What is the greatest band/musician of all time? At the moment,

File: 1498549138943.jpg (51KB, 479x376px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 479x376px

Gucci mane is the greatest musician of all time
His IQ is extremely high also

>>73623056
>>of all time

hard question there op

>>73623056
>of all time
>At the moment

My answer is Animal Collective, both of all time and at the moment

>>73623092
The "At the moment" refers to "This is my opinion right now", because my opinion of which band is the best might change

1. Beatles
2. Pink Floyd
3. Led Zeppelin
4. Rolling Stones
5. Sonic Youth

>>73623102
Do you not know alot of music, or did you pick mainstream classic rock bands because you genuinely think it's the best music gets?

>>73623119
I genuinely think those are the 5 greatest discographies. Swans are about 80% meandering fillercore.

>>73623142
The first 50% of The Beatles discography is not very relevant, and Pink Floyd has some really weak albums throughout their discography (there are some masterpieces in there too, tho).

Neither of them reaches the level of Swans

>>73623160
I just listened to what I gathered were the 3 longest Swans songs and only the Glowing Man wasn't overflowing with filler. The one from To Be Kind and The Seer were the other two.

>>73623185
To Be Kind and The Seer have ZERO fillers, every track is a gem

>>73623056
I'm with you.

Greatest band - AMM
Greatest artist - Brian Ferneyhough

>>73623056
>i feel like that when they make a good album, it feels like it's way beyond music.
this is what i felt like when i saw them at primavera. It seemed like they were completely uninterested in the conventional uses of music. The sound they created was like a 6th band member. It was just there and everyone was feeling and interacting with it. Including the crowd. Truly transcendental concert.

>>73623056
Swans? they executed the same concept for 3 consecutive albums, only each time shittier than before. The seer was kinda alright, to be fair.

>>73623526
>3 completely different albums
>"They are all the same XD"

??????????????????

>>73623056
>What is the greatest band/musician of all time?
mark kozelek
swans will never be the great anything with how shitty gira lyrics are.

>>73623599
Gira lyrics are a work of a genius, are you serious?

>>73623636
>Gira lyrics are a work of a genius
examples?

>>73623641
"Now you be the mother and
I'll be your fool
I'll hide myself deep inside
Your crimson pool
The muddy water runs
Beneath your folds
You won't let me breathe;
You won't let me go
Now you'll be the stranger and
I'll be the white-skinned son
You'll blacken my innocence
With sugar and opium

The children were suffocating
Down in your damp cave
And you were the mother
And I was the sleeping slave
Protect me from violence
Hold me in your cool lips
You'll drug me with kindness
So I can pretend I exist
Now you be the only child
I'll suck on your breast
You'll feed me with gasoline
I'll burn my name in your head"

>>73623655
i like that song. but i still don't see the genius part

>>73623668
I guess we just have a different taste.

For me. just reading this lyrics has a substantial emotional impact on me

>>73623056
I like swans, but you sound like a hyped teenager.

File: Autechreelseq15.jpg (9KB, 316x315px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 316x315px

autechre obviously

>>73623705
I'm 22.

and most "Teenagers" don't know to appreciate something like Swans

>>73623599
>swans will never be the great anything with how shitty gira lyrics are.
bet your name is fuck

>>73623056
You are unequivocally the worst trip this board has ever had, and that's saying a whole fucking lot.

>>73623764
>and most "Teenagers" don't know how to appreciate something like Swans
Yeah, you're definitely a teeanger.
wew

>>73623681
ok what exactly in >>73623655 do you find genius? is there any particular part that means something to you or gives you a substantial emotional impact? what, if any, overall message do you think he trying to convey?

>>73623636
>YOUR NAME IS FUCK
What did he mean by this?

>>73623636
>CUNT SHIT SPACE CUNT
yeah a real genius

>>73623185
Don't talk shit about Swans until you've listened to SFTB from front to back.

third eye blind has better lyrics than this pretentious bullshit. neckbeardcore

>>73624148
you actually couldnt have made it more obvious that youre crazyaga

File: the-king-elvis-presley.jpg (161KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1280x960px

>>73623056

Elvis. 10/10 performer with a 10/10 voice. His influence on music, musicians, and culture in general will never be surpassed.

