>it's complex therefore it's good

>it's good therefore it's complex

>it's simple therefore it's bad

>it's noisy therefore it must be complex.

>>73784352

complex is good, probably my favorite song on the album

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDwui2n0rd8

>>73785962
it's good therefore it is bad.

Complexity and depth are good. What is often considered depth and complexity aren't really all that in-depth nor all that complex. Nor can there only be depth/complexity in just melodic development/harmonic progression, but in other ways as well.

>it's simple therefore it's real

>it's bad therefore it's good

File: 1462734720704.png (342KB, 513x524px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 513x524px

>>73784352
>Radiohead in a shellnut

>its trips

File: nicememe.jpg (7KB, 300x169px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 300x169px

>>73786323
>Radiohead
>Complex

>>73786323
Nah Radiohead is more like
>it focuses on production and sound so therefore the empty songwriting is okay because it sounds awesome anyway