
>This is the real Queen of /mu/. End of discussion.
End of discussion on the very first post? That's a troll thread right there.
You know what really stinks? The double standards. It's OK to you to troll people with bullshit statements but it's not OK to you when people fight back and troll you even harder. Deal with it hater.

>>73834649
>discussing an artist you hate = shitting up the thread
never said that, changing a thread topic to your favorite artist out of the blue (like in bjork and kate bush threads) is autistic and should be bannable, whether it's grimes or not. If you want to start a grimes thread, wait for the pre-existing one to die

>end of discussion
that's a meme, the OP was having a bit of fun. It took one reply for the topic of the whole thread to turn into an argument about whether Grimes is liked here (she's not)
>the double standards
no double standards here, you just have a victim complex

>>73834055
>not being nice to Grimes

>>73834736
and, to add, there are often simultaneous grimes threads going on, which is also bad and yet they never seem to get banned for it.

>>73834167
>What is your motive? What could you possibly gain from ceaselessly trying to force her shitty music
>why do people talk about music they like on internet forums devoted to the discussion of music

>>73834736
>never said that, changing a thread topic to your favorite artist out of the blue (like in bjork and kate bush threads) is autistic and should be bannable, whether it's grimes or not. If you want to start a grimes thread, wait for the pre-existing one to die
The topic could be changed out of the blue. Threads are fluid. People considered the OP shitposted and they turned the thread into a different direction. If you cared so much about the OP's INFORMATIVE topic, why didn't you contribute to discussions related to ITAOTS lady being the queen of /mu/??? Gotcha.
>that's a meme, the OP was having a bit of fun.
The Grimes-fans had a bit of fun too. Everyone had fun. See how easy it is?
>no double standards here, you just have a victim complex
So, you troll the people with a bold statement and an "end of discussion" at the end and then whine when other people derail your magificent shitposting thread? Lmao! Be thankful you weren't banned for shitposting.
>should be bannable
Rules are rules. Things don't happen according to your will.

so y'all just like this shit because its different right? someone says "oh i like lady gaga" and you get to respond with a trap card. "yeah well i like GRIMES" evil laughter fills the room etc etc

This shit is not even that good y'all are absolutely on drugs

>>73834867
>the topic could be changed out of the blue
and that's bullshit. if you're so desperate to discuss something, start a new thread for it, don't ruin other people's discussion of it
>why didn't you contribute to the discussions related to ITAOTS lady being the queen of /mu/???
I tried, but after 1 fucking post the topic devolved into whether or not goblin lady is well-liked on a mongolian sheep shaving board
>the grimesfags had a bit of fun too
they seemed awfully mad for them to be having fun, they would at least post a reasonable contender
>so you troll the people with a bold statement and an "end of discussion" at the end
how the fuck is a meme thread a troll thread? how sensitive are grimesfans really?
>and then whine when people derail your shitposting thread
it wasn't my thread (nor was it a shitposting thread), but i still would've preferred to meme around then witness a bunch of spergs invade a normal thread and turn it into another /grimes/
>rules are rules
yes, and i think they should be changed so better discussion can occur

>>73834273
>So if you don't enjoy an album it can't be bad?
It can't be bad ART (you can still dislike it) - by definition.

>>73834273
>why should i believe one anon spouting off random numbers
Because they're pretty accurate desu. Most shitposting/trolling is very easy to identify.

>>73834898
>stop liking what i don't even get
Pleb.

>>73834384
Interesting

>>73834967
Let's be real: you totally expected her fans to post on a fucking thread with "queen of /mu/" on its title. We all know that Grimes is the queen of /mu/. Don't act surprised, friendo.

>>73834469
see
>>73834847

>>73834514
>last night there was a fun thread about the ITAOTS lady being the queen of /mu/.
Anon, this is a music discussion forum - not a safespace for retarded memes.

>>73835032
>you totally expected it
fair enough, but I at least hoped that they wouldn't be autistic for once. Unfortunately, I was wrong

>>73834983
>by definition
define good and bad art then, it's all subjective. If we're going by that original anon's definition (it has to make you feel something), then a boring album (which makes you feel next to nothing) is bad art, which he seemed to not understand.

