>tfw Grimes filler>most other songs

>>73269248
grimes makes no filler dumb

>>73270028
grimes makes nothing but filler dumb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWam7u9uBNY

>>73269248
I see this chick posted on /mu/ constantly so i listened to some of her songs and it's just generic pop garbage. how does the music board have such shit taste in music

>>73270153
wew cool lets celebrate my brother

>>73270160
It's all just a big misunderstanding
Somebody spammed a bunch of female """artists""" once to get people mad and now there are people here who unironically like Grimes and other popsters

>>73270160
>generic pop garbage
nice bait

>>73270079
dumb opinion

>>73270160
>generic pop garbage
what is generic about her music? post similar music or gtfo.

>>73270252
Try any 80's electro pop or new wave
Grimes is so far behind the scene she's almost steering a one-woman ship of retro wave

>>73270286
>couldnt even name a certain artist
huh

>>73270286
Let me guess anon. You are deaf, aren't you?

>>73270231
dumb comeback

>>73270308
>>73270309
Ok
talking heads
Devo
Donna summer
Anybody to ever be a woman and sing over synths

>>73270028
dumb opinion

>>73270382
you haven't even listened to grimes, amirite?
how any of them sound similar to any of the following songs?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1zmCtmQ6W4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_hFrJ-FM2o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvXkx3IcOi4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUe9rnucPoU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R00Vu7Ag7s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2_hBNQqEus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTvanzhR6ok
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVt3FxE8F9w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOwhuTlxE54

>>73270540
All of them
Guess I'll throw in Brian Eno and David Bowie's ambient tracks as well because a lot of those reminded me of Low and albums like that
Look I like grimes I have halfaxa and visions on vinyl but she's not really doing anything that hasn't been done yet

>>73270612
any particular album that sounds like halfaxa or art angels?

>>73270160

Oh boy now u gone done dun it

>>73270160
prepare for the flood m8

>>73270612
>All of them
how?

>she's not really doing anything that hasn't been done yet
see >>73270622

>>73270622
Art angels is pretty heavily based in other music even AnCo/Panda Bear has a sound that sounds like Grimes
Halfaxa is harder to pin down but ethereal sounding pop isn't all that uncommon
I haven't bothered to listen to any other album like that just because I haven't bothered to look into the genre
Aphex Twin for sure had a grimes sound
Look I think you're mistaking talent for originality
She's like...prog pop if you will
Nothing new but what she does she does really well and a lot better than the rest

>>73270773
Bjork. How did I forget bjork

>>73270160
>how does the music board have such shit taste in music
please don't mistake the entire music board for the three or four mentally ill virgins who spam her here

>>73270160
I must reply to you because I'm a leddit fan boy who can't take any criticism and must not autistcally reply to everybody who says something negative about my artist.

>>73270773
>still not naming any particular album
ok

judging by the logic of your post you might be one of those people who claim that nothing is original, but only particularly in particular cituations

>>73270286
>Try any 80's electro pop or new wave
i'm an expert in that. there is no similar music to her music. pick any artist you want: ymo, depeche mode, omd, eurythmics, propaganda, telex, tears for fears, duran duran, a flock of seagulls, devo, talking heads, elvis costello, visage, japan, sparks, art of noise, yazoo, pet shop boys, erasure, etc.

show me one song of them that sounds like:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oqxz6hpGbs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04etL7ILb38
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2EJMd7ZN7w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rVIx3VbJTM

let's see what you got.

don't respond to this anon.
>>73270252
>>73270308
>>73270309
>>73270540

even if you provide similar music you're not going to win the argument because he's an idiot who has been rendered completely irrational through his bias

>>73270612
>All of them
absolutely bullshit answer. you're not even trying.

>Anybody to ever be a woman and sing over synths
that proves how shallow you are. according to your dumb logic jesus and mary chain and the beatles are the same because it's just some male singing over guitars.

>>73270905
you also posted this crap yesterday. stop being a moron. you have no arguments, just admit defeat.

