>song is a sequel to a previous song and it's not prog rock

Pretty sure Metallica has a trilogy of "Unforgiven" songs. All on different albums.

File: d.png (655KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 1280x720px

>song sequels

The song After Dark by Blue Öyster Cult is a sequel to the song I Love The Night. About falling in love with a vampire.

File: 1496282820991.png (670KB, 550x792px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 550x792px

>song has a part 3
>band releases part 2.5

File: 1496114669305.jpg (73KB, 639x633px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 639x633px

>>73225699
>two part song with one following the other, with a total run time of less than 8 minutes

>(Reprise)
>it's longer than the original track

File: 1473650925695.jpg (78KB, 460x460px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 460x460px

>song is a bonus track on the European release and it's put at the front of the album and has samples in it that lead into the samples on the original first track

>>73225699
You have no idea how common that used to be, especially in country music in the 40's and 50's. Artists would create sequels songs titled " Answer to [Song Title]". It was also rampant in R&B, with artists recucling the same character in four or five tracks.

File: 1492052760687.jpg (188KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 400x600px

>song has three parts
>first track is part one
>second is parts two through three
>together they are only five minutes long

>write song about guy in 60s
>write sequel in 1980
>German guy writes another sequel in 1982