Is this punk?

>>73189666

college rock, like r.e.m. but listenable

i don't think so. maybe? sounds like alt rock to me

>>73189684
>implying R.E.M aren't GOAT tier
come on now

Proto-Bandcamp-core

aka the worst thing to ever fucking exist

>>73189715
So how should i tag it in my library? I'm considering tagging all the bad music i like as "shit" but i'm not sure.

>>73189705
i listened to r.e.m's first two albums,
(supposedly near their best) and they were both thoroughly not good. it was like the smiths but without any good melodies or songs. not the guy you are responding to, but

>>73189746
but its not bad. tag it as alternative and be done with it

File: untitled.jpg (81KB, 1071x715px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1071x715px

>>73189705

>>73189768
If you want better melodies listen to Automatic for the People.

>>73189666

>Gets SATANIC DUBS

It's punk in attitude but not so much in music.

>>73189684
I'd compare it more to early Minutemen than R.E.M. if D. Boon played an acoustic guitar and Mike Watt played a stand up bass.