>2017 >still listening to VU and not RT

Literally who?

>>73175841
Royal Trux.

Unfortunately, /mu/ is super pleb where it comes to Jon Spencer side projects. Especially such a good one. Oh well, more for me

>>73175999
The only good thing about this post was the digits

>>73175677
YES! MAKE MUSIC GREAT AGAIN

>>73175677
why not listen to both

File: 54cf885916cc4_-_esq-reed-xlg-23164594.jpg (52KB, 614x354px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 614x354px

Literally dude weed lmao music

Scaruffi tricked all rym faggots into liking them

File: Royal_Trux_-_Radio_Video_EP.jpg (53KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x500px

>>73179243
i got into them because they used this song in High Fidelity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1othc05a5Cs

scene from the movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQRNFgO-ho0

>>73179572
Wondering how much they paid RT since that movie made $47 mil

>>73176042
Not knowing who the band is? Ok then

Twin Infinitives is the only good thing they've ever done

>>73179065
the retirement and replacement of 20thC. icons is a minor obsession of mine.

>>73182109
fair

but royal trux are pretty old themselves now, who replaces them?

>>73182131
Well the VU myth of "and most influential but no-one heard of za za za why we started a band za za za burger burger" was quite late in their lives. Royal Trux are sort of perfect for it. . . and it is kinda true-ish.

Who replaces them [if it even works as a meme] is an "I'll be dead by then" type question. Whoever it is is probably still waiting to drop out of art college as we type.