>>73624093
if you search these lyrics in the archives, you'll see plenty of people replying to a post like yours.
what i'm saying is, stop recycling old discussions ffs fags

>>73624018
Yours is also an act. Fuck off to youtube until you can think for yourself fag

>>73623056
I've gotta say The Cure.

>>73624227
???

>>73624215
i did, and no i didnt.
and i dont want anybodys opinion, i want crazyagas

>>73623092
>Greatest of all time
>Animal Collective
Lol.

>>73624235
Same

>>73624396
:( :( :( :(

>>73624262
>i did, and no i didnt.
l2 search

>i want crazyagas
w/e fag

>>73624093
The genius of it is the bleak, surreal atmosphere it creates. those lyrics, just like the music, create a world of their own.

>>73624780
I agree that the lyrics add a lot to the mood of the album, probably better than a lot of lyrics do, but i don't think that makes them genius

>>73623599
>implying Kozelek's lyrics are anything more than inane ramblings of a blogger

tired of his shtick tbqh, his lyricism is forthright to a point where there is nothing poetic about it

>>73625078
I think something doesn't have to reinvent the wheel to be genius. i think that creating this kind of powerful bleak atmosphere can also be considered genius.

>>73623056
I genuinely believe Death Grips are worth a shout for this, no meme. Creative, unique, thrilling and some legit great songwriting.

File: 14081434_10208522719044197_541081006_n.jpg (57KB, 960x710px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 960x710px

Radiohead duhhh.

Grimes senpai

>>73625214
/thread

We may as well end this shitty thread right here

>>73625214
/thread

We may as well end this shitty thread right here

>>73625214
/thread

We may as well end this shity thread right here

>>73625245
>>73625250
>>73625263
Act mature, Thom.

The Velvet Underground

>>73625214
Radiohead are great but they aren't at the same level of Swans in my opinion

Bob Dylan is objectively the most influential solo rock artist. Everyone from Gram Parsons to Chuck D to Patti Smith to Sly Stone has cited him an influence.

>>73623655
Holy fuck you're still here?

>>73625101
Listen to his pre-Benji albums you enormous fagtron. The rambly stuff is good in it's own right, but it's due to a pointed creative choice, not a lack of poetic ability.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhD3aG8J3pE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I2NUYf3efQ

>>73625302
what a shit opinion

>>73625302
>they aren't at the same level of Swans in my opinion

I agree they're much, much better. Swans has barely reached OKC levels of good

>>73625214
unironically this though and I am not a radiohead drone

File: radiohead25.jpg (66KB, 552x616px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 552x616px

>>73625353
This.

>>73625362
>>73625353
Man, i love radiohead, but they never made anything that is as emotionally impactful as Soundtracks For The Blind

>>73625302
I love all RH albums, the only ones that are (for me) less tan 8/10 are PH and TKOL, they have 3 of the most important pieces of art from the past 20 years Ok Computer, Kid A and In Rainbows

>>73625401
I could argue for In Rainbows but really how are we going to compare emotional density and impact? Entirely subjective subjects regardless of music knowledge

But like >>73625408 said they have objectively released three of the most important albums in the past two decades

>>73625408
In Rainbows is overrated as fuck. Amnesiac is better than In Rainbows.

Aniway, i'm not denying Radiohead made alot of great material, but look what Swans got in their discog: White Light, Soundtracks For The Blind, and the recent trilogy of 2010's albums.

Radiohead are maybe more popular than Swans, but they aren't better

File: 1434374604543.jpg (136KB, 1325x291px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1325x291px

>>73625463
Yes they are

>>73625463
>tfw swans has only made two albums that even remotely match the objective greatness of Kid A, OKC, Amnesiac, and IR
It sucks that Radiohead will stay the best band ever. Swans tried, and I respect their effort, but Radiohead will forever be objectively better.

>>73623160
The first half of the Beatles discography is dogshit bad. Love Me Do and I Wanna Hold Your Hand type shit, just downright terrible

>>73624187
You misspelled Chuck Berry

Crazyaga is the nigga of the world

>>73624187
This

>>73626193
Literally the only bad thing about early Beatles is the lyrics. Those songs are basically pop masterpieces and are far more musically interesting than they initially appear.

>>73625302
>the same level of Swans
Why should we take anything you say seriously you retard?

