Reviews that made you respect Pitchfork

what's pitchfork?

>>73224486
you first OP

File: chrome_2017-06-07_11-14-22.png (157KB, 1196x369px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1196x369px

>>73224486
and yeezus

File: 1457381388634.jpg (104KB, 992x994px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 992x994px

>>73224486

File: ITAOTS.png (178KB, 1245x287px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1245x287px

>>73224486

>>73224486
I'd respect Pitchfork for that if they gave some kind of intelligent justification

They're just jerking themselves off for saying something that would ruffle feathers. Which really defeats the purpose of trying to break new ground

Yeezus is the most overrated album of all time.

>>73227801
Why does it feel like their reviews are mostly contextual? Like they tell stories and just say random shit instead of talking about the music?

>>73224486

I used to like P4K until I saw their writers and it was all weird middle aged white guys who look like they enjoy cuck porn.

Does anyone have that racist review of that reviewer pretended to be a black guy from the 60s? I think pitchfork removed it due to heavy backlash

>>73227856
they do go into some bullshit but music is largely contextual right?