Was she the Grimes of the 90s?

> implying there was a better asian pop star before the late 2000's

who?

>>73702724
No, Bjork is actually talented and creative.

>>73702753
>asian

>>73702753
>70s
?
>80s
Kate Bush
>90s
Bjork
>00s
?
>10s
Grimes

No because Björk's music is tolerable

File: 17457685_10155193725397996_5325728460733453680_n_zpsrvheuxf8.jpg (47KB, 600x520px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 600x520px

I prefer noodle

File: 486eff24821034a0006880d29cf1421a--men-with-long-hair-asian-guys-with-long-hair.jpg (16KB, 236x419px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 236x419px

>>73702783
> 00s asian musician
> Steve Aoki

>>73702834
>asian
none of the ones I listed are Asian, what the fuck are you on about?

No, she was the Björk of the 90's

>>73702839
->>73702753

>>73702724
Yes but Grimes could only wish to be as good as bjerk

>>73702846
>it's a tripfag derailing a thread
oh, okay

>>73702776
Grimes is talented and creative too.

>>73702724
Yes.

>>73702783
>70s
Joni Mitchell
>00s
Karin Dreijer

>>73702871
She's better.

Leave her alone. :^(

File: 1413029894666.gif (3MB, 493x520px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 493x520px

>>73703079
>Grimes is talented and creative too.

>>73702997
>tripfag
summer is here

>>73703200
Of course.

https://rbt.asia/mu/thread/73640047/#q73648277

>>73703200
she really is tho

GRIMES PROFILE

>Full name: Claire Elise Boucher
>Born: 17 March 1988 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
>Origin: Québécois, Ukrainian, Russian and Italian descent
>Instruments: vocals, synthesizer, sampler, keyboard, guitar, bass, drums, violin, ukulele

>Skills:
- singer
- songwriter
- producer
- sound engineer
- lyricist
- live performer
- visual artist
- music video director
- dancer
- model
- virtuoso
- writer

>Main interests:
Music, visual arts, dancing, books, films, modeling, video games, internet, and others

>Music taste:
http://www.last.fm/user/chairmandore/library
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahnUH7wnW30
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimes_%28musician%29#Musical_style
http://www.pandora.com/station/2895208146671614201

>Others:
- Grimes does everything in her music, from singing and songwriting to artwork and production
- nice personality, beautiful look, cares about environment issues and saving animals
- took her name from grime music after discovering the existence of the genre on Myspace
- studied ballet for 11 years
- was a goth outcast in high school
- studed neuroscience, philosophy, and Russian literature and McGill University before being dropped out for missing classes
- had some troubles in the past: drugs, 2 friends died because of overdosing drugs, sexual assault, shitty jobs, the professor who got her into a music program killed himself
- started making music when she was around the age of 22 or 23
- big Lord of the Rings, Dune, Game of Thrones, Star Wars, Abbess Hildegard von Bingen and Russian literature fan
- her best friends are James Brooks, Hana, Bloodpop, Duffy, Born Gold

>>73703260
>this pasta again
is there any reason that you still include the "main interests", "music taste", and "others" sections? those are rarely relevant to any discussion related to Grimes. Plus her music taste is shit.

>>73703260
Nevermind

File: laughing canadian crust punk.jpg (109KB, 679x1024px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 679x1024px

>>73703256
>>73703260
Avril Lavigne has more songwriting talent than Grimes.

>>73703280
Why do you people do these things? It's not fun for anyone else

>>73703283
Legit bait. And I like Avril.

>>73703283
and she's 10000x hotter.

File: Enslavedstudiogrutle1.jpg (103KB, 1282x855px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1282x855px

>>73703260

She's a meme, nobody here would pull a list of facts like that out for somebody like Grutle of Enslaved or Aleksey of Temnozor/M8L8TH

>>73703308
can you be more specific?

>>73703326
No bait, bating is what you do to gremlins.

File: 5546734848_ed13a4c30f_z.jpg (69KB, 640x425px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 640x425px

>>73703260
>- virtuoso

>>73703260
I want you to know if I ever meet Grimes I'm going to kill her because of you.

>>73703283

This pic was taken before she turned green because of Limes disease

>>73703383
Hit her with a hammer.

>>73703388
She's over it now and writing new material, Claire. Kinda like you and getting over your drug addictions...oh wait...

