Is this the musical equivalent to Ulysses?

No, it's the musical equivalent to New York Times garbage.

>>73687336
because of rambling monologues?

No, try actually reading Ulysses

>>73687336
Given that Ulysses is considered one of the greatest English language novels ever written but you posted some bandcamp tier album I've never seen or heard of before, I think it's a safe bet to say 'no' without even listening to it.
In terms of its place in the canon of western music, Ulysses would likely have it's musical equivalent in the works of Beethoven, Bach, Mozart and so on. However, given that Ulysses is a highly experimental modern novel written in the early 20th century, in terms of its style and influence, its musical equivalent would likely be in the works of Schoenberg, Berg, Webern, Stravinsky, Debussy, Bartok and so on.

>>73687576
I'm from /lit/ and just dropping by to tell you to kys you fucking pseud

>>73687576
holy moly you're a retard.

>>73687597
>I'm from /lit/
Yeah? Impressive qualification.
I've just got two nobel prizes in literature and actually ghost-wrote all of Joyce's novels and Shakespeare's plays.

why do /lit/fags always need validation from /mu/ and even /tv/? is it because they know these are the superior mediums?

>>73687336
The musical equivalent of Ulysses is "Sinfonia" by Luciano Berio

>>73687649
>ghost-writing anglo trash
Yeah? Impressive qualification.

File: latest[1].jpg (111KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 500x500px

Actually, the musical equivalent of Uylesses is Walmart Associate Choir - Eyes of a Child