>>73835060
what's the fucking point in redirecting an anon who replied to a certain post to another reply to that same post? Don't you have anything better to do?

>>73835122
music-related memes fall under this board because this board is for music-related things. If you're going to pursue this argument, then why aren't you just as annoyed that the grimes-fans brought up her popularity here, which is also not music discussion directly? Please think before you post.

>memes are retarded because they can be misconstrued as a slight against my waifu
this is just sad

>>73834736
see
>>73835122

>changing a thread topic
Is a form of trolling, and is therefore a bannable offense. Report such posts and move on. Whining about it just encourages more trolling.

>>73835190
it's not trolling, it's a separate offense that also requires a rule.

>>73834847
>>why do people talk about music they like on internet forums devoted to the discussion of music
don't even try to pretend this is casual conversation anon

>>73835127
>define good and bad art then
I already did. >>73832943
Art itself is a process of mental transformation. Good art changes the way you think in some way. Bad art doesn't.

>a boring album
People who find an album truly boring don't go out of their way to discuss how "boring" they thought it was with groups of people who are almost guaranteed to disagree with them (e.g. the occupants of these threads.)

>>73828228
Hope it goes down

>>73835168
>music-related memes fall under this board because this board is for music-related things.
As per official board rules, /mu is for the discussion of
>music, artists, and instruments
http://www.4chan.org/rules#mu

>memes are retarded
Because they can be misconstrued to be about ANYTHING. And since this board is specifically for the discussion of
>music, artists, and instruments
Smart people avoid using memes since they invariably lead to thread derailment - exactly like what you saw in that ITAOTS "fun" thread last night.

>>73835604
if an album is boring, then it doesn't change the way that you think. Thus, a boring album is a bad album. People who really found the album boring will call it boring because they're discussing an artist's music in a thread about that artist.

>>73835785
>discussion of music, artists, and instruments
Yes, so discussing music-related things (for example, memes) is directly related to music.

>because they can be misconstrued to be about ANYTHING
yes, if you're obsessed with an artist and see her in every situation

>smart people avoid using memes because they invariably lead to thread derailment
No. Memes are a fun way of communication between people that help develop a board culture and more future enjoyment. That thread only led to thread derailment because of overly-obsessive grimesfans

>>73835858
>That thread only led to thread derailment because of overly-obsessive grimesfans

So, just you guys? Because you love doing this so much

>>73828098
(You) know it's true

Well I see these threads haven't improved at all. Still a barrel of sunshine in these parts.

Starting to not like her music based solely on the fanbase on these forums. I mean sure the trolls are irritating, but these threads and the continuous triggering is obnoxious.

It's at the point where I don't believe any sort of subjective/objective discussion about her work is possible here.

Someone says they don't like it because of x, someone comes and tells that person they are retarded or that they didn't listen properly or some bullshit.

Ah well. I'll check back later on I guess. Maybe. Whatever.

>>73835225
>it's not trolling,
trolling: the act of maliciously interfering with the free flow of information in a pre-existing thread of discussion.

Hijacking the topic of a thread (unless the topic is itself a meme since memes have fluid definitions) is a straightforward example of trolling. Report, move on, and - for God sakes - don't whine about it. Otherwise you just encourage more trolling.

>>73836055
This is a waste of your time

>>73828228
That was like a month ago.

>>73835858
>yes, if you're obsessed with an artist
No. Because memes have fluid definitions.

>>73830503
As a fan... slowly unbecoming a fan because of her fanbase, i'm wondering this myself.

>>73835858
>Memes are a fun way of communication between people
Who are like-minded. In the context of a place like /mu (where conversation is open to literally ANYONE) they just function as ways for people to derail conversations.

>>73831657
Agreed. Some people in these threads do not know how to allow other people to enjoy or not enjoy shit of their own choosing.

Nobody wants an echo chamber. If you do (if responder is OP) then make an echo chamber grimes thread.

>>73831724
Where are those sample packs? I'd look to find them if I knew what the fuck a sample pack was.

>>73831747
Scream was terrible. After that it gets going pretty good though.

>>73831844
They can call it whatever they want. It's their opinion. Just as you are free to call it "album of the decade" or whatever.

