[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

ITT: Bad pitchfork scores.

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 70
Thread images: 27

File: Capture.png (126KB, 484x347px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
126KB, 484x347px
.
>>
>hate p4k
>cry about p4k relentlessly
>keep going on p4k for more qq material and give them hits
>advertise p4k via your new qq material on /mu/
>never once post about the plethora of alternative online music publications out there
really gets the synapses firing
>>
File: wtf.jpg (42KB, 817x256px) Image search: [Google]
wtf.jpg
42KB, 817x256px
This triggers me
>>
>>73043764
there hasn't been a better album in the year+ since it was released. I'd say it's the ONLY 9/10 album in recent memory. Good try though, OP.
>>
I actually really like this album, but a perfect 10 is an insanely ridiculous score. Its an above average post hardcore album, probably a 7.5-8/10 at best
>>
>>73043800
No one's gonna fall for this anon
>>
File: Capture+_2017-05-28-14-06-58.png (1023KB, 1439x1844px) Image search: [Google]
Capture+_2017-05-28-14-06-58.png
1023KB, 1439x1844px
>>73043805
Forgot pic
>>
>>73043800
cough cough
>>
should be much higher
>>
File: RIP.png (158KB, 1211x390px) Image search: [Google]
RIP.png
158KB, 1211x390px
>>
>>73043844
LOL
>>
File: 1495565073559.jpg (18KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
1495565073559.jpg
18KB, 600x600px
>>73043805
>>
Disintegration loops 10
>>
File: Capture.png (240KB, 656x548px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
240KB, 656x548px
>>
>>73043844
>a fucking 2
How plebeian can you get?
>>
File: IMG_2978.jpg (58KB, 629x594px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2978.jpg
58KB, 629x594px
obligatory
>>
File: IMG_9206.jpg (60KB, 640x745px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_9206.jpg
60KB, 640x745px
>humanz got the same score as demon days
>>
>>73043842
I love Sun Kil Moon, but I havent had a chance to listen to this. Is it really that good?
>>
File: lmao.png (203KB, 1042x373px) Image search: [Google]
lmao.png
203KB, 1042x373px
kek'd desu
>>
File: Capture.png (143KB, 770x261px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
143KB, 770x261px
This might very well be the worst review of all time.
>>
File: IMG_2129.jpg (66KB, 640x601px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2129.jpg
66KB, 640x601px
I don't understand how this scored higher than Acid Rap
>>
>>73044059
that score almost ruined his life
>>
>>73043948
How is that bait? I admitted its a really good album, i just dont believe its a PERFECT 10 OUT OF 10.
>>
>>73044056
it's fantastic, AOTY
>>
>>73044056
its the definition of a grower, you will hate like 40% of it first listen, but the second listen, at least for me, it grew hard. Its extremely experimental yet has a solid amount of beautiful/folkier songs like God Bless Ohio, Butch Lullaby (some sections), Stranger Than Paradise, Early June Blues, and I Love Portugal. It has amazing, sometimes funky drums too and for 2 hours it feels insanely short. Its a massive improvement over Universal Themes and blows J/SKM out of the water
>>
>>73044162
how did you get Source Tags & Codes from The Life of Pablo cover art?
>>
>>73044335
See
>>73043829
Jesus christ you retarded brain dead faggot. Fucking hang yourself already.
>>
>>73043844
what the fuck

why do people take p4k serious again?
>>
>>73044372
chill son, it's my bad
>>
>>73043979
this one is painfully accurate
>>
>>73043979
That's actually pretty accurate. Good on you, p4k.
>>
File: Cmon Son.jpg (48KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
Cmon Son.jpg
48KB, 1280x720px
>>73043830
>>
>>73044433
>>73044441
fuck off samefag
>>
>>73044403
How could you not figure out that i just forgot the pic? I hope youre drunk because otherwise you might have some serious issues
>>
>>73044489
17:47:47
17:48:09
>>
File: kys.png (6KB, 370x106px) Image search: [Google]
kys.png
6KB, 370x106px
>>73044489
>waaah everyone who disagrees with me is a samefag
fuck off retard
>>
File: file.png (156KB, 986x375px) Image search: [Google]
file.png
156KB, 986x375px
>>
>>73043979
But that's right
>>73044110
Every critic and their mother dickrode Coloring Book, despite it dropping off the face of the earth like 2 weeks later
>>
>>73044527
I hate pitchfork
>>
>>73044143
How?
>>
>>73044110
it's much beter than Acid Rap though
>>
>>73044729
>8.7
Still a shit rating
>>
bumpo
>>
File: 20170528_183243.png (471KB, 1080x1481px) Image search: [Google]
20170528_183243.png
471KB, 1080x1481px
>>
>>73044527
>>73044729
album is a 5/10 btw
>>
File: 9_75Hk84A60.jpg (45KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]
9_75Hk84A60.jpg
45KB, 540x540px
>>
>>73043800
i think he posted it cause the rating was too low
>>
>>73045356
literally nothing wrong with these ratings
>>
>The awkwardly chipper music in “Bastille Day” creates an effect not dissimilar to Smash Mouth playing the intro to “All Star” on loop while their singer threatens the audience.

holy kek
>>
>>73045483
uhh, Emotion is rated way too low. Should be high 8 at least
>>
>>73043764

Drukqs, 5.5.

