>Look at me guys, I'm very smart! -Le intellectual music guy

Well he's smarter than you

>>73213893
Doubtful.

>>73213879
Does he know what a paradox is?

>>73213906
Nothing reeks of intelligence more than complaining about meme intellectuals on /mu/

>>73213879
it actually makes sense
lots of things are innovative
but nobody cares (accepts) until a bunch of hacks exploit (imitate) the innovation

>>73213959
yeah but it's also high school tier philosophy

>"hey guys, the world is like unfair"

>>73213879
What's wrong with this exactly
>>73214130
So
A lot of quotable things are pretty fucking obvious they only become quotable because they're said eloquently

>>73214130
Wait what? The point isn't that it's unfair.

>>73213941
Thats what he's trying to imply stupid.

>>73214130
Are you retarded?

>>73214387
>defending scaruffi

>>73214411
Scaruffi has done more in his life than you could do with ten.
This thread is a failure on several levels.

File: 1492232237251_1.png (126KB, 800x769px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 800x769px

>>73213879
what did he mean by this?

>>73213906
How many books have you written on Art, Hiking and AI?

>>73214411
>Attacking scaruffi by being an idiot
You sure showed him

>>73214491
>writing pretentious topic equals intelligence

>>73214577

art, hiking and AI are "pretentious"? are you kidding me?

poptimism and anti-intellectualism are destroying society.

>>73213879

he is right.

>>73214491
>self-published

>>73214721

so? again, how many books have you written, faggot?

>>73214765
If its that easy to publish books, I will probably write one now and maybe sent it out for free.

>>73213879
This just means the truly innovative people aren't appreciated but later copycats are?

File: product_thumbnail.php.jpg (19KB, 224x320px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 224x320px

>>73214765
pic related, faggot. You can order a physical copy right now

>>73214854
The innovation itself is not appreciated until copycats arise and legitimize it

>>73214921
>Taking credit for the effort of many people

>>73214965
Oh? And how many books have you published, faggot?

File: product_thumbnail.php(2).jpg (27KB, 224x320px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 224x320px

>>73215014
Just one

>10/11/2011 17:11 - piero .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·..·´¯`·. scaruffi wrote:
>What you are saying is
>1. We created something called Wikipedia and established some rules
>2. We expect every person to learn and comply with these rules
>3. Otherwise we take no responsibility for what happens to you

>Scary, isn't it?
>It's like me inventing a new game and forcing you to participate even though
>you never asked to. And if you don't, we'll have your car vandalized and we'll
>take no responsibility for your car being vandalized.

>It's a bigger version of the spammers who automatically add you to their
>mailing lists and then tell you "if you want to unsubscribe, go to this
>website [hoping that it works] and click on 22 lines". I suspect you are
>not too happy when this happens to you.

>You would react very differently if Wikipedia were charged $1 for every time
>that YOU post something that is not true
>(please do not reply "we didn't post it - the people of the world posted it":
>your website, your responsibility).

>Maybe i should create an anti-Wikipedia guerrilla movement that will unleash
>thousands of freedom fighters worldwide each vandalizing hundreds of Wikipedia
>pages every day. That works, right? I think it complies with your own rules.
Why didn't his anti-Wikipedia guerrilla movement take off, /mu/?

>>73214685
The topics itself are not pretentious. It's the way he writes about them that is.

>>73213879
It really says something that the only insult you can come up with is
>Le smart man XD

Bill Gates?
>look at me guys I hab so many moniesXDXD!1!1!1

>>73216907
Will Bill ever recover from this?

Why don't scaruffifags just stop defending him if you just get so pissed off?
Seriously, its not like he physically needs you to defend him on /mu/ to give him life.

>>73213879
http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/gays.html
LOL

>>73216950
Why don't anti-scaruffifags just stop attacking him if they get so pissed off?
Seriously, its not like he physically needs you to attack him on /mu/ to give him death

File: lusty_negro_attitudes.png (131KB, 293x308px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 293x308px

>Philosophy is the art of saying something incredibly stupid and making it sound incredibly intelligent.

>>73216976
because neo-/mu/ is filled with p4k clones that hate the fact that Scaruffi has a decent opinion
I'm indifferent towards the guy, but seriously just leave these shitty posts alone, you're not physically inclined to reply to these kids.

reminder that scaruffi doesn't even like rock music

File: Capture.png (42KB, 205x660px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 205x660px

>>73217016

>>73217006
I actually like reading Scruffy from time to time, I've just spent years forcing the pedo meme because I wanted to have a serious discussion about the Beatles

>>73214491
How many books has he written on Thermodynamics, Parabolic Sequence, and Macular Degeneration? Oh shit, zero.

What a smart individual.

>>73215014
I posted "Doubtful." I've published 4 books, and 3 others as a collaborating author.

>>73217146
>Certain knowledge is more valuable than another

Kys

>>73217171
b-b-but you're posting bad things about Scaruffi on 4chan, you're supposed to be a neet anon...

>>73217146
It is better to be miles above everyone else on earth in a subject like rock music than to be a mediocre thermodynamics writer.

>>73214921
>>73215014
That's no your book, nor have you published it. It was written by /lit/, you took no part in it.

File: shit.jpg (8KB, 218x218px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 218x218px

>>73214785
>>73214921
>>73217171
>tfw "how many books" isn't a valid Scaruffi-defense-option anymore
What now lads

>>73213879
>>73213959
>>73214154
I mean he's not wrong, but that's such an obvious and pseudo-intellectual statement to make. Of course innovation gets copied.

>>73217146
If you support the mindless marching on off science towards our inevitable mass suicide than you're retarded.

File: scaruffucker.png (35KB, 905x394px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 905x394px

>>73213879
>reminder that this person unironically believes that Fred Durst is a better vocalist than Ian Gillan, Ozzy Osbourne, Elvis, John Lennon, and Paul McCartney

>>73217571
maybe not michael jackson but what have the others even done?

>>73217571
Not wrong

>>73217464
>calling others pseuds
>completely misses the point

>>73217571
It's as if he slipped in one retarded ass hot take just to see if anyone would notice

>>73217681
>this person unironically believes that fred durst had a bigger influence on the world of music than elvis, morrissey, ozzy osbourne, lennon, and mccartney

>>73217571
Do Scaruffi fans enjoy Limp Bizkit?
Or do they just pretend to so they please their messiah

>>73217571
I like how you don't show that these don't have a numerical order

File: scuf slipknot.png (15KB, 331x105px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 331x105px

Now I understand why Scaruffi likes 14 year olds
Its because he himself is also a 14 year old

>>73216961
This actually just made me loose faith in scaruffi

>>73217571
he's perfect for his band. he's got tons of charisma despite being kind of embarrassing, that's pretty unique i'd say. obviously this isn't about actual technical singing capabilities now is it?

>>73213959
What Scaruffi says in this quotation is false, though; an innovation does not ever become an imitation. There must have been a extended lapse of reason when he made this claim. He might have meant to say, "when it has been imitated," however, if such were the case, there would be no paradox.

>>73218488
t. Scaruffi hater