>>73703280
>>73703282
>>73703283
>>73703351
>>73703372
>>73703383
>>73703415
Stop hating Grimes you posers, just because she has a better fanbase than your favorite artist doesn't mean she's "overrated".

FBI, get him >>73703383

>>73703369
You wish

>>73703425
Stop being mean to Claire. She had issues irl.

>>73703434
Whatever, Claire.

BEST MOMMY MUSICIANS OF 2017
>Annie Clark
>Angel Olsen
>Björk
>Regina Spektor
Feel free to add.

>>73703434
>better fanbase
her fanbase consists of normies and around 12 people on an Indonesian toenail clipping board, so I'm gonna assume no

>>73703434
I liked her, and then you decided to be incredibly annoying about her instead. Why do you have to be so fucking insane

>>73703434
I never hated Grimes. You people have made me hate her.

>>73703478
I don't want to see your dick thanks, if i want to see a worm i'll dig up some mud.

>>73702724
Björk has created more interesting and unique music than Grimes will ever achieve imo

>>73703489
She's not talk to you though

>>73703517
this, even her most normie song (It's Oh So Quiet) is more interesting than any Grimes songs

File: 256px-Liberty_Bell_2008.jpg (30KB, 256x303px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 256x303px

>>73703531
BIG BELL

File: bork.jpg (185KB, 3200x2400px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 3200x2400px

>>73703552
YOU BLOW A FUSE

>>73703260
>>Skills:
>- singer
>- songwriter
>- producer
>- sound engineer
>- lyricist
>- live performer
>- visual artist
>- music video director
>- dancer
>- model
>- virtuoso
>- writer

yeah, but she doesn't particularly excel at one any of these.

>>73703434
I didn't say shit about her music, I said shit about the fact that you people turned her into a meme. I stayed away from Neutral Milk Hotel for years because the fanbase annoyed me, AOS was a great album, but I shouldn't have had to cringe when I saw the way people talked about it here.

>>73703527
Thank fuck I don't have to listen to her then, eh?

>>73703514
That's pathetic. You shouldn't hate her. Don't be a major dumbass.
>>73703517
>>73703531
(You)
>>73703655
She does. The result is her art.

>>73703738
>every opinion I disagree with is bait
grimesfags, everyone

>>73703738
lol, you can't argue against two of the four posts you quoted.

>>73703691
You dont get to either

>>73703771
I don't WANT to, Claire.

Bjork and Kate Bush have multiple platinum and gold certifications truly showing how widespread their influence was/is. Grimes simply doesn't have the star power to compete with them, if she was unable to do it her last few albums I highly doubt she'll start now.

>>73703841
grimes posters are completely out of touch with reality. reminds me of marina and the diamonds' 3 fans who desperately always try to bring her up when high profile pop stars are being discussed

>>73702783
>>73703079
>>73703256
>>73703260
>>73703388
>>73703434
>>73703478
>>73703738
>>73703771
>Grimesfag
>expecting to be taken seriously
pick one

>>73704005
Ok guy

Can we have a bjork thread without always talking about Grimes?

>>73704095
>implying this isn't a very poorly concealed Grimes thread
I agree with you in actual Bjork threads but come on my man

>>73703260
>singer
>songwriter
grimes has no skill in either of these areas

>>73702724
No, people actually fucking listened to Bjork throughout the 90's, Top 40 radio to MTV to gay clubs pumpin Post.
And by its close she was about to win an Cannes award for acting and nominated for an Oscar with the swan dress right before he best albums.

I've never listened to Grimes ever and neither has most anyone.

>>73704114
Regardless, it always happens no matter what kind of thread relating to bjork.

>>73704095
I cant do anything without it being about grimes

File: 1490987515058.jpg (58KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 600x800px

>>73704095

That thing with redhead cold play was pretty good, yeah. . . .

