/p4k/ - Nightly Pitchfork Countdown Hypetrain Thread

Damn girl that pasta needs an update

Shinichi Atobe review WHEN

Holy fuck Neil Breen is literally the worst director ever

File: p4kpepe.png (409KB, 1340x668px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 1340x668px

rare reminder:
beach house = aoty
+@ were robbed
i miss good content guy

>>72977115

I liked Fateful Findings

>>72977201
That was the one where a bunch of people killed themselves in front of the green screen at the end, right?

>>72977215

Oh yeah that's it alright haha

>>72977019
>-19 killed in explosion at Ariana Grande Concert
it wasn't an "explosion." p4k shill. it was a fucking terrorist attack. it was violent jihad committed by a radical islamist, the lowest of the low, a cowardly loser, a godless sodomite.

>>72977267
>the lowest of the low, a cowardly loser, a godless sodomite.
Don't bring Brandon into this

why can't p4k shill say the word "bomb" and "muslim" and "terrorism"?????

>>72977190
daily reminder gcg* is a khv**

*good content guy
**kissless hugless virgin

>>72977267
>>72977300
it was literally an explosion

is p4k gonna give any white men a bnm this year that's not for a meme reason like a dead wife or metal or computer bullshit?? just four ugly dudes (or one solo) who can't sing or play guitar, writing songs about not getting girls or anxiety.

INDIE ROCK

>>72977377
you're my only friend here.

>>72977377
Not only that he clearly just copied p4k's headline

>>72977377
that would be like saying "there was a car crash" when an angry driver rams their car into someone else's

>some buildings caught fire in downtown nyc
p4k headline abt 9/11

>>72977431
"car crash" implies accident. "explosion" doesn't.

A R E OL AS GR ANDE E
AREAOLA GRNADE
AREAOLA GRANDE
RALREAOS GRANDE
AREALS GRANDE
AREOALOS GRAND
AREAOLE GRANDE
GARNREAL GALREANDS

>>72977431
or like when the freddie gibbs news story said "sexual assualt" instead of "rape" like all of gira's and bright eyes and pwr bttm and modest mouse et ccc

what do you guys think good content guy looks like? what's his asl? is he circ'd?

sufjan planetarium is getting panned. they already used a track review to make fun of "saturn"

grizzly bear hasn't gotten a bnt

the national only got theirs bc they're headlining p4k paris

arcade fire is more of the same reflektor bullshit

beach house has they're cash grab b-side record. "chariot" was really good but no bnm

INDIE IS DED

>>72977450
no it literally doesn't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_collision

>>72977398
Does LCD Soundsystem count

>>72977019
im just here for the daddy issues deep dream 7.9 rare

>>72977599
no it isn't, WHITE indie is dead.

>>72977267
>godless
wew

>>72977630
7.8 or maybe a low bnm 8 but only for legacy/pity reasons. james is too fat and white and old to be cool anymore.

File: Capture+_2017-05-25-01-59-05.png (127KB, 1350x842px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1350x842px

>>72977627
are you retarded? do you not read the articles you link?

>>72977695
some muslim running ppl over on a bridge isn't a car accident is all the guy you're arguing with is saying

>>72977721
I never said it was

>>72977736
just like a bomb isn't an explosion

ZOE REVIEW
>H E R

File: 4987489.png (10KB, 294x116px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 294x116px

>>72977695
no, are YOU retarded? all traffic accidents are vehicle collisions but not all vehicle collisions are traffic accidents.

you are an absolute dunce, anon.

>>72977750
>an explosion caused by a bomb isn't an explosion
alright
>>72977770
see >>72977450

jayson greene is what i imagine everyone who posts about black music on /mu/ looks like

>>72977794
>>>72977770 (You)
>see >>72977450
see >>72977627

>>72977794
everyone here is autistic. using the word explosion but not bomb sanitizes the whole thing. smart phones explode. electric car batteries explode. sodas explode.

>>72977810
do you not know what the word "implies" mean
I'm not saying every car crash is an accident

>>72977820
That's a fair point. I think the article was posted before the cause of the explosion was made public, though.

>>72977810
>>72977431
>>72977770 (You)
>>see >>72977450
>>72977750
see
>>72977830

>>72977820
exactly. I guess that anon does not like my analogy because they have created their own separate definition of car crash that implies accident. Fucking retarded.

here's another:

that would be like saying "there was a fire" when someone intentionally started the fire. you are sanitizing the issue.

>>72977830
Yes, and you cannot replace the objective definition with your own.

>>72977872
>>72977891
>they have created their own separate definition of a car crash
if someone said "there was a car crash near my house" you wouldn't assume a fucking terrorist ran his car into a building, you retard
this isn't about the definition, it's about context

POST THE FUCKING SCORES

>>72977905
Maybe not a terrorist but it doesn't rule out intentional collision. Accident is more likely (especially if it's near your house), but it is still not an ""implication"". That assumption would be based on conjecture and not implication.

>>72977987
>Accident is more likely
Accident is MUCH more likely. That's why the implication is there. In the case of an explosion as big as the one in the Ariana concert, it's much more likely to be a terrorist attack, specially with terrorism being a recurring current issue. That's why the analogy is terrible.

>>72978041
>Accident is MUCH more likely.
I don't disagree, I'm talking about your diction.

>That's why the implication is there.
You are using the wrong word, anon. You mean assumption and yet you say implication.

>In the case of an explosion as big as the one in the Ariana concert, it's much more likely to be a terrorist attack, specially with terrorism being a recurring current issue. That's why the analogy is terrible.
Yet again, no. You are creating a false definition. Just stop embarrassing yourself.

>>72978121
>You mean assumption and yet you say implication.
Most people, when they read a headline with "car crash" in it, would assume the car crash was an accident. The news outlet knows that, so by putting "car crash" in a headline, they're either being morally dishonest it they're implying the car crash was an accident. "Implication" is the right word.
>You are creating a false definition.
see >>72977830 and >>72977905
I'm not defining anything. This is about what the news outlets wants to convey in a headline and what the reader gets from it.