HOW DID HE DO IT /mu/?
Watch this video
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEG1Uga3o5Q
it's this fuckwits second live performance ever
not only is he sharing a stage with Andrew Jackson fucking Jihad (now known as AJJ) but the audience is singing along to his fucking songs, again, his second fucking performance, how did he get so prominent? I don't get it!
There are thousands of artists who have been working for years who don't even have half of the pull this fucker does, and he did it in the space of one album and two live shows
FUCK
Tell me /mu/
please, I want to achieve greatness like this
>>73025253
Crywank are good faggot, that's it, get good, and people will love you
>>73025730
no but that's so subjective, tonnes of great bands didn't have that kind of launch. It's bullshit
>>73025829
yes but by raw extension of logic, there are tonnes of great bands who never achieved what I'm presuming is luck.
These would be bands who have succeeded without such an embrasive start, so why care?
>>73025253
why do you care OP?
can't you be happy for an artist you enjoy?
Why does it matter how they are successfl when simply being so should be enough?
Is it because you are infact another artist? one drowning in his inadequacies compared to artists, like crywank, who you think are better than you? fufufu, OP is a salty faggot confirmed
>>73026504
I'm just curious is all fuck
>>73027047
AJJ must have liked his music, no great mystery to it.
>>73027285
no they were on tour, I don't think they had control of the bill
>>73027285
but I'm more curious about their prominence, how did so many people know of their music if they'd only released on album in the same year?
>"muh 6.000.000 gorillions of albums" argument
You woulg get the same answers on /pol/, if you understand what i mean
>>73027473
no, I can't say I do
>>73025730
>Crywank are good
>>73027665
not to your liking?