what beatle was most handsome beatle?

Traditionally George
For me it's Paul

>>73128224
Paul>George=John>>>>>>>>>>Ringo

>>73128437
Is Ringo not the worst at anything?

Its John after he got shot

>>73128461
he wasn't the worst Thomas the Tank Engine narrator

>>73128744
I bet he was

>>73128461
least worst actor out of the beatles?

>>73128461
he's the only one competent at his instrument

Paul by 60's standards, John by 70's Standards, George by current standards.

Ringo by paleolithic standards.

>>73129344
Stop parroting this bullshit from the Scarruffi pasta.

George was better at lead guitar and Paul better at bass than Ringo was at drums. I mean compositionally Paul is a phenomenal bass player.

>>73128224
They're were all objectively ugly.

the question is who gives a shit, beatles suck

LONG LIVE G R I M E S

They're all ugly you dumb heterosexuals.

>>73129539
>Paul McCartney
>ugly

>>73128224
John>george>paul>ringo

>>73128461
he'll probably live the longest
guess he'll have the last laugh

>>73129539
>objectively ugly

Not understanding attraction is inherently subjective.

>>73129501
Nup, in terms of importance in the industry as well as general talent, neither of them matched Ringo.

>>73128224
Every girl goes through the same series as this:
First they start with Paul, because he has boyish, clean cut good looks that appeal to teenagers
Then they move on to John and his bad boy, edgy ways as they get older
Then they move onto George because they appreciate his quiet, dark demeanor
Then they settle for Ringo

They're all ugly, but Paul is a pretty decent-looking guy.

>>73128736
Savage.

The real answer is Yoko Ono.

File: 1476130815016.png (269KB, 450x325px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 450x325px

>>73130114
>attraction is inherently subjective.
Oh boy, it's this meme again

>>73128224
They all look the same

>>73129603
This!

File: ss.jpg (340KB, 820x1326px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 820x1326px

>>73128224
Stuart Sutcliffe

Billy

>tfw I look more like Ringo, out of all the Beatles

End it