>>73704157
That's why I said that I agree with you there. They're insufferable

Nah, Björk is good

>>73703260
>>73703738
>implying that Grimes life makes her a decent artist lol
>implying that your opinion makes her a better artist

>>73703434
>implying Grimes fanbase aren't a bunch of lonely fat otakus

>>73703506
>>73703510
>>73703514
>>73703663
>>73703990
Exactly, Grimes fanbase is cancerous and it's what kills that artist

>>73703517
>>73703531
>>73704095
Björk>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Grimes

File: tumblr_osc8yzVFnu1r7hus4o1_540.jpg (161KB, 540x810px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 540x810px

>>73703841
>Bjork and Kate Bush have multiple platinum and gold certifications truly showing how widespread their influence was/is.
That shows that their big labels did their jobs. 50 Cent and Bieber sold way more albums than Bjork and KB; does that mean they're better? Popularity =/= quality.

>Grimes simply doesn't have the star power to compete with them,
She has way more star power than both combined. She doesn't have the proper marketing budget to "buy" popularity.

>if she was unable to do it her last few albums I highly doubt she'll start now.
When Bjork released her second official solo album Post, Grimes already did 4 solo albums + 1 EP. She's on the right track.

>>73704591
* When Bjork released her second official solo album Post, Grimes already did 4 solo albums + 1 EP.
I meant by the time Bjork had the same age as Grimes

>>73704591
>Bjork
>big label

>>73704591
>When Bjork released her second official solo album Post, Grimes already did 4 solo albums + 1 EP. She's on the right track.
Why are you ignoring Bjork's work in The Sugarcubes?

>>73704590
>it's what kills that artist
Are you serious? Her popularity grows with every post here. There's no bad publicity. In the grand scheme of things your shitty pathetic posts mean nothing.

File: ncxPNvo.jpg (58KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x667px

>>73704590

I don't even see why people get into her like that, probably the same reason they obsess over crystal castles, because it's vaporhousetripblacktraplofilowercaseasmrharshslamdjentchilllwave with a girl on the cover they feel they would actually have a chance with

>>73704629
Polydor
Universal
Elektra
Atlantic

Big bucks for Bjork's marketing team

>>73704676
>Her popularity grows with every post here
Do you realize how many people dislike Grimes because of her fanbase?

For every one fan you fain, you alienate three due to your crazy obsessiveness

File: 004 - rqnAd4J.png (306KB, 593x540px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 593x540px

>>73703260
>posting that

you don't even deserve a nice smug girl

>>73704696
you have no idea how licensing deals work, son

>>73704643
Yes. That's why I said her solo albums. The Sugarcubes was a mere novelty band. Bjork is mostly remembered for her solo work. That's relevant.

File: BNh0REkCEAAqbJd.jpg (37KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 600x450px

>>73704591
kate bush went platinum on a independent studio. retard

bjork started out on one little indian, an indie label (she's still currently signed to them) and that initial success allowed her music to be distributed to other countries via larger labels. retard

grimes has zero star power. s o r r y

>>73704728
>The Sugarcubes was a mere novelty band
Grimes sounds pretty novelty as well
>Bjork is mostly remembered for her solo work
Only by people who don't know anything about music.

Show me what band Grimes was in that got some top hits anon. Are you able to?

File: image.png (30KB, 980x446px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 980x446px

>>73704701
>Do you realize how many people dislike Grimes because of her fanbase?
Just a bunch of irrelevant /mu/ users unable to filter and ignore her posts. Other than that?

>The internet is absolutely positive about 'grimes'.

>>73704728
>a mere novelty band
>implying Birthday isn't a million times better than any Grimes song

>>73704781
[citation needed]

>>73704781
>the /mu/ users are irrelevant yet somehow every post about her here grows her popularity
way to contradict your own post

File: img.png (126KB, 320x667px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 320x667px

>>73704755
>kate bush went platinum on a independent studio
But independent label? Do you see this bigass list? Kate had a huge support unlike Grimes who started making music in Garageband in a shitty loft in Montreal.

>>73704788
>implying Birthday isn't a million times better than any Grimes song
Yes, implying that. Birthday is a cute novelty song and that's all.

>>73704861
>a cute novelty song
>song you don't like = novelty song
kek

>>73704825
Her popularity here is irrelevant too. Those NEETs don't even pay for her music: they download all her music for free. She doesn't earn anything by being popular here.

>>73704919
>her popularity here is irrelevant too
then how does posting about her increase her popularity?

>>73704876
Did I say I dislike it? "Cute" doesn't imply dislike.

>>73704943
what makes it a novelty song, then?

>>73704919
>She doesn't earn anything by being popular here.
Then why would her label fund the ongoing bots to create discussion?