>>73625426
Exactly. Emotional impact isn't something that can be universally measured. I love Swans, they're one of my all time favourites, but they have never had the same emotional impact on me as Kid A has. Not yet anyway.

>>73624187
>>73626215
Stop pretending to like shitty 50's Rock n' Roll, this thread is about best music, not influential music that aged badly

>>73625463
You are acting like a 12 year old.

>>73626418
>this thread is about best music
>not influential music
Since quality is purely subjective, then one can only judge music by it's objective properties: how influential it was.

>>73626215

"Describe Elvis Presley? He was the greatest who ever was, is or ever will be."

- Chuck Berry

>>73623102
you forgot Queen fellow 9gagger

>>73626193
Have you ever been in love anon?

>>73626418

>Elvis
>Chuck Berry
>aged badly


neck yourself you shit eating pleb

>>73626434
Do you prefer to listen to Elvis Presley and Chuck Berry over Swans and Radiohead?

>>73626474
>prefer
Not relevant.

>>73626464
Oh yeah it doesn't sound cheesy at all

>>73626487
To be fair, Swans sounds fairly cheesy

>uuggghhh I'm so edgy and the world is so terrible
>droning chords for 20 minutes
kek

>>73626482
These faggot that try way too hard to seem like they understand soo much about music ruin these fucking threads, nobody cares if Elvis Presley is influential, his music is fucking garbage

>>73626502
>Droning chords for 20 minutes
Literally when

>>73626504
>my opinion on the quality of his music is...
Not relevant.

See >>73626434

>>73626418
We have Swans in the OP so it's neither about best nor influential music you retard

>>73626519
Hope faggots like you die so that we can stop regarding shit like Chuck Berry and those shitty old artist as the greatest of all time when their music stopped being enjoyable 60 years ago

>>73626561
>enjoyable
Not relevant.

Please pay attention. We already covered this.

>>73626541
No they have to come in here and pretend that they actually enjoy nigger rock n roll

>>73626595
>mommy they are enjoying black people music wah stop it

>>73626589
>This dead faggot made music that influenced artists I like, so his music is objectively better, even though it sounds like shit. Yes and the first photograph is a better work of art than The Godfather then.

>>73626627
Whom are you quoting?

amidst all this it becomes clear that CAN is actually the best band

>>73626648
Was just using your logic, the last sentence wasn't meant to be included in the greentext though

>>73623056
Noone is the greatest, there comes a certain point where musicians/composers are equal in their ability to write music. You can't say that Elliot Carter is better than Charles Mingus at writing music and vice versa. It just comes down to personal taste at that point.

>>73626193
they are fantastic fuck you

>>73626692
>Was just using your logic
You couldn't have because you said
>made music that influenced artists I like
When I never stated what I liked, and have even stated repeatedly that what I like is not relevant.

See >>73626434 since you seem to be confused.

>>73626715
Can't you just talk about music you like? Nobody cares what you saw The Rolling Stone saying was the best artist, you are not patrician just a massive faggot

>>73623056
>>73623097
>>73623119
>>73623160
>>73623192
>>73623577
>>73623636
>>73623655
>>73623681
>>73623764
>>73624780
>>73625107
>>73625302
>>73625401
>>73625463
All of you - go fuck yourself. you bully for months, you hurted me, you made me cry, and now it gotten even worse.

I shared my life story with you, i shared with you the pain i have experienced, expecting you to show some sympathy.. but instead your just ridiculing me and keep bullying me.

The pain i have experienced in my life is indescribeable, and the fact you derive joy from the pain of others is fucking gross. any of you who experienced joy from my pain is a evil human being and he should be ashamed of yourself.

How can you be so emotionless?

How can you be so cruel?

How can you derive joy from knowing the other one is suffering? i fucking suffered from clinical depression, and you guys ridicule my life story.

I was allways so nice towards all of you, told you that i wish you the best in your life, told you that i love you all... but you just kept bullying me. what if i was suicidal? would you really want to have the guilt of making a person kill himself for the rest of your life?

Im not going to suicide, but if it was someone else it could have ended this way, and thats why you all should be ashamed of yourself and to change your attitude from now on.

>>73626753
>Can't you just talk about music you like?
That's not what this thread is about. Feel free to start a Music You Like thread and I'll discuss it there
>you are not patrician
Oh what instrument do you play?

