...annnnnd thats a career, gals.
After a retard amount of shilling for their first album, these industry plants are now cooked.
Youll never hear about them again
I don't care.
Reply to this post if you feel the same way.
>73787564
If you didnt care you wouldnt have clicked this thread and responded it you faggot
Columbia is saving up for their Arcade Fire and Tyler, the Creator BNM's.
>>73787553
7.8 out of 10 is good though
above average
>>73787564
That I can do
That's a good rating.
>>73787583
Not really, you fucking retard. I care about this board so I care about the content on it. I'm not going to ignore it if someone's dog shits on my lawn but that doesn't mean I'm interested in dogshit now.
>>73787610
>I care about this board
Kill yourself. If you cared you'd make good threads and not let it turn to garbage
>>73787553
hmmm
>>73787619
>If you cared you'd make good threads and not let it turn to garbage
except I do. I have three threads up with 100+ replies so far. You can stop projecting anytime, anon.
I like a lot of it, but goddamn if I want a straight up live version of the album. A lot gets lost in the normie-appealing overproduction.
The title track is fucking spectacular.
>>73787553
they waited too fucking long
it's been what, 5 years since their debut?
that's an eternity for a buzzband
>>73787553
Is not bnm at leat
>>73787553
8.8 BNM if they were three strong black women tbqh
>>73787553
>7.8
the conceit of this thread is retarded. saged.
>>73787564
>>73788399
lol if 3 black women made the exact same album nothing changed but they are black this would've got 9.6 AOTY
>>73788399
>>73789913
there you go
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/21469-we-are-king/
>still playing the victim game
>>73787564
Replied and retweeted this because I can't totaly relate
>>73787564
>>73787564
reply
>>73790038
>http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/21469-we-are-king/
this actually reinforces my point. if KING were white this album would have got a 6.0 or more likely, never have been reviewed
>>73787553
Ugly bands general?
>>73787598
This is the p4k scale my newfriend, anything not "BNM" is pretty much panned
>>73788399
This is unironically true
>>73787564
I just hate joos
>>73791046
why do white people have such a victim complex?
>7.8
>bad
Literally only 2 albums have reached 7.5 in my ratings this year
>>73791726
>what are different rating scales
bye bye HAIM
Mega link?
>3 ugly jewesses
Why would I even listen to them in the first place
>>73792848
t. pol user
>>73792912
The emphasis is on ugly, but you can keep knee jerking, sperg
>>73792954
just a reminder that nigger :D
>>73790038
WE WUZ
>>73793050
no fuck u and ur meme
>major label artist
>industry shill
this meme has lost all meaning.
guys have you heard that uhh imagine dragons are industry shills? also marvel movies and the big bang theory
>>73792954
>The emphasis is on ugly
yeah you typed jewesses by accident. you hit the "jewesses" key in between O and P
>>73791046
>http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/21469-we-are-king/
Anon what's it like being such a timid pussy?
Why do you feel so inferior?
Were they even relevant before?
>>73793109
Who cares, all that matters is if their music is good.
>>73787564
>Reply to this post if you feel the same way.
Literally the 4chan equivalent of upvoting. Fucking kill yourself.
>>73793125
But they aren't good
>>73793050
KANGZ
>>73793152
I'm just tired of people saying bands are "irrelevant". Fuck relevant music. Relevant music usually sucks. I'd rather just talk about what is good and what is bad.
>>73793210
I agree. I've been seeing a lot of people dismissing Jay-Z's new album saying he "isn't relevant anymore". I mean, I actually didn't really like it either, but using relevance as an argument is ridiculous
>>73793080
i heard a rumor that artists on big labels are funded by their label
>>73791207
Unironically this, unless you get the fantano nod.
>>73787553
is this corey haims new band
Awful album, and I thought their first one was actually fairly enjoyable. I really don't get why this sounds so cluttered.