Is this accurate?

Are you Norwegian or something

>>73227495

are you being serious? Aside from Jazz, you're missing a lot. And with Jazz, you missed Post-Bop and what is being coined 'Post-Jazz' (Check out Polar Bear, A Comet Is Coming & Sons of Kemet)

here's a fairly good interactive list to start with:

http://www.musicmap.info/

>>73227495
Perhaps add more than just... Dubstep
Electronic music has so much better to offer. Just look at downtempo stuff like Tycho, good lofi like HOME...

why is there an entry for just 'rock' and why does it come chronologically after folk rock and art rock? also if you're gonna go into a dozen subgenres for jazz have the decency to expand on just 'punk', 'rock', hip hop', and 'electronica' (especially electronic music, you're pretty much missing like all of it)

>>73227495
>disco in the 80s
Mid 70s buddy.

are the columns suppose to represent anything?

>>73228468
You say that like any of those genres are equivalent.

>>73227495
Scrap the entire chart and focus on 'classical'.

>>73228527
dumb classicalposter, you don't have to say any two genres are equivalent in any way to recognise that both their labels cover a wide range of styles

>>73227843
yeah

>>73228033
That's why I asked, thanks :)

>>73228282
Yeah I should've written that I'm a bassplayer and want to focus on the genres to gigs I'm actually going to get hired for doing. Sorry

>>73228468
You're right, my main focus have been on jazz when I wrote it, feel free to add to punk, rock and hip hop :)

>>73228486
Will correct this!

>>73228490
I didn't think much of it, I think I just subconsciously added a new column where I felt there was a drastic new branch evolving