blur vs oasis

File: oasis or blur.jpg (51KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 480x480px

>>73345003
oasis, obviously

>>73345003
bunch of cunts

File: liam gallagher.png (22KB, 613x229px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 613x229px

>blur

>>73345003
essentially southern middle class vs northern working class

Blur's S/T is better than anything Oasis has ever released so Blur

>>73345785
What about 13?

I like Oasis more. But I do think Blur are better musicians.

I dont listen to any one of them on a regular basis though.

>>73345003
/mu/ would have been too busy listening to American Indie Rock to care, but they'd have probably gone with Blur

>>73345003
Pulp

>>73345003
Radiohead

desu all of oasis songs sound like the same to me. i still enjoy listening to live forever, morning glory etc sometimes, they do have a lot of iconic pop songs
blur are more diverse, experimental and more fun imo. i wouldnt listen to their albums front to back on a regular basis but i really enjoy their singles. i like how they get really ironic and tongue in cheek with their social critique and also make stuff like beetlebum that feels so raw and emotional to me

in 1994-1996 - definitely oasis
but generally blur. later oasis albums are not even close to dm n mg.

>>73345973
this tbqh, different class

oasis

oasis is for lads

blur is for people who post in sissy hypno threads