What is the equivilent to this for each decade? starting from

>>73459957
80's: nothing
90's: nothing
00's: nothing
10's: fucking nothing

You cant replace dsotm

80's - The Queen Is Dead
90' - The Mollusk
00's - In Rainbows
10's -?

File: thom-york-3.jpg (74KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 350x350px

>>73459957
>90's: nothing
nope

File: artworks-000005754709-2wiqma-t500x500.jpg (87KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 500x500px

90s

>>73459957
00's - deathconsciousness

File: tool360.jpg (62KB, 360x360px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 360x360px

>>73459957
00's - lateralus

>>73460042
came to post this.

File: 71X-d84NtNL._SL1077_.jpg (129KB, 1077x1076px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1077x1076px

dark side of the 2000s right here

File: a1955172301_10.jpg (210KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1200x1200px

>>73459957
2010s

>>73459957
So albums that look better on t-shirts than in a record player?

80s: That Joy Division album with all the radio waves
90s: The big Sublime sun thing
00s: - Anything with the HIM heartagram logo
10s - eh, I don't know

File: The-Perfect-Prescription-cover.jpg (347KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 1500x1500px

1980s

>>73460250
10s would be blurryface by this logic

>>73460250
they're pulsar waves, not radio waves

File: Piero.jpg (7KB, 209x204px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 209x204px

>>73459957
6.5/10

File: 8652220757a55991b2073b5effa1df9e.500x500x1.jpg (50KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 500x500px

>>73460131
you're projecting, like those lights are projecting, this is the one

File: 0000031284.1349786686orig.jpg (290KB, 1400x1400px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1400x1400px

90s

>>73460362
They're radio waves being emitted by a pulsar from a 1977 encyclopedia of astronomy

>>73459957
80's: The Hounds of Love or The Queen is dead
90's: Ok Computer
00's: Illinoise or Kid A
10's: No idea. A Moon Shaped Pool (?)

File: 5d4990ac0ca2f5da80a43dcf5531ca2b.800x800x1.jpg (229KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 800x800px

2010's

>>73460250

But Unknown Pleasures came out in 1979.

>>73460793
they're most associated with the 80s though

>>73460996
Lol no

>>73460040
>The Mollusk
One of the best smilecore albums ever released.

>>73461230
seconding daft punk for the 2000s

>>73460250
10s is Sunbather

>>73461373
based Bungleposter

>>73461147
y'all think the cure is an 80s band even though they formed, got signed and started getting big in the 70s... Soundgarden is a 90s band, even though they got signed and started getting big in the 80s.

HIM is a 2000s band even though every midle-school girl in 1998 was drawing heartagrams on their notebooks

>>73459957
You mean album only normies enjoy but inexplicably keeps selling?

Umm, Thriller, Nevermind, some album from the 00's and Teenage Dream

80 dunno
90 OKC
00 KID A
10 TPAB

>>73460040
>posts garbage albums
Fitting since DSotM is trash too

>>73460131
>>73460385
Ok, but the same artist that made the cover for DSOTM made the Mars Volta debut cover art
>>73460042
The only true parallel

>>73460040
MBDTF or TPAB?

>>73460363
>Rather than just endorsing the stereotypes of easy-listening, Pink Floyd invented a whole new kind of easy-listening with Dark Side Of The Moon (1973) and Wish You Were Here (1975).

>>73462780
he later calls it "living room psychedelia" in his ok computer review.

>>73461923
Bands can exist in multiple decades you dunce.

File: download (1).jpg (9KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x225px

Thoughts on this album?

>>73463126
dogshit

>>73460432
proved me wrong, sorry desu

You could argue it owns the 80s too considering it was a top seller for like 3 decades

>73462239
Whoa watch out guys, we got a TRUE PATRICIAN over here.


Faggot

>>73462902
Radiohead, Swans?