>even if you provide similar music
WHERE?

File: 41.png (7KB, 349x160px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 349x160px

>>73270905
>not providing similar music
>complaining about bias

File: IMG_4254.jpg (229KB, 750x965px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 750x965px

>>73270872
Are you going to argue with Grimes herself?

>>73270928
Yeah mate we call that rock music

>>73270958
that dumb anon: btfo to pieces!

>>73270872
>there is no similar music to her music.
similarity is a subjective term. you're obviously looking for something that is exactly the same as the songs you've posted which is absolutely ridiculous. don't you see what you're doing anon? this isn't an argument. this is you setting everyone up to fail with hilariously unrealistic expectations.

if you weren't such a rhetorical moron you would realize that there are tons of similarities between the music that anon provided and grimes' music

>>73270969
no. influences =/= similar music. don't play dumb.

>>73270989
are you a clone of that other anon?

>>73270958
>expecting him to post similar music in a post dedicated to talking about why posting similar music is a waste of time

>>73270953
>>73270958
see
>>73271008

who else /droppedafterartangels/ here?

File: tumblr_inline_mm3bqpMsEV1qz4rgp-300x300.jpg (11KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x300px

>>73270983
>missing the point
it wasn't about the genre. it was about 2 specific artist being considered to sound the same just because both used male voices and guitars.

>>73271029
'sup man!

god that album was shit

>>73271008
stop playing dumb, ffs. you're ridiculous. nobody asked for identical sounding music but for similar music. identical =/= similar!

you >>73270382 pretended that:
>talking heads
>Devo
>Donna summer
are similar to grimes. are you fucking stupid? did you even listen to her music?

you just saw her genre (synthpop) and immediately assumed she's like all synthpop artists. wrong!

>>73271100

dont bother anon, retards gonna retard when Grimes is 2deep4them

>>73271100
Why are you getting so worked up it's just music
So I hear new wave in her music I'm just here for a conversation that I WAS having a good time with before you headasses showed up and started accusing me of something

>>73270872
Newsflash: You aren't the ultimate authority on what is and isn't similar to grimes' music. The fact that you think you are just shows how much of an egocentric prick you are. I can say that I think her music is similar to the sound of shit dropping into a toilet and you couldn't prove me wrong because there is no right and wrong in this situation. You don't get to say "I'm an expert and I have officially decided that nothing is similar to Grimes." How socially handicapped are you? Do you actually have autism?

>>73271118
it's not about 2deep4them, it's about a minimal research before posting itt. these idiots talk about things they don't know about (her music). when they're asked to provide evidence, they're posting crap like >>73270905 or >>73270382.

>Anybody to ever be a woman and sing over synths

why they even bother?

>>73271100
see
>>73271196

stop talking about you're biased subjective opinion like it's the ultimate truth. you are the most narcissistic person i've ever had the displeasure of interacting with. fuck off

>>73271196
>because there is no right and wrong in this situation.
it is, you idiot. your similar artists' list is totally off the mark. use your common sense, prick: if it doesn't sound like her music, why do you insist it does? are you deaf or dumb?

>>73271255
>>73271272

and fuck off.

>>73271272
>b-but my subjective opinion is objectively right
read a book anon. stop shitposting about your waifu 24/7 and do something about your obviously stunted intellect.

>>73271196
irony

>>73271330
>moving the goalposts
also, look who's talking: you're an imbecile that shitposts in a thead related to an artist you don't even like. go outside, get a job, meet a girl, just stop your lame shitposting. thanks, autist.

>>73270905
>>73271008
>>73271196
THIS. End of discussion.

>>73271330
do people really think about her that often and literally live in these threads? cool

>>73270612
>she's not really doing anything that hasn't been done yet
Who else has done her kind of music? Post artists.

>>73271409
>attempting to stop the discussion
>>>/trash/

>>73270811
Bjork, similar to Grimes? How?

>>73271396
>moving the goalposts
nobody is moving goalposts anon. let me break down your argument for you so you can realize how ridiculous you sound and you can finally stop saying this inane shit in every thread.