>>73623599
>>73625101
Honestly Gira and Kozelek are my two favorite musicians.

>>73626754
What happened I'm confused

>>73624374
whats yours then pussy

>>73626762
Been playing drums since 12, decend bassist

>>73626444
Sounds like a Chuck was very humble and brainwashed like everyone else

>>73623119
>>73626445
you must be 18 or older to use this site

>>73626787
How long have you been studying music theory?
>Been playing drums since 12
Only four years of playing an instrument really isn't enough to be considered patrician btw.

Dead Crips :DDDDD

>>73626627
It's not really that his music is better objectively, and to be fair I was only trying to tell the one anon that Elvis Presley would be lucky to lick shit from Chuck Berry's shoes

>>73626434
What makes influence the most important objective property of music?

>>73626798
About 3 or 2 years

>>73626876
Well, what else is there?
>>73626893
Oh you've only been playing drums for 3 years?

>>73626901
Taste is subjective, but the quality of music and the quality of taste is pretty objective.

How can any one band be the best band of all time?
For me though I think David Bowie had a huge impact musically and culturally. Same with the Beatles (obv when they got high af)

>>73626921
>but the quality of music and the quality of taste is pretty objective.
How so? How is it measured?

>>73626901
No, I've been playing for 6 years, only started learning theory recently

>>73627024
So you are definitely not a patrician, sorry.

>>73627036
Did I say I was? I don't care about your retarded buzzword

>>73623056
Why haven't you killed yourself?

>>73627036
What's the cutoff point for patricianhood?

>>73627047
See >>73626753

File: 1479580858169.jpg (23KB, 407x482px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 407x482px

>>73626754
good post

>>73627079
I didn't say I was, I said you aren't

>>73626754

pasta?

>>73627151
see >>73624396

im sure most of the following are him as well
>>73623322
>>73623993
>>73624148
>>73624215
>>73624227
>>73624408
>>73624616

File: Sun-Ra_Changed-my-life[1].png (632KB, 665x400px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 665x400px

Fuck Swans AND Radiohead

Sun Ra

>>73626675
this

their discography may not be as consistent but every release from Monster Movie to Soon Over Babaluma is downright incredible

>>73627144
If you weren't one, you wouldn't be able to recognize one or not.

Nice try though

>>73626949
If a piece of music is interesting, and cohesive as a idea then it is objectively good. This means a lot of /mu/core is bad because it is not interesting musically. A interesting piece of music can be weighted rhythmically, harmonically, melodically, the use of tonal center modulation, key modulation, instrumentation, and production.

>>73627294
>interesting
Subjective
>cohesive
Subjective
>good
Subjective

I'm asking your for objective measurements, not subjective ones. Were you paying attention to the question? Try again

>>73627258
I'm honestly fine with this. Good taste.

>>73626901
I don't know what else there is, but using influence as an objective meter discounts about a decade's worth of music that's too new to even have influence.

>>73627277
There is no such thing as a patrician, all that time you spent listening to music you actually hate really was a waste, nobody cares.

>>73627371
>too new to even have influence.
Sounds like a great equalizer that cancels out hype and current fads that younger "listeners" could confuse as greatness
>>73627376
>There is no such thing as a patrician
Of course there is. Is this your first week on mu?
>music you actually hate
Oh what do I listen to?

>>73627435
Fads can't create great music?

>>73627456
If they can, you won't know it until at least 10 years later

>>73627323
You are implying all those are subjective and I proved it in my post they are not, what do I need to make more clear?

>>73627470
So I should pass judgement on everything released recently in case it's part of a fad?

>>73627496
>You are implying all those are subjective
What is interesting or not is subjective. Do you know what "interesting" means?
>and I proved it in my post they are not
What? Where was this? You lead off specifically with subjective criteria (I find this interesting/cohesive/good).

