Thoughts?

Really good.

It's a bad album. I don't know why people like it so much

>>73194717
this. It's literally H&M-core and I like some Paramore songs. I don't understand how this is regarded as good let alone their best.

I'm surprised Shalley Williams hasn't blown her fucking brains out

Their best album. It's really good, no real filler either. Weak closing track though. But, that's my only gripe with it. I hope Paramore continues to make albums, especially of this kind.

>>73194698

It's a good album, but it's obvious Paramore (Hayley, really) made this safe 80s pop revival album because they want radioplay. Guitar music is dead now, and yet another rock band but the dust.

7/10 from me

>>73195054
>Not knowing York is the real leader of Paramore
>Thinking a band should just make the same album over and over again or they're sell outs
okay

it's ok. few great songs, rest is trash

I like the change from their typical whiny teen girl angst because all the cute boys like me but I want this cute boy but he has a gf I feel so alone rn ugh :-( to something a little more mature.

I expected crashing and burning like Humanz
Get off pleasantly surprised

thought it was mostly a pleasant listen but dont particularly feel like revisiting it

Hard Times is such a choon though

>>73195102

When did I say they were sellouts? Most popular rock bands these days make dancy pop music. Paramore were always a pop group from the start, so they literally can't be sellouts.

>York

Literally who. Hayley is the only member people care about

>>73195300
wat

Am I a rockist/elitist if I refuse to bother listening to Paramore, Carly Rae Jepson, or Taylor Swift when I could be listening to something, basically anything else?
I listen to tons of new shit in basically any genre but are these artists really worth the time that could be spent listening to something more unique and more exciting?
All I think of when I see the name Paramore is that song "That's When You Get" and I say "nope."