>>73126726
who?
>ITT: Bands who reached there peak early in their careers and got progressively worse as they tried to expand on their sound
60s pop Who > Everything else they ever did
LOL yup pretty much
The only one I've heard from them was Tommy and I didn't really like it.
Well anyways its not for everyone its more for people who like 70's rock
>>73126757
their best songs are on Sell Out
>>73126806
That's what I've heard, rock operas aren't my thing anyway so I don't know why I thought starting with Tommy was a good idea.
i agree with you in a way for me their most popular most well written songs are on sellout for me personally i think their best album is live at leeds, if your a fan check out the isle of wight concert i think its pretty good
if anybody wants to try looking into the who i highly recommend live at leeds and who's next
>>73126757
Listen to My Generation and Sell Out. A Quick One is optional imo because I find most of it forgettable filler aside from the title track.
The Who Gives A Fuck
people who like 70's rock
>>73126726
Literally the who?
Who's Next is literally kino dad rock
ya at its old at least its well written music
>>73126834
Seriously, listen to Sell Out. I don't like their other stuff but Sell Out has some fantastic songs. Tattoo is my favorite by them.
Their only good live desu, their studio albums can go fuck themselves. Also Tommy and Quadrophenia isn't that good
>>73126726
They're good live but shite at everything else
>>73126755
Good post.