Thoughts on this?
>>73670120
Imagine being this wrong
>>73670120
switch "pleb" and "patrician"
Move everything to the left one, and the further most left one to the far right
>>73670228
>>73670237
OK.
>>73670309
cheeky bastard
>>73670309
kek
100% medically accurate
grimesfags need to be eliminated
Grimes is objectively bad
>inb4 music is subjective
Grimes doesn't make music, she makes garbage
>>73670554
>>73670578
Be nice.
>>73670593
Grimes is not for sexual.
>>73670120
Pretty accurate
>>73670593
>ywn Ranch in her Hidden Valley
>>73670746
she looks like one of the kids who were in the zoology club
>>73670120
joanna is fucking sexy
>>73670578
You're trying too hard, pleb. Just say it: you are unable to appreciate highly sophisticated music.
Why Grimes is so much better than any female artist?
>>73670309
>>73670971
>Why Grimes is so much better than any artist?
grimes a shit
>>73670120
I would like to know if there are any actual producers and musicians that are fans of her. She is certainly a meh producer, and her music seems made for people that doesn't know anything about music, and it shows with her fanbase. They can't actually talk about anything music related.
>>73670120
Joanna is the patrician's choice because she got a fat ass.
>>73671637
There are plenty of musicians and producers that are Bjork fans.
>>73671844
I would assume >>73671637 meant Grimes
>>73670120
literally end yourslef
>>73670860
can you guys imagine that she could possibly date you? her standards aren't that high, marrying andy samberg and shit
>>73670120
i have no objection
grimes is the best female artist ever imo
>>73670120
t. underage retard
:)
>>73671935
Why he avoided mentioning her name? There are 3 artists on that chart, not one.
>>73672335
>not talking about her music
Are you an idiot?
>>73670120
Whos the right one?
>>73672558
The artist of the decade aka Claire Boucher
>>73672479
Why would he have to do that? This is a thread for discussing those three artists, full stop.
>>73670120
Joanna isn't contrarian by any means but I guess it's better than calling her pleb
>>73670860
99% sure I have this picture saved already but I'm still saving it again anyways, just to be safe
>>73670120
how are they similar?
>>73670120
top 5 worst opinions on 4chan today
>>73672597
>Claire Boucher
thnx
>>73670120
All of these are wrong.
>Bork
experienced
era defining
kinda a cute
>Newsom
genuinely talented
original
Ys is great
>Dirts
greasy
only plebeians find her music appealing
uggo objectively
>>73672971
>uggo objectively
LMFAO
Maybe if grimes wasn't a sell out
>>73672971
>uggo objectively
>>73672971
>only plebeians find her music appealing
Huh? Bjork sold MILLIONS of albums (between 20 and 40); the plebs love her. Meanwhile Grimes sold barely 200k-300k albums like a true patrician. Both got critical acclaim, but Bjork is for plebs.
You got it wrong, deluded pleb.
>greasy
>uggo objectively
Just your shitty opinion. To add insult to injury: unrelated to music too.
>>73672971
>uggo objectively
..surely you are joking?
>>73673251
>>73673453
LOL are these pics supposed to be cute
>>73670971
Lmao she isn't
I like grimes BUT GRIMESFAGS ARE THE WORSSSTTTT GETTT OUUTTTT BJORK IS THE BEST YOU FAGGOTS
>>73675935
>being this insane
>>73675935
That pic is the best
If I were lame enough to have a waifu, it would be her
>>73673746
Bjork became popular in an era when people still bought albums. Grimes, by contrast, got big well after people stopped buying physical LPs.
>>73673843
THIS is the image you use??
Yes.
ugly
>>73673453
she's got some cute big ass disney princess eyes. her music is still mediocre for the most part though. Bjork is the best female artist senpai
*blocks your path and helps make the best album of all time*
>>73670120
i like bjorks music more but id much rather have joanna sit on my face frankly speaking
>>73675935
bjork is adorable
>>73670309
fuck you
>>73671637
>I would like to know if there are any actual producers and musicians that are fans of her.
Yes.There are.
Claire!
>>73673328
>wasn't a sell out
A sell out to whom?
Why are grimesfags so consistently cancerous?