damn
>>73551160
is anyone still thinking that lyrics arent important after that? fuck you
>>73551176
not sure what you mean
>>73551200
I mean that those retards who're saying that lyrics arent important got literlly BTFO
should I replace the regular OKC in my library with this or should I skip it because loudness memes
>>73551221
Ahhh right I gotchu
>>73551249
listen and decide for yourself
>>73551160
GTFO WHO ELSE HAS TWO ALBUMS IN THE TOP 10 OTHER THAN KENDRICK
>>73551249
The tracks themselves (obviously) don't sound vastly different. Some tracks like Subterranean sound a bit cleaner, but thats all really. You might as well replace it, as its the same album with extra songs which are fucking neat
>>73551176
They aren't.
>>73551453
Kid A would definitely been in the top 10. It's just that critics went retarded and gave it negative reviews because it wasn't "muh alt rock".
an equation:
oknotok = ok computer remaster + how am i driving EP (1998) + Lift + Man of War + I Promise + How I made millions
it's so unspectacular if you've already heard the "how am i driving" EP
woah
>>73551584
how i made my millions is an odd track title considering that album is literally how they made their millions
>>73551160
>overrated band get highest score
nothing new here
>genre: pop rock
wtf i hate radiohead now
>>73551160
U2 has a 93 and a 95
>>73551160
>album gets 'universal acclaim' because websites will get butchered for going against the popular opinion
>>73551249
>"""remastered"""
No surprises (heh) here, the album is agreed to be a classic these days so of course the special edition or whatever will get perfect scores. Just like Sgt. Peppers.
>>73551176
They certainly don't make a track good or bad. They can enhance a track very slightly but that's it. Not very important though.