>>73832048
This is probably the most annoying thing that fellow fans are doing. What a disgrace. Her music should stand alone, she doesn't need you to "defend" anything.

Man sometimes I regret clicking on that youtube video. She makes great music but people like this... sigh... dammit man.

>>73836065
Where did you find an official dictionary entry for the word 'trolling' which would recodnize and legitimize it as a real word, like 'mansplain'?

I'm not saying it's wrong for you to be quoting user generated definitions of words from joke websites, but it makes you a fucking moron to do that thing. Just my opinion

>>73832097
Dude, that is so rude. I don't know how you can come in these threads and think you're helping.

I'm a fan of hers but man some of you people need to learn how to welcome other anons so they can enjoy her music too. Your attitude keeps them from bothering.

>>73836055
>Starting to not like her music based solely on the fanbase on these forums.
You must be a big idiot. Better leave.

>>73836135
>disliking something because there are stupid people on the internet who claim to like it
>>73836055
>>73836135
Anons, if this is how you judge things then you're just gonna end up automatically hating everything that ever becomes popular (because large groups always have some stupid people in them.)

>>73832886
She's likely used to being poor. So I don't think she knows/wants to upgrade much. I mean she lives in cali already which is rad af. Better weather than Quebec by a long shot.

Plus I think she's dumping her money into gear.

>>73836135
>letting a fanbase to influence your taste in music
You don't deserve her music if you're such an idiot

>>73836055
DUDE LISTEN TO KILL V MAIM A SECOND TIME!!! YOU'LL TOTES GET IT LOL!! XD

>>73836290
I like the cold, quebec sounds comfy

>>73836222
Then leave, crybaby.

>>73836222
see
>>73836289

>>73836274
Yeah because I want to spend my time in these threads arguing about who's an idiot but not about whether people like her music or what they like/don't like about it like a normal thread.

I'm the idiot. LOL.

Okay if that makes you feel better. Derp.

>>73836222
>What a disgrace.
But don't you see that dumbass' post, you deluded crybaby? Pick your dear trolls and get the fuck out of this thread if everything stinks to you.

>>73836289
No, it's only the grimes shit that seems to evoke these reactions and crazy people who believe one day she'll be their waifu. It's annoying as fuck.

Just discuss her music. WTf is wrong with some people? You're never going to be with her you dummies.

>>73836295
LOL Okay then. Hahahahahaha.

>>73836297
Too late, i've listened to it a hundred times. Oh shit!

>>73836290
Yeah there can't be a lot of high-end equipment that she could actually make good use out of. She probably goes into a crazy synth setup thinking it'll make good music by it's self

>>73836356
Maybe I will then. At least the trolls seem to know how to party and have a sense of humor. Instead of some of you humorless, waifu dolts.

Jesus what an annoying fan base. I thought some of you guys were cool. But now i'm thinking some of you might really need to see a mental health professional. Seriously.

>>73836339
You're an idiot for having such a big problem with her fanbase. NOT the trolls, her fanbase! I think you're just a troll undercover, you can't be this naive. All you do is to whine at her fanbase for "beating" your dear trolls, like those trolls are saints and not devils. Get a life dummy.

>>73836359
Please quote out all of the waifufags, this is your responsibility now

>>73836411
Yeah but it's not the entire fanbase. A lot of people are cool and normal sounding except there's this particular segment of this fan base that waifu's shit up and believes... seriously believes they're going to be with her and they use that hope to fuel their defense of her and any and all criticism. It's absolutely unbearable.

An artist should stand alone and be able to be judged solely on their merits. People who come to their defense or whatever don't improve anything. They're not going to change anyones mind. I don't understand how they think they're helping.

These threads need a commercial break

>>73836431
Well i'll just have to wait and see which one of them show up in this thread.

Million pictures guy, Grimey sleeping well, you're an idiot if you don't like her music guy, or the my opinion of music is better than your opinion of music guy... oh and the guy who printed out her photos and lit candles and shit while staring at them.

WTf.

>>73836400
All you do is whine, whine, whine. You're more tiring than trolls. Be a man and face the Grimesposting as it is, not as you want it to be. You should seek help for your paranoia.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1tj2zJ2Wvg

>>73836456
Who's the sponsor?