>>73627545
>A interesting piece of music can be weighted rhythmically, harmonically, melodically, the use of tonal center modulation, key modulation, instrumentation, and production.
If a main idea of a song has a rhythm of straight 8th notes for 4 bars using the chord progressions C major -> A minor then it's a bad musical idea, made even worse if used with the usual voicings. Using the same rhythm but instead it's Am -> B7 -> Cmaj7 -> Em progression the same simple 8th note rhythm is made interesting and is better than the other progression I mentioned. The more complex progression will always be better if it is also cohesively executed. This is just a simple example using two factors, rhythm and harmony, you still have instrumentation and production at your disposal to make the simple Cmaj -> Am progression sound interesting but without those factors the simple progression is objectively worse.

>>73627371
Scaruffi may weight his criteria a bit more heavily toward influence but I think it's meant to be used as one of the few, more objective factors you can judge about a band. But even then, it's more about innovation rather than influence

>>73627500
Do whatever you want.
>>73627679
>bad musical idea
Subjective.
>simple
So? Are you putting a *subjective* value to this? Simple can be good, bad, or anything you want. You are subjectifying it
>better
Subjective.

Let me phrase it in a way you might comprehend:
>this is just a simple example using two factors, rhythm and harmony
Rhythm and harmony or objective traits of music, yes. Your assessment of their uses being "good" or "bad" are subjective.

Hence, you are still using subjective criteria, which is not what I am asking.

I literally only see one person here who's said The Velvet Underground, and zero who've said Miles Davis. That's upsetting. Since idk anything about classical, I'd say one of them, easily, even if they're cliche answers.

>>73623056
Beethoven, Bach or Mozart.

>pop/rock
lls

>>73623065
bilo bi vrijeme da staneš

File: imrs.jpg (45KB, 480x319px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 480x319px

Phil Ochs

>>73627723
I can't help you if you are subjectifying everything and are also incapable of reading comprehension and musical comprehension but one more time and I'll try my damned hardest to make it clear.
If you have a musical idea that has one factor that is simple and another factor that is simple versus another musical idea that has one factor that is simple and another factor that is complex then the 2nd musical idea I stated is objectively better than the 1st musical idea I stated. If multiple factors for a piece of music is simple then it's a worse musical idea than a piece of music that has many interesting factors, the simplicity of the music makes it worse than a more complex piece of music because it has been done before. That is why I said the simple progression is worse than the more complex progression because the simple progression has been done many times before and the more complex has not been used many times before, therefore the more complex progression is better in the context I created. This is objective and just saying it's all subjective is a shit argument.

>>73627742
TVU are a footnote in music history son

>>73627906
>I can't help you if you are subjectifying everything
Me? No I'm pretty sure you mean this post here >>73627679
Did you lose track of who you are replying to?
>>73627906
>complex is objectively better than simple
Why? Please do not use any subjective value in your answer or it will be discarded.
>This is objective
I've already demonstrated it is not.
>and just saying it's all subjective is a shit argument.
I already told you of the only way it could be objective. Read the thread if you forgot.

>>73623056
Every time I visit this board I'm more convinced that it's all just a big joke.

>>73627941
Well that's not true, but even if it were, we're talking about "best," not "most significant to musical history."

>>73627966
It is. Never take anything seriously here. Ever. It's all post-post-post ironic.

>>73627971
>"most significant to musical history."
That's what best would be. Read the thread

>>73627986
The thread's about the greatest artist/band. If it were about influence, everyone would just say The Beatles, but it's not -- it's about how good the music is.

>>73627971
please read the entire thread and don't just pop in at random spots

>>73628005
>it's the greatest if I like it the best!
Not how it works.

>>73627966
It's not. some people here are ironic, but most of the discussion is legitimate music disussion

>>73628022
Considering the subjective nature of music, that's exactly how it works

>>73627966
this website is a big joke dumb nig

>>73628036
You. Gay autist. Literally.

>>73627761
Mozart is catchy light pop compared to Swans

>>73627944
You are nitpicking with greentext again because you have no argument. Goodbye.

>>73628055
then your already stupid thread becomes even more pointless unless you're looking for someone to circle jerk with you that Swans is indeed GOAT or whatever

If you don't acknowledge the objectivity in music, you're not """discussing""" anything I shouldn't even have to explain this

>>73628055
See >>73626434
Please read the thread before posting.

>>73628081
>you have no argument.
Already posted it earlier in the thread.

In contrast, you still have yet to give me an objective measure of music.

You won't be have to because your have no argument .

File: 1494303584135.jpg (23KB, 284x284px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 284x284px

>>73628087
I'm the one who made this thread i decide the rules.

