Will King Gizzard ever top this?
Watch Anthony give this a 10. I'm serious, take notes
>>73535651
Yeah later this year WITH THEIR THIRD ALBUM OF THE YEAR
You're all blinded by your obsession.
>>73535760
>>73535760
why would anyone care about what reviewers think of the album?
Can't you make your own opinions?
>>73535793
I said the same thing about Nickleback but nobody agreed that my opinions were as valid as basically every single critic cobined :(
>>73535820
if you enjoy then just go with it man
>>73535791
These are people who literally don't like that it's a narrative. I fucking loved Eyes Like the Sky because it was a commitment of a narrative.
"this record requires a huge narrative commitment"
Like as if the whole point of the album is bad
>>73535791
>comparing king gizz to king crimson
krautrock gizz is boring and lame... why is this board so hard for them?
still think 12 bar bruise is their best desu
link?
>>73535887
yeah but the argument is that the reward a listener gets from fully committing to the narrative is not worth the time... it's not like a narrative automatically makes something good.
>>73535791
what exactly is pompous and pretentious about any aspect of this album at all? i seriously do not understand reviews sometimes...
fuck you nu-males and your garbage band
>>73535791
lol the negative ones are accurate as hell desu
>>73535981
anyone daring to have any kind of concept going into an album nowadays are bound to get labelled 'pretentious' unfortunately
>>73535981
You have to approach a narrative different than a "reward". It seems silly, the end of the narrative is the universe is confused and destroyed, who hears that and is just. "meh that was pretentious"
It's Metacritic though, and they always have sht between 60-80 because it's not a real review site