>>73704676
>Her popularity grows with every post here
>>73704919
>Her popularity here is irrelevant too
nice

>>73704934
Exposure. I just mentioned the purpose of her popularity here. She becomes popular on this board but this board is irrelevant. Shallow popularity.

>>73704985
but she doesn't become popular on this board, basically what >>73704701 says.

>>73703260
you realise if you have a lot of skills that you're shit at you aren't talented, right?

>>73704974
>Then why would her label fund the ongoing bots to create discussion?
Edgy claims. You better prove that.
>>73704982
Yes. Her popularity grows with each post but overall it's an irrelevant popularity. This audience doesn't consist of paying consumers but sneaky freeloaders.

File: Screenshot 2017-07-02 13.52.47.png (14KB, 646x379px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 646x379px

>>73704781
>>The internet is absolutely positive about 'grimes'.
What is interesting about this, is
1) the information was cultivated in 2012, with nothing since then. This was years before Art Angels was even released. This is not current data, over 5 years old by now
2) Just several months before the information was gathered, as you can see she only had a 50% approval rating. Classic example of cherrypicking data for a confirmation bias

>>73704998
>a lot of skills that you're shit at
Here's the problem: could you prove that?

>>73705023
>her popularity grows with each post
her popularity yes, but less people like her with every post from you retards

>>73705023
>Edgy claims.
How is that edgy?

Think about Grimes generals:
>same information is repeated in every thread
>specific appraisals used to start conversation
>any dissent is met with neutral, robotic responses
It really seems like Grimesfags have a predictable and even created speaking pattern, don't they?

>>73705030
Just nitpicking. Even if those stats would be updated I can assure you she's way more liked than disliked.

>>73705054
>but less people like her with every post
Those people aren't in her target anyway. Those people don't even care about her and many of them simply ignore or filter her threads. Nothing is lost, nothing is gained.

File: Screenshot_20170702_220228.png (32KB, 1291x601px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 1291x601px

>popularity less than it was 3 fucking years ago

s-she's gonna get big guys, a-any day now

>>73705093
Edgy claims. You better prove that.

File: tinfoil.jpg (40KB, 350x347px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 350x347px

>>73705075
Now do you assume that her fans are bots? Whatever floats your boat.

>>73705093
>posts outdated data
>calling that data outdated is just nitpicking
legitimately off yourself

>>73705133
>those people aren't her target anyway
yeah, but that's why there's no reason to claim that her popularity grows, like you originally did

>>73703841
I'm sorry, but did Grimes already lose? Oh, that's right. The decade isn't even over yet. In fact, it's just getting started. Does not being the most listened artist in spotify counts as a loss? Is that what you're saying? Because if you're saying that I can assure you that you're wrong. Why would you make this post when the decade is still going on? Grimes is still in the industry right now and she has been the best female artist for how many years now? She's going against some of the worst artists in the industry who just happen to have hype because they're feeding off the bad taste of the masses. But you know what? They still fucking suck. Grimes is one of the best fucking artists, she has over 10 confirmed skills in different areas related to music. Maybe you should shut the fuck up before you make retarded posts like this. You know why? Because you're going to be embarrassed when Grimes wins and someone bumps this topic. Oh look at that, Grimes just said she could release a new album soon, just like people were worried about. Are you a fucking drunk? Are you retarded? Are you autistic? You are a fucking idiot and you should never make a comment on this board again and I'm fucking serious. I almost have a feeling you're the only guy making all these anti-Grimes posts because you're a faggot hater who doesn't like Grimes because she's good. Fuck you, be good at something in YOUR life and then maybe try to troll fucking genius artists on the board, like I give a fuck. It's so easy to spot out your posts now, you're a retard. Always doing stupid shit like this. Why don't you try to be a good poster? Just for once? For once in your fucking life try not to make a comment like this. That's just you, you're always right at getting it wrong. Fuck you. You are nothing.

>>73705158
>Now do you assume that her fans are bots?
Never seen them in the wild, so to speak.

I believe what i see.

File: 1499022249224.png (47KB, 1291x601px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 1291x601px

>>73705142
That's perfectly normal once you know what happened. There are fewer searches now because she didn't tour at all for over half a year. Watch this chart again once she releases a new album + resumes touring.

>>73705197
holy fucking shit dude. new pasta?

