>jazz thread guy >has terrible taste in jazz

really makes you think

i think his taste is fine. don't really agree with some of his top records (specifically the post-90s picks) but it's nothing absurdly bad

>>73780783
Japanese jazz piano meme man is bad, get over it anon

>>73781088
kill yourself you contrarian fag
I guarantee you were gargling his cock until sub-normies started to catch on

>>73781088
This, I have always found that "japanese piano jazz" stuff boring, even when it's being attempted in non-jazz contexts like Nujabes. Fukui is no different. It's shitty jazz for non-jazz "zomg cowboy bebop is so good, guys!" people.

File: 1468197757316.png (65KB, 253x238px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 253x238px

>>73781142

3/10, below average.

>>73781088
does he like/shill that album? i forgot if that was him or someone else here

>>73780783
A lot of the stuff he hypes sounds little better than average to me, but I will say that the guy at least has his own taste that and sticks to it

>>73781142
I do really like jazz (not just the type you're describing, mind you), and I still really enjoy Scenery. I don't understand the massive praise for it, but I also don't understand the new hate for it here. Is the new hate a reaction to the heavy praise or something?

>>73781216
JTG wrote a pretty negative review of it, and it seems to have pissed off one person here on /mu/

>gorespammer > jtg
objective truth

File: JTG spewing the truth.png (105KB, 1017x779px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1017x779px

>>73781210
>thinks it's a troll when it's all true
Lmao. Repetitive, limited as fuck takes on piano playing being considered masterworks is the real troll.
>>73781216
Pic.

File: 1499380398629.png (84KB, 272x305px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 272x305px

>muh harmonically interesting

Jtg is nothing more than an attention seeker

>>73781327
*thckthckthck*

does his dick taste good anon?

File: 1476816723933.png (206KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 800x800px

>>73780783
>monty
>has terrible taste in music
>has terrible taste in """women"""

you guys know Fukui has more than one album right? Scenery isn't even his best

File: Giant_steps.jpg (78KB, 717x1021px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 717x1021px

>>73781334
funny that you post a pic of Coltrane who wrote some of the most harmonically interesting jazz of his time

>>73781385
Really now? Tell me more about this here Coltrane fellow that no one's ever heard of.

>>73781301
oh good, i thought he was one of the people here who obsess over it for some reason

>>73781357
I am not a dick rider especially since I don't agree with him on best Miles or the best of this decade, but I bet that dick's probably better than everything Fukui made put together even if it's the grossest thing out there.

>>73781478
>>73781301
>>73781327
also 5/10 is not "pretty negative," jesus christ guys

>>73781382
Live at Nika is his best

>>73781485
what's best miles? and best of this decade for that matter?

File: quote-damn-the-rules-it-s-the-feeling-that-counts-john-coltrane-106-83-64.jpg (40KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 850x400px

>>73781385
It's funny that you're using Coltrane, a guy who says directly that you shouldn't care about theory, to back up your pedantry about theory.

dipshit

>>73781485
>"I am not a dick rider"
Famous words of a dick rider

>>73781622
For him it's ESP and I think that first Yosvanny Terry record that was out this decade.

>>73781709
>Damn the rules
jesus, what a dirty mouth he had

>>73781709
>one out-of-context quote from a musician is more meaningful than all of his recorded work
you seem like you probably know what you're talking about

>>73781742
No I mean according to you?

File: john-coltrane4.jpg (109KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 600x600px

>>73781772
it's not out of context because it means exactly what it sounds like. I literally put it IN context for you

>>73781709
>>73781831
Can you please provide for me where these quotes came from? Either where they were published, or recorded, or who heard him say them and when?

>>73781788
For Miles it's probably either Miles Smiles or In A Silent Way.

For this decade it's probably Atmosphères. Sampling and messing around with the live playing of others is pretty cool. Like a new take on being a conductor or something.

File: Pharoah-Sanders_1.jpg (59KB, 620x620px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 620x620px

>>73781861
I do not know, but the full quote is here and you can reverse search it if you think you can find out yourself:

“I never even thought about whether or not they understand what I'm doing... the emotional reaction is all that matters as long as there's some feeling of communication, it isn't necessary that it be understood.”

I think it's pretty clear what he means. Besides, most other great jazz musicians had a similar view of music.

File: JohnColtrane-30.jpg (106KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1024x768px

>>73782061
Yeah, nothing in that quote says that theory and technique aren't an important part of achieving communication and emotional reaction

Found another quote you might like.

>>73782130
I'm definitely saving this

>>73782130
kek

>>73782130
nice deflection of the point which is that 'harmonically interesting' doesn't mean anything if the music doesn't evoke emotional reaction

>>73782197
lol "interest" by definition is an emotion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interest_(emotion)

>>73782130
anon didn't say that it wasn't you dipshit the problem is JTG uses it as an ends in itself

I feel like the creative harmonic structures of Coltrane' + Sander's works are equally the result of artists who were well practiced and knew their instruments intimately, and visionary expressionists releasing their full force of emotion. Those who completely discredit the theoretical side of their work are willfully ignorant in a way, because the adventurous chord structures which mark their music are the frameworks for the powerful soloing overtop

>>73782228
>being this autistic

>>73782231
where?

>>73782250
How is it autistic? Obviously anything you find emotionally stimulating will be "interesting" what's the issue?

>>73782250

>doesn't have an argument
>"y-you're just au-autistic!!1!"

kys

>>73782296
You must be new. Whenever you get proven wrong and the other person has a good source to back it up, you call them autistic, simply because they expended time and effort to prove you wrong.

>Insulting one of the best content contributors to this shithole board

>>73782296
>>73782359
You're too autistic to realise that when I said "muh harmonically interesting" I wasn't referring to the word itself but how people use it on this board I.E., you're fucking autistic for posting a definition

>>73782598
Ok well what's wrong with how people use the phrase on this board?

>>73782598

>get BTFO
>try to pretend what you said means something differently than what it actually means

please stop you are fucking embarrassing yourself

I recognize this guy. Who ever is autistically bitching about feeling and fuck like practicing or theory or whatever. Fuck you in the ass guy.

lol at this thread