>he counts 2010 as apart of the 2010's and not the 2000's

what? the 2000s is 2000-2009

>>73786160
Would you count the year 2000 as part of the 90's then?

>>73786160
senpai...

If you have ever seriously contemplated this and sided on the "there is no year 0 so decades begin in the 1 year" you are autistic.

File: jimmy.jpg (446KB, 3200x1680px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 3200x1680px

>thinking the year 2000 should belong with the 1990's

1980 best year of the 70s

>>73786160
It's 0-9 not 1-0 you dunce

File: 1493791848078.jpg (10KB, 181x241px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 181x241px

>>73786160
>2010 isn't part of the 2010's

>>73786160
retarded frogposter

>>73786174
Yes

>>73786160

cultural shifts don't fall in line with numbers/dates...this ? isn't even related to /mu anyhow

>>73786199
There is no year 0. Every set of 10 years begins on a year that ends in 1.

>>73786281
Then why don't we call it the 1971s?

prolblably the best thread right now

>ITT: people still don't know that 1 BC is actually year zero

>>73786281
We live in a world governed by the concept of the number 10. Thus, year 0 is the exception, not the rule-maker.

>>73786281
then why wouldn't it just go from 1979 to 1981? or 1989 to 1991? this makes no sense

>>73786281
ok but colloquially 2010s are 2010-2019