>>73705197
you gave it away as bait with "10 confirmed skills"

>>73705243
If she really mattered, people would be interested in her all the time instead of only some of the time.

>>73705243
so she released what you subhumans call her best work and gained zero (0) popularity in return

really made me think

>>73705169
>yeah, but that's why there's no reason to claim that her popularity grows, like you originally did
There's a reason: on /mu/ there's always "fresh meat". Many newcomers listen to her amazing music to see what's the deal with her popularity here. You have no idea how many fans she earned after she released Art Angels.

Those who already made up their mind (like you) are mostly a lost cause. Those will never give her a fair chance anyway.

>>73705258
>>73705274

It's old as fuck from /sp/.

Btw the chiefs fucking suck.

>>73705294
so the only thing to back your claim up about her growing in popularity is some vague "spergs listen to her on 4channel" bullshit ? Meanwhile actual stats show her popularity stagnating

>>73705288
Come on, already. Do you really expect that? Check those kind of charts for ANY artist you want. You're going to see something similar. Activity: more interest; less activity: less interest.

>>73705294
I like Halfaxa though, I just dislike Art Angels and Visions (really dislike). Art Angels was almost 2 years ago, and you grimesfags have ruined any positive attention she used to have

>>73705289
You're stupid. That spike of activity happens every time an artist (ANY ARTIST) releases something, then it slowly fades away. Becasue people have better stuff to do than to search nonstop for news when the artist is between albums.

When she will release her next album, the spike will be bigger than when she released Art Angels. The cycle will repeat.

I'm actually convinced 95% of the post in this thread are being posted by some IRC chat trying to troll us. It's fucking impossible that there are so many grimesfags actively posting in this board. It's insane.
You waltz in, completely disregard the established board culture, do whatever the fuck you want, call whomever you disagree with "plebs," and you say you are not being selfish? Just kill yourself. The human race can do without people like you.

Do you really expect your delusional and incoherent ramblings to be read? Everyone plonked you long ago. Do you fantasize that your tantrums and conniption fits could possibly be worth the $0.000000001 worth of electricity used to send them?

And the worst thing is that they project superior mentality every time you complain about them. You can't crack them. They're smarmy, sarcastic by telling half-lies, half-clues and insulting you in the most idiotic, vague ways possible.

>>73705477
Not talking about the spike, mongoloid. Her average intrest is less than it was 3 years ago. She gained NOTHING.

>>73705483
>copypasta
you really underestimate how much /mu/ likes grimes, grimes threads have been around for years

GRIMES WILL NOT DIVIDE US

>>73705529
>Her average intrest is less than it was 3 years ago. She gained NOTHING.
3 years ago she toured, dumbass. Now she doesn't tour at all. If she kept touring the average would be above that 25 line. After she will release her next album, the average will grow up really fast. Those who searched about her are still there, they don't disappear. Just in "hibernation".

That chart is FLEXIBLE.

>>73705463
>you grimesfags have ruined any positive attention she used to have
No. Let's ignore your retarded term "grimesfags" for a moment. We made her way more respected. WAY MORE. Did you see her older threads from 2012? Almost all users made fun of her, shitpost about her and basically didn't give a fuck about her music. Case in point https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/mu/thread/25409916/ Compared to that bullshit, her new threads are much better.

Even if you insult her and her fans, you know (secretly) they're badasses.

>>73705585
>way more respected
she gets just as much hate in her own threads as she used to, and now she gets even more hate outside of her threads.

>secretly you know they're badasses
o i am laffin

>>73705746
>>73705585
why did you even bother remaking your post if you left in an error and only switched around the placement of "secretly"

this is cancer.

>>73705413
>Meanwhile actual stats show her popularity stagnating
That's NOT her popularity. Just how many people searched for Grimes news/articles/etc. Even if less people are searching about her that doesn't mean those people don't know or don't listen to her music.

As a matter of fact watch out when she will drop her next masterpiece. You will see a huge spike out of nowhere.

>>73705788
My grandfather smoked his whole life.

I was about 10 years old when my mother said to him, "If you ever want to see your grandchildren graduate, you have to stop immediately."

Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake. He gave it up immediately.

Three years later he died of lung cancer. It was really sad and destroyed me.

My mother said to me, "Don't ever smoke. Please don't put your family through what your grandfather put us through." I agreed.