This is about subjective taste, not about influence

>>73628086
I stopped arguing with OP when he tried talking arguing emotional impact you should do the same

>>73628086
I think that's his entire point?

He wants a Swans wank off thread he didn't actually come to discuss who or who isn't the greatest band

>>73628109
>>73628086
You are both really silly.

If a band plays one chord and your mind perceives it as a masterpiece, then it is a masterpiece for you.

How good music is 100% depends on the brain of the people who listens to it

>>73628132
keep taking the easy way out

I subjectively think that your thinking about music is wrong what do you say now silly

>>73623056
My Bloody Valentine brings you into better trance

>>73628106
>This is about subjective taste, not about influence
Not stated in OP

Also your taste follows whatever is popular on /mu/, so you really have no place to say on anything.

>>73628164
you are making presumptions about me, you sould really silly right now.

The fact i love Swans has nothing to do with their popularity in /mu/. Kanye is popular on /mu/ too and i think he is mediocre

>>73628164
BTFO OP

>>73628186
>you are making presumptions about me
No this is based on seeing your posts for the last 5 years.
>Kanye is popular on /mu/ too and i think he is mediocre
You wouldn't shut up about him like 3-4 years ago. You might fool the summerfags but not me

>>73628164
>Also your taste follows whatever is popular on /mu/, so you really have no place to say on anything

kek

>>73628205
Is this now an exposing crazyaga thread?

>>73628205
tripfag getting rekt in real time in his own thread

>>73628205
Wdf i never said i like Kanye, i always said i think he is mediocre

>>73628242
>>73628220
But he is just making things up that are not even true! i literally always said kanye is mediocre

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 13.33.42.png (9KB, 594x119px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 594x119px

>>73628298
>>73628282
Cry more about it faggot

>>73628129
this. he posted an equally embarrassing thread about the bodylovers yesterday.

>>73628334
lmao please more this is the only entertaining thread Ive seen all day

>>73626754
this post is why I'm always confused why crazyaga gets a pass. why don't we bully him on sight still?

>>73628334
tippity top kek

>>73628298
Do you love Radiohead and Death Grips?

>>73628334
>>73628374
Crying to good music is a good thing you plebs, it means im a very involved listener

>>73628394
is crazyaga clips4lyfe?

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 13.39.19.png (7KB, 587x80px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 587x80px

>>73628394
Does Metallica make you cry?

>>73626754
this is why you shouldnt use tripcodes

>>73628434
Nope, but i actually stand by the statement in that screenshot.

Lulu and St Anger really aren't that bad, that's my honest opinion. call me a contrarian, i don't care

File: Bob-Dylan-006.jpg (33KB, 460x276px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 460x276px

Bob Dylan

>>73628394
youd legitimately be the best poster on this board if everything youve said was ironic

>>73628474
Buddy, alot of people cry when they listen to incredibly emotional music. that's not only a natural reaction, its a desired reaction because it means you are very involved with the music

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 13.47.29.png (9KB, 598x111px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 598x111px

Got any vinyls yet?

>>73628559
Nope i still don't have any.

Also read the context of the conversation, someone asked if i call my vinyl records "Vinyls", and i said i don't because i don't have vinyls

I hate /mu/ and everyone ITT with bad taste

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 13.51.25.png (8KB, 578x97px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 578x97px

Words of wisdom, by crazyaga

>>73628632
This is about the album of art of The Magic Whip by blur. they use Chinese letters in the album art

Why are you pretending this is an embarrassing statement?

>>73628632
honestly I can't say he's wrong with this one

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 13.53.16.png (7KB, 584x77px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 584x77px

WHOA GUYS HE'S GIFTED DON'T FUCK WITH HIM

>>73628663
And this is something you think is "embarrassing"? i'm within the top 1% of the population in terms of IQ

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 13.55.43.png (8KB, 599x86px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 599x86px

You sure do cry a lot

>>73628700
Honestly what you are doing right now is more autistic and embarrassing than anything i did

>>73623056

theres not answner for it beacause it is very subjetive

im form argentina and if u ask me i ll tell u Patricio Rey y sus Redonditos de Ricota a band that are safe u mister gringo never hear about but here are in my country his only singer make a concert with 300k people only for see him

