>A chromatic mediant relationship is a relationship between two sections and/or chords whose roots are related by a major third or minor third, contain one common tone, or share the same quality, i.e. major or minor.
This makes no fucking sense. Surely that would mean I and V have a chromatic mediant relationship, since they share a common tone and are both major.
Is there a missing "and" somewhere? Am I just retarded? Explain this shit /mu/
>whose roots are related by a major third or minor third
bad bait
>>73201590
???
The key word here is mediant. Mediants are III chords specifically (III, iii, bIII....), and a chromatic mediant is a case in which two chords (That are a major or minor 3rd apart) contain:
One common tone
One chromatically altered tone
An example being C major and Eb Major
C = C E G
Eb = Eb G Bb
Both chords contain G, and Eb is a chromatic alteration of E. Thus, C major and Eb major are chromatic mediants.
There's also doubly chromatic mediants, where there are two chromatically altered tones and no common tones, such as C major and Eb minor.
>music theory
>>73202946
This. Creep uses a chromatic mediant so that the entire song has a three chromatic note part throughout. It's an I - III - IV - iv progression in G. So the D of the I becomes the Eb of the III which becomes the E of the IV which becomes the Eb of the iv. It the cycles for the entire song. Things like this allow you to use a non diatonic chord progression without it sounding jarring to normie ears.