At 28, I have never touched a cigarette.

I must say, I feel a very slight sense of regret for never having done it, because your post gave me cancer anyway.

>>73705818
>that's not her popularity
then what does measure it?

>>73705775
This is how I roll.
>>73705788
(You)
>>73705754
>she gets just as much hate in her own threads as she used to
Way less. Count the positive posts vs negative posts from each thread. Be surprised.
>and now she gets even more hate outside of her threads.
Stay chill; she always got hate from this board. /mu/ can't handle her.
>o i am laffin
Laughing and not being normal. Now seriously, you don't fool anyone.

>>73705483

If you look at Grimes threads on average there's around only around 20 posters, and most are haters, it's the same few people arguing with each other in these threads, you can just tell by their posts, the same arguments all the time. People act like Grimes is popular here but it's really only a handful of people.

You'd think they'd be sick of writing the same thing over and over again, this goes for haters and her fans. Just a waste of time in the end because nothing changes.

>>73705899
>way less
less, but not way less. plus, I would say that the less grimes haters is more responsible to people not even bothering then you retards actually making enough of an effort to get them to leave. If you think that you managed to change something, then you're wrong, considering that the quality of the positive posts between the threads are about the same.

File: bowie.png (257KB, 1407x656px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1407x656px

>>73705889
Just the search interest and nothing more. Check this: https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=David_Bowie

That's David Bowie's Wikipedia page. When he died (a super notable event) his Wikipedia views skyrocketed. But now? They're much smaller. Does that mean Bowie's popularity faded away? Or that there's less search interest because there are no notable Bowie events right now?

Similar thing for Grimes' search interest.

>>73705870
cool man, why would i care
>>73705899
>i like grimes shes the best
>i think youre stupid for liking grimes
youre all assholes
>>73705959
hence why ITT cancer

>>73705959
I don't know, i'm not a hater but I really do enjoy arguing with the obsessives. It gets fun after a while.

>>73705975
>less, but not way less.
Whatever. Some of these haters are doing it for fun anyway. They don't really care about her, they just want drama.

>If you think that you managed to change something, then you're wrong, considering that the quality of the positive posts between the threads are about the same.
About the same? Are you kidding me? The positive posts now (2017) far surpass the positive posts then (2012). Overall, the balance is in her favor.

>>73706049
>2012 positive posts
"she's like the female Angelo Badalamenti"
>2017 female posts
"she's the artist of the decade"

the exaggeration and obvious obsessiveness has only grown over the past 5 years

>>73706072
>the exaggeration and obvious obsessiveness has only grown over the past 5 years
Nothing unexpected. Why does that bother you?

>>73703260
>being dropped out for missing classes
Wow, that's really quite the achievement

>>73702724
of the 90s or of the 70s and 80s?

>>73706114
it only bothers me when people make bullshit claims about how they "got /mu/ to respect them" when they clearly didn't

>>73705959
>around only around 20 posters
Enough to keep a general thread for years? HA HA HA HA HA HA!

You're in the denial stage.

>>73705959
Why do you shitpost on /mu/?

>>73706133
They could say whatever they want. To be triggered is not your job.

>>73706149
give one good reason why it would be impossible for 20 or so people to maintain a general for years, even if the anon you're replying to wasn't only referring to the current state.

>>73706197
>they could say whatever they want
just like i have the right to correct them if they're wrong
>correcting someone is being triggered now
the state of /grimes/

>>73706223
let them have their fantasy world about how they won the respect of a board that has no respect for anything, why ruin the fun for everyone else

>>73705197
>In fact, it's just getting started
>2017
Grimes fags confirmed underaged

>>73706297
They are an enclave on this board. They have nothing in common with this sexist, vile, misogynist, elitist, dumb board. That's why /mu/ hate them.

>>73706397
>enclave
youre an idiot

and as the board goes this used to be one of the better ones until those fuckers from >>>/pol/ got tired of their echo chamber

>>73706397
>it's sexist because they dislike my shit waifu that happens to be a female
okie dokie. there's nothing wrong with elitism, by the way

>>73706442
They are an enclave. Same thing as Kpop. They have nothing in common with mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

>>73706397
Jesus Christ. I've always thought Grime's revenge posse on this board was deluded but damn son. You just put that right over the top.