Bonnie Prince Billy, I see a Darkness, 10.0.

Albums that I have bought /because/ they earned a perfect 10.0 on Pitchfork include the above, Loveless, Sketches of Spain, and one or two others. I never listen to the above Bonnie Prince Billy album anymore.

I seem to remember that they've given some really shitty, unwarranted scores to Basement Jaxx and/or Squarepusher on certain releases.

To the site's credit, I also remember a time when they re-reviewed/revised their estimation of Music Has The Right To Children, up from 8.3 or such, to a correct perfect 10.0. This is the one album that apotheosized BoC's sound and spawned so many contemporary imitators, including BMSR, to a point.
>>
File: ;lkjasdf.png (126KB, 1225x399px) Image search: [Google]
;lkjasdf.png
126KB, 1225x399px
>>
>>73045575
you should know that there's a difference between bad scores and scores you disagree with
>>
File: Ode to the Ghetto.jpg (115KB, 1208x559px) Image search: [Google]
Ode to the Ghetto.jpg
115KB, 1208x559px
At least 6
>>
File: Capture+_2017-05-28-16-34-49.png (205KB, 711x726px) Image search: [Google]
Capture+_2017-05-28-16-34-49.png
205KB, 711x726px
Should've been lower than St. Anger senpai
>>
>>73045608

This sophistry cuts one of two ways, and either way, you're wrong.

On the one hand, we honestly and soberly remember that musical taste and appreciation are totally subjective, in which case your differentiation between the two categories vanishes as meaningless and the OP's question is totally spurious. Yet here you are giving what sounds like your own opinion, or something like it, which leads to the alternative.

On the other hand, we reject the above view and assert that it is possible to meaningfully rank the quality of various musical albums in some way, maybe a weighted blend of personal appreciation, sales, critical acclaim, cultural importance etc. And no matter what way you care to slice it, since it's now possible to speak of other reviews as being "bad/bogus" (the rhetorical intent of the OP), it becomes clear that Drukqs was underrated by pitchfork, while the BPB album was hugely overrated. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world:

1) I personally like Drukqs much better than the BPB album (this is of course the most important weight-item; there will never be a more important one, but it's not the only one)
2) I am better than you (having better taste, a better life and so on)
3) So by 1) and 2) my opinion of DrukQs versus the other album is more important than the aggregate critical scores which peg the other album overall higher per wiki, much less your personal opinion, and finally as a supporting argument
4) General Cultural Importance. DrukQs is culturally a more important album than the other. Anyone can make sad bastard singer-songwriter stuff and have the critics jagoff to it if he does it just right. Although hindsight is 20/20, DrukQs remains a rather novel album whose meme has been repeated rather more loudly than the other.

See how easy that was?
>>
File: 562.png (627KB, 1597x1600px) Image search: [Google]
562.png
627KB, 1597x1600px
>>73046142
7/10 made me kek
>>
File: 2341.png (194KB, 1087x551px) Image search: [Google]
2341.png
194KB, 1087x551px
This was just crazy to me. They give all the other classics like Illmatic, 36 Chambers, Ready to Die, Liquid Swords, Infamous, 10/10, and yet they don't include Reasonable Doubt in that group? Reasonable Doubt is absolutely in that same tier of hip hop premium classics; in most rankings it's often ranked second to Illmatic as greatest of all time. It almost feels like they don't like Jay-Z's current persona as super rich man and thus he's not as "real" as the others, but I was blown away when they didn't give this a 10. Some of the best rapping ever on record
>>
>>73045591

I'm really surprised they haven't gone back and given it a 10 yet. Wouldn't be surprised if they do so soon on a "retro" review tho.
>>
>>73044110
agreed, colouring book was mediocre, havent listened to it more than once
acid rap will be remembered as one of the greatest albums of the 2010s though
>>
>>73044047
This
Literally only because Humanz features so many black artists. Demon Days is a far more well-crafted, nuanced, varied, and influential album than Humanz ever will be.
>>
>>
>>73043764
Actually it's pretty accurate
>>
File: 1371080362917.png (109KB, 317x317px) Image search: [Google]
1371080362917.png
109KB, 317x317px
>>73043805
>post hardcore
>>
File: 1495349127889.jpg (13KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]
1495349127889.jpg
13KB, 320x320px
>>73045325
>he doesn't get it
>>
>>73044034
true, should be lower
>>
>>73046332
>album has Aint No Nigga
>albumm is 10/10

pick only one
>>
>>73048400

but that song is dope
>>
>>73048299
>source codes and tags
>not post hardcore
How fucking stupid are you
>>
>>73043764
You're right it's more like a 9.3 and should have been AOTY
Thread posts: 70
Thread images: 27


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.