>Sgt. Peppers
>remix
????
I found some problems with your image. No need to thank me, just trying to help.
>>73033485
I poked out my eardrums years ago. Fuck music. The tips of my penis has become 1000x more sensitive
the remix is trash btw
>>73033485
anyone got a link to that 2017 mix
>>73033485
What's wrong with stereo unless you listen to it with headphones?
>>73033929
What's wrong with stereo if you listen to it with headphones?
>>73033695
Why would you intentionally use this meme wrong?
>>73033485
>Listening to the 2009 remaster
Of stereo or mono? They remastered both versions.
>>73038125
>use this meme wrong
lmao we got a meme expert here
>>73037456
when I'm walking or doing anything other than just sitting around I only wear one headphone
>>73039829
temporary secretary is a legitimately great song
>>73033603
It's actually a remix
>>73033695
Contrarians never learn
>>73033485
>listening to the Beatles
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.
>>73040806
im glad mega64 memed him into playing it live
>>73041014
wow good job! you posted the thing again!
>>73041247
Story behind this?