>>73706477
>there's nothing wrong with elitism
WTH?

>>73706509
Then stay in your fucking containment threads then.

>>73702724
She is the female Bowie

>>73706526
name an issue. if you actually do delve into music enough that you know hundreds more than anyone else on the board, then you really are an "elite" on the board. I miss elitist /mu/

>>73706526
Elitism? You came to the music board. The music board. What the fuck do you expect, "HEY GUYS I REALLY THINK THE NEW BEYONCE SON-"

fuck you.

>>73706530
Then don't fucking come here and shitpost your stupid ideas.

>>73706623
I expect a little decency, cretin. Music taste is subjective. There's nothing wrong to like Beyonce (I don't like her but I don't insult those who like her). If you dislike something it doesn't mean it's objectively bad.

>>73703079
Literally who?

>>73707091
>I expect a little decency
Then learn more about music before you discuss it, instead of just parroting top 40 bullshit and entry level music like you're an expert. That's what elitism is against. The anon that you were replying to was not only focusing on the point that he thinks that beyonce is bad, he was focusing on the point that she's entry-level and ruins discussion

>>73707091
>nothing wrong with liking beyonce
i agree but that wasnt my point
>objectively bad
again no one is saying this, but you cant bring your 3rd grade fingerpainting to an art gallery and expect to be respected now can you
>>73707154
this. thanks for actually giving them a kind response, youre better than i am

>>73707178
>you're better than I am
Thanks, man. Favorite band? Might as well get some worthwhile discussion here

>>73707178
>but you cant bring your 3rd grade fingerpainting to an art gallery
Beyonce is anything but 3rd grade fingerpainting. Why do you hate black women?

>>73706149

I said average, look at the post counts, I'm not talking about just generals, this one and the general up are rarities because there's 40+

It is just the same few fans arguing though, unless there are others just copying and pasting the same things.

>>73706171

I don't. I actually want to discuss music which is hard these days. Especially for someone who's both a big Grimes and a Bjork fan like me. Most threads usually turn into this one, sometimes there's threads where you get good discussion. It's probably only going to get worse when they announce their new albums. Or maybe it'll get better and we can actually discuss the music.

>>73707198
>favorite band
I would have to say the Grateful Dead but thats not to say I think theyre the best band I listen to, my tastes skew towards jazz/folk music but really the only thing I can never get into is metal
>>73707386
0/10

>>73707472
Band might have been a bad term? Favorite artist/album? Love GD by the way, Live/Dead is top 50 material

>>73703260
>hasn't scrobbled in a decade
damn...

>>73702724
No, she actually deserved her praise

File: 220px-Here_Comes_the_Whistleman.jpg (17KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 220x220px

>>73707602
favorite artist i guess would be roland kirk, favorite album would be helplessness blues but mainly because of all the memories attached to that period of my life

pic is something i just found at a yard sale, i like it but its nothing really special, just kinda bring jazz

>>73707472
>0/10
Not an argument. Do you even try, dumbass?

>>73707869
what argument is necessary against obvious bait?

>>73707869
-10/10 youre terrible at this

>>73707869
what score is befitting of a bait post saying that you must hate black women if you dislike Beyoncé?

the grimesfags on this board have made me actively hate grimes. i had no opinion of her until i saw this shit. what is wrong with these people?

>>73702776
>>73702783
>katebush
>>73703079
>Joni Mitchell
yeah, but not grimes

>>73708966
Kate Bush was irrelevant in the 90s. Bjork was Queen Superior.

>>73708966
>yeah, but not grimes
Because you want it?

Bjork is good
Grimes is not good
so, no

Bjork is not good
Grimes is good
so, no

>>73708753
no, what is wrong with you? you are hating an artist because of some shit posted on a chinese cartoon board

>>73702724
Grimes is dollar store bjork from the now, Bjork is still an good and active artist, she's had her ups and downs but still. You should have started this thread with an inverted title because gosh darn Bjork is a better songwriter than grimes

>>73710049
Grimes is the improved Bjork. This is not negotiable.

>>73710075
Grimes a generic washed out pop artist with a very low skill level for the amount that she has broke into indie and mainstream popularity. It's an anomaly. Bjork is just fucking fantastic singer with good production and actually deserves recognition beyond her fanbase for her legitimate talent.