>>73836438
> seriously believes they're going to be with her and they use that hope to fuel their defense of her and any and all criticism
Nice projecting here

>>73836459
Nah see that's what I want to do, discuss her music. And there's too many of you cunts gumming up the works with your continued bickering with trolls (and legit fans) about how they're wrong if they don't like x song or whatever.

Get a grip. People can have a difference of opinion.

>>73836488
I ain't waiting around for her... are you?

>>73826709
HOLY SHIT!

NEW GRIMES SONG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcVzM-kgWWw

new bread: >>73836527

>>73836531
WTF was that?

>>73836411
>All you do is to whine at her fanbase
Different anon speaking. 90% of the problems rational people are having here with her "fanbase" are actually just problems they're having with you specifically. Stop being an asshole to EVERYONE (including people like who genuinely like Grimes) ITTs.

>>73836411
>NOT the trolls, her fanbase!
NOT even her fanbase - just YOU desu.

>>73836564
That about sums it up. Someone is continuously insistent on being a total cunt but will never admit it. Just likes to be right and foist their opinion on everyone like we should all just think the same thing.

WTF is wrong with some people?

>>73836564
Stop making baseless assumptions. You're more annoying than all her fans combined with your pathetic attempts to attack the trolls. You're very predictable.

>>73836588
Don't try to bully me, arrogant anon.

>>73836635
Not that anon, but you're bullying everyone. Why is it okay for you to do?

>>73836645
I don't bully anyone. I'm just saying my opinions. Why do you reply to me if you consider that bullying?

>>73836438
>Yeah but it's not the entire fanbase.
It's literally just this one guy >>73836411
atm. I know there are at least one or two others who occasionally drop by these threads late at night America time in order to whine about her not being their girlfriend. However I'm daily certain that has more to do with their weed smoking schedules than anything else...

>>73836676
Great observations. Not sure who it is, but there does seem like it's only really 1 or 2 anons from my observations. Very critical of opinions of her music in the negative, always defensive, always quick to anger and throw names at other anons.

>>73836693
You are slow in the brain

>>73836749
Not as slow as you.

>>73836065
>he act of maliciously interfering with the free flow of information in a pre-existing thread of discussion
Did you make that definition up? The "free flow of information" bit is optional for it to be trolling

>>73836676
>he doesn't include himself
Pathetic.

>>73836693
I think it might be 3 actually, since there's one with absolutely terrible grammar, one with a very distinct way of speaking that will nitpick any small grammar mistake, and one with middle-of-the-road grammar. There probably are around 5 total who post the "expecting to be taken seriously" and the "grimey sleeping well" memes, including those 3

>>73836834
I rarely see one talk about grammatical errors (how petty) but i'll keep an eye out.

Seems there are some "fans" of hers that are just hell bent on fucking up these threads worse than the trolls. That way NOBODY gets to enjoy these threads.

Congratulations, these people are worse than the trolls. In fact I think we need more trolls in here to mellow shit out a bit. Jeez.

>>73836870
yeah, the trolls are pretty funny honestly. I'm the (apparently) famous "I like her first two albums" guy that always get's shit like "you just dislike pop music" so I've experienced the worst of them front-on

>>73836870
>I rarely see one talk about grammatical errors (how petty) but i'll keep an eye out.
It's a certain anon who brags about being a professional musician or something like that. Something related to classical music. Indeed, that's petty.

>>73836925
Funny you mention that, i'm the other one who loves the first two! LOL. I have had a bit of back and forth with that one.

>>73836614
He's been obsessively "battling" anti-Grimes trolls since at least March or April of last year, and simply doesn't know when to quit (because IT IS NO LONGER NECESSARY - hint hint.) I'd actually have some sympathy for him (considering the sheer amount of underage retardation he's had to endure.) Except that I've been around here for nearly as long, and I generally don't behave like a sperg.

>>73836618
>Stop making baseless assumptions.
I'm not making baseless assumptions - I'm directly reacting to your increasingly unhinged, spergtastic behavior ITTs.

>>73836925
Do you seriously dislike pop music?

>>73836931
I've heard that guy (classical guy) a few times. Talked once. But that was about it.

>>73836951
Haven't been on these threads that long. But if it's been going on for that long, gives you an impression of the quality of these threads doesn't it?