> (feat. ) > Feat. Which is the patrician taste?

It should be

>and

or

>with

File: Fedora+wars+3+tipping+and+dipping_dc593f_4999640.jpg (178KB, 780x1170px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 780x1170px

>>73115648

taking that out of the track title and putting it in the performer tag instead

>>73115666
demonic trips has spoken

please kill me

neither.

(ft. ) is the correct answer

if you use Feat. I am coming to kill you

File: soilwork_bjorn_speed_strid_by_er69ck-d946bdg.jpg (238KB, 900x1265px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 900x1265px

>>73115636
Bjorn "Speed" Strid

>>73115697
this

neither, just remember who is on the track moron

>>73115636
Why do niggers do this? Rock musicians don't do this. You don't see tracks called "I Zimbra feat. Robert Fripp" or "In the Kingdom #19 feat. Mike Watt".

>>73115683
DO NOT harm yourself anon I was only being sassy, I like it when songs use "with"

(feat. ) is always correct, Feat. is autism-tier

Not doing

>Artist 1 Featuring Artist 2 - Song Title

This is the correct way to do it.

>>73115668
there we fucking go

>>73116556
separate performers. Artist 1, Artist 2 - Song Title

Otherwise when you sort by artist you get one-off song results.

>not using Contributing artists tag
stay pleb tier