>20+ minute song >ends with a fade out

File: Angry_Byrne.jpg (661KB, 1280x1688px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 1280x1688px

>>72910495
I fucking HATE this

File: 1495247822521.jpg (491KB, 2048x1308px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 2048x1308px

>>72910495
>20 minute song with 4 minute intervals of silence

Why do you fags hate fade outs so much? If the song's already climaxed there's literally nothing wrong with them

>>72910606
if the song is 20 mins+ I expect it to have a better way to end

>the fade out is recreated during live performances

>>72910606
fadeouts are almost always lazy and unsatisfying. give me a proper ending. what if you got a book and the pages just gradually lost their ink in the last chapter and you don't get to read a conclusion

>>72912497
"Lazy" in what way? I don't believe any fade out was made due to the musicians thinking a proper ending would have been just too exhausting to do

>>72912700
I'm pretty sure a lot of fade outs are used simply because they didn't know how to end the song

what about when a song does have an ending but it's a gapless album so it has some lead-in at the end after the song itself "ends"

>10+ minute song
>it ends and starts again multiple times

What about fade outs that connect to the next song somehow?

>>72912719
This is not true at all, btw.

>>72910495
Name ONE song like this.

>>72914603
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAMaCxw9Utw

>>72914603
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R_3mXZBsuU