>>73628715
no you making a who is the greatest band of all time thread then going on an autistic tirant about why every other answer besides Swans is wrong was autistic

This is just funny

so what does everyone like to do when listening to the greatest band/musician of all time?
for me personally i like to kick back and play one of my all time favourite canvasrider tracks by the very respected trackmaker and greatest trial maker fried rider: http://canvasrider.com/tracks/1463041. it's actually one of the longest tracks made in the history of the game

>>73628715
Kill yourself seriously

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 14.01.22.png (8KB, 582x92px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 582x92px

>>73628748
I'm surprised he didn't say metallica or Coldplay

>>73628771
Never, there are too many incredible experiences left for me to experience

>>73628748
I didn't say other answers beside Swans are wrong, we just had a discussion and shared our opinions

>>73628813
I said Coldplay made some decent albums, i didn't say they are anywhere near one of the best you silly

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 14.05.51.png (12KB, 723x140px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 723x140px

>>73628836
So, you think Metallica and Coldplay are better than The Beatles?

>>73628900
They made better albums than Revolver and The White Album that's for fucking sure.

Abbey Road and SGT Peppers are legitimately really good tho so idk about that

>>73628900
tbf i think revolver is a 5 at best
so many shitty songs

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 14.12.37.png (8KB, 583x103px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 583x103px

>>73628928
Sorry The Beatles aren't as great as Barzum!!

>>73629028
You are comparing two completely different things here, but i did enjoy the best burzum albums more than the best beatles album. have that.

Ween is definitely the best band of all time
Greatest musician is too broad

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 14.18.24.png (10KB, 573x141px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 573x141px

wow Crazyaga sounds like a great kid to hang out with

>>73629120
You are trying way too hard man. none of this were even remotely embarassing

File: Ænima Album Artwork.jpg (164KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 600x600px

tool

File: Screenshot 2017-06-28 13.45.21.png (73KB, 712x329px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 712x329px

>>73629142
That's fine. We still have plenty of examples of /mu/ creating your taste

File: Screenshot_01.png (3KB, 794x23px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 794x23px

>>73629142
didnt you post in another forum that you once tried to breastfeed your cat?

I'm a meme but honestly the competence of Mr. Bungle is incredibly impressive.

>>73629235
Literally never, wtf

>>73629685
it was on the dream theatre forum

>crazyaga
this nigga still alive

>>73629780
I never said anything like that there

>>73629780
he browsed a dream theater forum? holy fucking shit dude

>>73629869
I never was a fan of dream theater, i browsed it only because alot of Devin Townsend fans were also there

>>73629869
yeah, he made almost 800 posts there

>>73629924
Yes but look where the posts were. almost all of them were at the "other music" section, not the dream theater sections

>>73623056
Hmmmm, probably the band who released Revolver.

There's so many artists I want to include, I'll through out five that have a pretty perfect and influential discography:

A Tribe Called Quest
The Smiths
Talking Heads
The Velvet Underground
CAN

>>73629142
the embarassing part comes from you, responding to it, defending your own cringyness.

>>73630183
this is actually a great list

Bach
Beethoven
Mozart
Brahms
Schubert
Mendelssohn
Stockhausen

File: 960.jpg (128KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 960x540px

Easy.

>>73628471
this x1000000000

>>73626754
unty?

I haven't read all the comments, but I'm assuming at least one person so far has named John Coltrane. If not, shame on this board.

There is no real awnser to this question. But if you asked me who's music impresses the most and is best crafted, then I'd say JS Bach.

crazyaga the kind of nigga that eats his own cum

>>73626754
>suicidal
>Swans is his favorite band

checks out

>>73634687
I'm not even close to suicidal

Miles Davis.

>>73626434
Or you can judge it by your own subjective standards, with the understanding that other people are going to disagree with you on your judgements and can't be convinced otherwise.

And even influence is subjective to an extent, because we have to make value judgements that separate good influences from bad ones.

>>73623056
Brian Eno. I don't think there's ever been a person directly involved in so many classic albums.

>>73634711
>>73634942
this too.

>>73626711
>They are fantastic
In what way?

>>73623102
where's nirvana, bitch boy?

>>73636868
>greatest band of all time
>nirvana
i like them but they're not even the best at what they were attempting