List the times, when p4k went full retard.

File: wtf.jpg (42KB, 817x256px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 817x256px

How the fuck is Wild Honey a 3.5?

>>73062717
I miss when they were this edgy. It was fun, now they're just some NOISEY knockoff.

and for what its worth, I believe the guy who wrote the NYC Ghosts & Flowers review regrets it and has disowned it since.

>>73062717
>Belle & Seb review calls the band mediocre
>The album rating is insanely low
Pitchfork doesn't even know what elementary school vocabulary words mean

>>73062736
>nme 10
>p4k 0

wew, epic prank there

>>73062721
Isn't the rationale that the B Boys are too white for soul music or some shit? I don't know. Wild Honey is great though

Life of Pablo.

>>73062717
My brain can't understand how any of this could happen no matter how long I think about it.

>>73062780
what does even a 0.8 rating mean?

>>73062803
No integrity. Not that complicated.

>>73062812
It means Pitchfork has shit taste.

>>73062717
>Discovery 6.4
holy shit how retarded can you be? That album is at LEAST a 9.

>>73062717
the top 4 scores are all accurate though
pitchfork has been out of integrity since conde nast bought them, not since they started disagreeing with you

>>73062812
I think they get the scores from averaging every reviewer's own score. A 0.8 seems arbitrary but I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt and assuming there is some logic to the numbers.