Is it hipster to have an eclectic/wide-reaching taste in music?

>>73577341
Is that's the case more than half of /mu/ are hipsterd

>>73577341
it shows you have no palate

>>73577388
>more than half of /mu/ are hipsters
shit guess it's correct then

>>73577411
elaborate?

>>73577595
>elaborate?
jack of all trades master of none. you most likely just listen to little more than entry lvl of everything.
lets say for example top 10 maybe 20 rym charts of all those "genres" you enjoy.

its okay if you wanna be a future dj or samplist i guess.

>>73577341
Depends on what you mean by hipster.
If you're talking about a movement of American youths criticising consumerist society by engaging in activities and art ignored by it, then yeah.
If you're talking about the 21st century fashion movement towards faux-alternative art and sweatshop clothes that look older than they are, then nah.

>>73577341
yes, but it has always been that way, in every generation that has been part of the definition of hipster

No, listening to a bunch of different music does not make you a hipster.

Hipsters are people that follow the latest trends that are just outside of mainstream trends-- listening to a bunch of different music does not make sense in that definition.

>>73579300
What genres would you consider yourself a master of?

If you go and tell everyone about it all the damn time, then yes. But if that's the case you probably have bigger problems.

>>73579355
>If you're talking about a movement of American youths criticising consumerist society by engaging in activities and art ignored by it, then yeah.
>If you're talking about the 21st century fashion movement towards faux-alternative art and sweatshop clothes that look older than they are, then nah.
These two are so hardly different it makes me assume you engage in one of them and are trying to justify it to yourself.

why do people make so many threads that try to make other people feel like shit?

>>73580239
insecurities