Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
ITT: Artists who didn't develop their own sound 2017-05-25 12:24:24 Post No. 72973485
[Report] Image search: [Google]
ITT: Artists who didn't develop their own sound 2017-05-25 12:24:24 Post No. 72973485
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 220px-RutlesCD.jpg (21KB, 220x219px) Image search:
[Google]
21KB, 220x219px
ITT: Artists who didn't develop their own sound
Anonymous
2017-05-25 12:24:24
Post No. 72973485
[Report]
>>
>>72973485
I love these guys. Ouch, Cheese and Onions, and I Must Be In Love are their best.
>>
>>72973791
Cheese and Onions is better than anything those hacks the Beatles ever wrote
>>
>>72973814
C-H-E-E-S-E-A-N-D-O-N-I-O-N-S
UH HUH
>>
File: homepage_large.140bf2a7.jpg (107KB, 319x319px) Image search:
[Google]
107KB, 319x319px
>>
>>72973485
The fact that so many books still name The Rutles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art.
>>
>>72974151
>lusty negro attitudes
This sounds like it could be a line from The Rutles
>>
>>72973855
DUDE PSYCHEDELIC LOL
aussies can't make anything good
>>
File: the pains of being pure at heart.jpg (42KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 500x500px
>>
>>72973791
I always liked It's Looking Good and Goose Step Mama!
Get Up and Go Back Home sounds too much like a Beatles rip off for my liking though.
>>
>>72975008
This is one of those bands that sound good on the first listen, but immediately turn to generic shit after you download the album.
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3