Now that the dust has settled, which anniversary release is better?

File: SLOOP JOHN B.jpg (14KB, 403x304px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 403x304px

>>73001671

File: 1475385914188.png (672KB, 1036x823px) Image search: [Google]

672KB, 1036x823px

>>73001663
>"People" actually think Sgt. Pepper is "good"
topkek

>>73001663
Sgt Pepper

>>73001663
I'm disappointed it doesn't have "Carnival of Light" released yet, but one step at a time I suppose.

>>73001792
Is it honestly worth listening to? I'm scared it's just going to be Paul and John jerking each other off

Pepper, clearly.

There's far too much overlap on the Pet Sounds 50th with previous reissues. If you already have The Pet Sounds Sessions, you have everything on the 50th anniversary except for the previously unreleased live material and the hardcover book.

With Pepper you get a brand new stereo and 5.1 mix of the entire album, a brand new transfer of the original mono mix (which you would normally have to buy either as a mono vinyl or in the Beatles in Mono CD collection), two discs of outtakes that have largely gone unbootlegged and a book.

pet sounds is still the better album but sgt. pepper's has a much much MUCH superior reissue. the new stereo mix imo increases the quality of the album immensely, now its much more neck and neck with pet sounds. songs like within you, without you are shit tier on the mono/old stereo mixes but now its like one of the best songs on the entire album

>>73001663
The Pet Sounds remaster was absolute dogshit, and I seldom ever say that about teamsters.

>>73001735
what does this even mean?
fuckhead.

Pet Sounds production wasn't dog shit so a remaster is kidna moot