Why is this LP so good?
>>73330234
i mean its the strongest in Cudis discography but its waaaaayyyy too long and its a little too weed/coke lmao at times. its mostly held together by its great features and top notch production, along with the Ye factor. it proves that Cudi cant get his act together without loads of help.
i used to think it was a classic in high school tho, and its still a decent listen
Man on the moon was his best
>>73330234
The production, that's it.
Kid Cudi is a shit lyricist and singer.
>>73330291
How do u feel about the first installment.