What Beatle was/is the biggest hack?

>>73094869
Paul by definition

idunno but Ringo is last on the list

Which beatle do you think had the biggest peeny?

>>73094869
John was such a hack one could be fooled into thinking he was intentionally marketed by their label as the "hack"

John obviously

A hack is someone who doesn't innovate, who produces run-of-the-mill schlock that doesn't challenge or surprise--an artist with no courage, in other words.

John: wrote crazy shit, did crazy shit, lived to piss people off, so not him.

Paul: dressed the whole band up in neon 19th-century band uniforms and brought the oboe to rock and roll. There's a difference between being a silly dork and being an artistic coward. Not him.

George: is responsible for the weird-ass sitar track on every good Beatles album, so not him.

Ringo: not an interesting answer, but probably him. He's the closest thing the Beatles had to a normal musician. But honestly, there's not really a hack in the Beatles.

You know who was a bigger hack than John, Paul, George, or Ringo? Every member of the Rolling Stones not named Bryan Jones. And Bryan Jones was still probably more of a hack than John, Paul, or George. He did everything the Beatles did only 5 months later.

Nah, they were an extremely influential band that skyrocketed the Rock genre and is responsible for most of Rock sub-genres today.

File: Schermata 2017-05-31 alle 18.52.42.png (325KB, 2000x964px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 2000x964px

>>73095205
this

>>73095078
this

George. Does 1 song per Beatles album then releases 1 good album of Beatles reject songs and then complrte shit afterwards yet he was never as big or John and Paul so that means he was the best right?

File: IMG_4222.jpg (139KB, 600x537px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 600x537px

>>73095549
But that wasn't the original cover
The original got censored

Unequivocally paul

>>73095654
I was racking my brain trying to figure out why it was censored then I saw the muff

File: Schermata 2017-05-31 alle 18.52.31.png (3MB, 1794x878px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1794x878px

>>73095654
fair enough

let's try this other one then

>>73095133
Ringo>Paul>George>John

>>73095205
But Ringo's drumming in A Day in the Life is inreplicable, Phil Collins said it himself.

>>73095631
Its not like Paul and John had such amazing discographies after the Beatles. All Thing Must Pass > Plastic Ono Band > All of Paul's post Beatles, John's and George
and on the Beatles George had Something, Here Comes The Sun, While My Guitar Gently Weeps, Blue Jay Ways, Within You Without You, all amazing songs imo
All of Paul's and John's song were from that good on all of their respective albums

Probably Paul. He intentionally tried to sabotage Let it Be out of spite.