Start to Finish listening albums

>listening to anything but entire albums start to finish

>>73288157
You are a fucking idiot

What? No one has an album they do this with?

Albums are meant to be listened through from start to finish you silly goofball

>>73288202
You're a pleb.

File: 5645664653.jpg (123KB, 1185x1318px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1185x1318px

>>73288142
>>73288202
>>73288288
bleb

>>73288142
is this normie general?

>>73288142
Literally all of them.

>>73288454
>>73288469
>>73288157
Obviously new to /mu/ and trying to fit it in. Very few artists have that intent on an album and even if hey do most of them aren't worth a shit to do so .

I listen to all albums in full

>>73288495
>Very few artists have that intent on an album
Well that's wrong.
>even if hey do most of them aren't worth a shit to do so
King Crimson did it for 8/9 consecutive albums.

Daft Punk - Discovery is really easily digestible as a whole. It's probably one of the first albums I listened to all the way through.

>>73288142
>>73288288
tier 1 plebs (normies)

>>73288157
>>73288427
>>73288436
>>73288448
>>73288454
>>73288469
tier 2 plebs (rockists)

>>73288202
>>73288495
tier 3 plebs (contrarians)

Listen to the music in whichever way suits you best! =)

I can listen to most my favourite albums from start to finish though, so the question is silly since I think most people here do that anyway as often as they can.

>>73288582
No the question is not silly.
I agree that you should listen to music in a way that suits you at that moment. I'm not stating that ALL albums should/or can be listening too in one sitting.
I'm only asking which albums YOU listen to that way?

>>73288699
EVERY SINGLE ONE

>>73288540
tier 4 plebs (shitposters)

If you don't listen to an album from start to finish you might as well wanna go back to top 40 playlists

I usually listen to full albums because when I choose one I am setting myself up to a specific experience. When I know I only have time to listen to a few songs though I choose random songs that I feel like listening at the moment

>>73288733
shitposting is patrician

File: (You).jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>73288540

I try to listen to every album start to finish when I'm getting into an artist. I don't like listening to one song because that doesn't define the band/artist.

When it is a prog album, I listen to the whole album. So what?

It's a pretty cool sub-genre

>>73289216
>listening to prog
ISHYGDDT

>>73288745
Oh my fucking god you stupid fucking shitbird.
When you listen to it for the first time of course you will listen to the whole album. I'm talking of albums in your library that, upon subsequent listening, you tend to listen to the whole album (or most of it) in that single setting.
Fucking dipshit pseudo-eletist /mu/ faggot.

>>73290592
Go listen to kendrick lamar or something faggot

So you guys never want to listen to just a single song from an album? Or if you want to listen to for example the 7th song on the album then you listen to the whole album?
I get the whole-album experience but cmon.

>>73288540
/////////////////////thread

>>73288142
most of them desu

File: The_Glowing_Man_(Front_Cover).jpg (101KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 300x300px

>>73288142
cannot pause this album

>>73290592
Albums aren't a collection of singles. The reason why an artist makes an album is because they intend for you to listen to it from start to finish in one sitting. They make the songs so that they fiit together, kind of like a story. There's an introduction, rising action, a climax, and a conclusion. You're supposed to listen to an album all the way through in the same way you'd read a novel from start to finish or watch a movie from start to finish. It's ridiculous to say you don't watch your movies all the way through, or you only skip to certain parts and watch those parts. It's the same way with albums.

>>73291245
or any album in that trilogy

>>73291375
no, TBK is mediocre from start to finish and The Seer has that abomination 93 Ave B Blues right in the center of the album

If you have time to constantly listen to whole projects in one sitting, you need to do something about it.

>>73291401
Agree on TBK but 93 Ave Blues I think fits very well in the album, like it's The Seer having a complete mental breakdown from knowing too much

>>73291484
What? If you have an hour at the end of the day to yourself, you're doing life wrong?

>>73288142
Are you like 7 years old or something? Actually fuck that, at that age I was still listening to full albums. Go away.

Swans is the only band I can't sit and listen to entire albums of.

>>73291500
it's thematically sound, but I don't enjoy listening to it. oh, well

>>73291484
I usually listen while I work, so it's not like I'm actually sitting

>>73291401
nigga 93 ave b blues is absolutely mandatory for the complete seer experience, you're just an absolute weakling for not being able to sit through it

tbk is highly subjective though

File: coil_amberlamps.jpg (69KB, 500x456px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 500x456px

A lot of live albums are easy to listen to start-to-finish because of the energy, and because live sets often have better pacing than studio albums in terms of song selection.

>>73290592
You're the cancer that is plaguing this board

File: 1487966596788.png (313KB, 539x435px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 539x435px

>People don't listen to whole albums

File: 1494107240121.jpg (87KB, 640x785px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 640x785px

>>73289287
>not listening to prog