>some anon says they think her music is derivative
>you tell them that their opinion is objectively wrong because your opinion somehow supersedes theirs.
>you tell them to post music that sounds similar despite the fact that you've already internally decided that nothing sounds similar to her music (you even admitted so here >>73270872)
>it doesn't matter what music they post because you aren't actually interested in hearing the music that they think is similar. the only reason why you ask them to do so is so you can tell them that they're wrong.
>they post music that they think sounds similar
>you tell them that their opinion is wrong because again, your opinion is somehow more right than theirs
>you end up thinking that you've somehow won some argument when in reality all you've done is say "your opinion is wrong and my opinion is right"
>repeat process ad infinitum

now do you understand why i'm telling people to not respond to you? you're not actually trying to have an argument. you're just looking to tell them that their opinion is wrong which is such a waste of time and effort

>>73271618
>posts a huge wall of text
>expecting me to read it all
bad luck for you: i'm too old for this shit. go waste your time somewhere else, buddy.

>>73271618
/thread

>>73271716
>grimes stan is either so stupid he can't read 8 lines of text or so buttlbasted that he refuses to acknowledge it
nice

>>73271716
>clearly loses argument
>i'm not going to read all of that
well that's the most definitive admission of defeat i've ever gotten from a grimesfag

>>73271783
>grimesfag
>expecting to be taken seriouslty

>definitive admission of defeat
(you)

>>73271618
gg

File: 1772_zoom.png (960KB, 940x651px) Image search: [Google]

960KB, 940x651px

>>73271783
also
>implying that writing a wall of text = you won
here's your prize

>>73271716
>>73271802
>>73271846
i can't believe how immature you are. this is giving me second hand embarrassment. can't you just admit that you were in the wrong here? it's glaringly obvious but you still refuse to accept it. if you aren't going to act like the adult that you're required to be in order to post here, you could at least stop posting.

>>73271846
>>73271716
>Your argument is too long so therefore you're wrong even though i didn't read it
Just stop anon.

>>73271802
>getting this buttblasted over an admitted meme term

File: IMG_4255.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

What's with all the shit over "oh grimes is original" "grimes is unoriginal" like it actually matters whether or not she's innovative or whatever
She has great music and technique at what she does and that's more important than being original any day of the week

>>73271956
>an admitted meme term
it's not admitted and you suck.

>>73271900
keep bullshitting, anon. you still didn't provide a legit similar artists/songs list so far. my posting style/methods don't matter in this equation: you didn't win the argument. no legit similar artists/songs list, no win. get it?

File: 1336421982.jpg (113KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1280x720px

>>73271618

>>73272209
>keep bullshitting, anon. you still didn't provide a legit similar artists/songs list so far. my posting style/methods don't matter in this equation: you didn't win the argument. no legit similar artists/songs list, no win. get it?
i'm not going to respond to you anymore until you read my last post and acknowledge what i said. because what you've just said shows a blatant disregard for everything i've been saying for this entire thread. ignorance isn't going to get you anywhere here. either man the fuck up and come up with a real response to what i said, or stop talking.

File: 1460215113266.png (597KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 900x900px

>>73272209
>you still didn't provide a legit similar artists/songs list so far.
Holy shit he's still trying to push this non-argument. How dense can this anon be?

>>73272209
>it's not admitted
I (and numerous others in grimes threads) have said that it's just an extension of a 4chan meme that revolves around adding "-fag" to the end of words that describe someone (see: newfag, oldfag)
>and you suck
damn....

>>73272329
>>73272420
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgSPaXgAdzE

>>73272490
>People who routinely put "-fag" on the ends of their words aren't old enough to be posting here - it's an 18+ site.
bitch, be humble.

>>73272547
who are you quoting?
>>73272512
>resorting to ad hominem
nice

>>73272547
>not old enough to be here
says the child who would rather wail and gnash his teeth than admit he lost an argument

File: 1365751.png (177KB, 600x336px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 600x336px

>>73272688
(You)