Why do we hate The Beatles /mu/ ?
THE
We don't
Everybody here loves them you fat faggot.
>>73766055
This
If you hate the Beatles unironically you are a sad excuse for a human being
>>73766025
>being this new
Great thread OP
DID YOU KNOW JOHN LENNON
WAS THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN
>>73766025
great photo
>>73766150
This.
The Beach Boys are better faggos
>>73766025
we don't and stop hating the beatles
>>73766025
they admitted to putting no thought into their breakout hits and then failed at being experimental. The Beach Boys were better in every way.
>>73766522
this
>>73767447
agree but too bad the beach boys only have one or two good albums
>>73767447
>failed at being experimental
>thought
I don't hate them.
But maybe if fucking "hipsters" would shut the fuck up about listening to them, ironically making themselves mainstream by listening to them en-mass, maybe I'd be less fucking annoyed by them.
>>73767584
>"hipsters" listening to them
You live in a very weird world
>>73766150
yup
This boards quality has gone downhill so much in the last 5 years. Especially recently.
>>73767584
I'll take it you don't know what a hipster is.
>>73766025
/mu/ doesn't because it's full of low test numales. The Beatles were shit, who didn't even have the cajones to tour for more than three years, wrote stupid, nonsensical songs about walruses, day trippers, and submarines, and then half of them went and died. They sucked eggs.
>>73766025
I like them but people who express their love and adoration for The Beatles nonstop are annoying. They were a good band but for christ's sakes they weren't the best ever or even close
>>73767754
This
>>73767754
Yes, they were.
>>73767717
>>73767629
I put hipster in quotes for a reason.
>>73768013
There's no possible way to interpret that post that doesn't end with it being wrong.
>>73767472
sounds like you haven't even listened to their records
>>73767518
got an argument you want to express?
>>73767447
>beach boys
>not nu-male trash
pick uno
>>73768479
>projection
Seriously man, the Beatles were plebs who hit the jackpot. Tell me, what kind of respectable artist would put out Dig a Pony?
>>73766025
stereo
>>73768525
>I can't wait til summer Cause it's gonna be a summer of love hey now well it's a love thing
>>73768579
>I want to hold your hand, I want to hold your hand
We can all cherrypick. At least Brian Wilson delved into interesting themes as they evolved. Lennon literally said they were nonsense lyrics. They didn't hide the truth so I don't know why you're in denial.
>>73768746
Why are you talking about cherrypicking while taking quotes out of context and trying to apply it to their entire discography to fit your shit argument of the Beatles not being the greatest band of the 60s if not all time
>>73768525
>the beatles were plebs
>abbey road
>magical mystery tour
>sgt. pepper
It's baffling to think people like you really exist. Do people like you just think that somehow disagreeing with almost every music historian and saying the beatles are pleb makes you somehow more enlightened? I'm genuinely curious, did you read scaruffi's review of the beatles and just whack your tiny dick off to the idea that somehow you knew more 99% of the population and realized that the beatles weren' good or some shit? You people are like that one kid in school we tried to talk about music but their autism would show and everyone just hated them by the end of the conversation.
>>73767862
wtf is he crazy?
>>73769434
I wouldn't say crazy, but maybe mad. Yes, a mad man.
The beatles are unironically one of the best bands, if not the best band of all time. No matter how much you try to refute this, people who know much more about music than you and studied it their whole life reached this verdict probably before you were born. I understand music is subjective and in a way it's kind of ridiculous to call a band "the greatest of all time" but the beatles influence is undeniable and I feel like the title isn't inappropriate to bestow upon them. It also doesn't help that most people who deny the beatles talent would place some shit "totally obscure" indie album as one of the greatest of all time when it's clearly just a niche record they themselves appreciate, but most likely has no universal appeal. Not to mention all the artists they love were probably inspired by the beatles in some shape or form. At the end of the day, you can think whatever you want about them but if you try to argue that they're "objectively" bad somehow, you're probably blinded by your contrarian beliefs.
>>73766150
agreed
>>73766025
We don't, they're probably the best band of all time.
>>73767447
Source?
they're just kind of emotionally and intellectually immature compared to the beach boys
>>73769779
>"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see"
>"Everybody was surfin', surfin' USA"
>>73766150
this
/thread
scaruffi told me so
>>73769810
>surfin' USA is representative of the beach boys
Sgt. Pepper's and Abbey Road are on /mu/core, and contrarians like Revolver, how can we hate them?
>>73769971
>"And in the end, the love you take, Is equal to the love you make"
>"Surf's Up, mm-mm, mm-mm, mm-mm"
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>73766150
it's bait usually, shit bait
Does anyone actually know what awards scaruffi was given when referring to "
This old article by Piero Scaruffi has won several international awards as the most professional analysis of the career of pop group the Beatles ever written"
>>73766025
I agree that the Beatles are overrated. So, instead of being the best band ever, they are only 4th or 5th.
>>73766481
>>73766506
underrated