this meme isnt dead yet

7 would be a more accurate rating desu

>>73437920
Shitty then, a shitty today

>>73437958
feck off if pet sounds isnt a 10 then i dont know what is

pet sounds is a 6

>>73437920
say whatever you want but at least they were really independent and not scared to insult even classics like pet sounds.

The 90's were weird, man

>>73438093
then why did they remove that rating and change it to a 9.4

If they were actually reviewing the 90's stereo mix the 7.5 might be deserved, but nobody on Pitchfork ever comments on sound quality since they don't actually listen to anything

>>73438595
were

at one time, they were independent

>>73438628
yep
>discusses an artist's career for 4 paragraphs
>calls out 1 or 2 tracks for being "problematic"
>anyway 9.4

>>73437920
>comparing it to these albums that wouldn't exist without it, you'll find that it's shit
this is huh, wow

At least old p4k had balls, nupitchfork is on another level of trash

>>73438778
but having balls doesn't make up for poor writing. this review's going against the grain, sure, but it sucks ass for other reasons.

that review is nothing compared to "shit, cat"

File: 1497645859107.png (81KB, 503x571px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 503x571px

>>73439020
Thanks for reminding me of that travesty

>>73439020
>>73439234
lmfao i remember when this review was pasted a month ago, some kid thought it was a real post and called it "breathtaking"

>>73439234
Christ how embarassing.

Slightly unrelated but I was just reminded of this.

Does anyone have a link to that review of Arctic Monkey's AM where they call it the pinnacle of music and compare it to Kid A?

>>73439382
isn't that nme