>.mp3
>.mp3
F I G H T
It saves space
>.opus
>>72881825
why are there so many reaction images of this coal burner
why do you all watch so much of her porn
>.flac
>.flac instead of .alac
Imagine all the guys who wanted to talk to her and thought she was heaven sent, but they just never did of course.
>>72881868
it gets reactions because shes just cute enough while very whorish and aryan plus the signature blacked tint is bound to trigger someone. shitposting is truly an art
>>72881916
>Aryan
She's half Egyptian how retarded are you?
>>72881999
are you saying there's nary any aryan in her?
>>72881895
if they arent black they wouldnt have a chance anyways
>>72882037
Wut there's no such thing. You're either Aryan or not. Can you not detect hair dye?
>tracks 1-3 .mp3
>tracks 4-8 .m4a
>.wav
>>72881999
Actually some guy that went to high school with her on r9k confirmed she's not half egyptian.
>>72881825
>.mp3.exe
>>72883156
WOW how's some guy doing haven't talked to some guy in a long time cool guy some guy.
>>72883156
>some guy on r9k confirmed
well i'm some guy on mu and i can confirm thats bullshit
>>72883331
The guy was legit. He posted their graduation yearbook with a time stamp and everything.
>>72881825
I have 3000 songs on my phone. I had to buy a 64 GB micro SD card just to house my 320 kbps mp3s.
I'm not using flac.
>>72883451
>64 GB micro SD card
why not a 200 gb micro SD card
>cbr
>>72883827
I think my phone supports only up to 128 GB. And I'm not sure 3000 flac files could fit into that amount of space.
>>72883451
>320kbps
>not using v0
>.ape
>he doesn't hop in a time machine and listen to the band recording the song on spot
Shiggy diggy
>>72883947
It would sound like shit because studio recording needs to go through mixing.
>>72881868
Because she's a cute coal burner? Why the fuck else?
>>72883122
Holy shit that's awful.
memes aside, where is the best place to buy mp3 files?
>inb4 torrent
>>72884253
bandcamp has the highest cut going to the artist as far as i know, plus you can download flac or other file types if you want
>.wma
>>72883348
He wouldn't know her lineage, you fucking mongoloid.
>>72883947
>he doesn't hire the band to come to his house and play for him every time he wants to hear a song
>>72883927
>using v0
>>72881825
>not storing hundreds of 128kb .mp3 files on your 16gb sd
>>72885970
>not storing thouthands of 96kbps vorbis files on you sd card
>it's transparent unlike 128kbps mp3
>Just listening to music
>.midi
Just making a point, you don't like it? give me my joint!
And I can do what two men can, me and my oneman band.
>>72881825
>>.mp3
#sad
>.midi
>>72883180
>.mp3.src
>.ape
mp3 = best quality:size ratio
this is inarguable
>>72884161
How the fuck does it matter. Just listen to the music, stop being an autistic fuck
sum_41_in_too_deep_mp3.exe
>>72887285
But it isn't. AAC offers smaller file sizes while retaining the same quality.
>.aiff
>.ogg
>>72887391
GREENDAY_boulevard_of_broken_dreams_2004.mp3.bat
>new physical media for music storage that bridges the gaps between CD and download
autism
>.shn
>2GB 24b 96Khz vinyl rip
>>72887525
What would that even be? Flash storage of some kind?
>>72887728
Holy shit this.
Can the human ear even tell the difference? Vinyl isn't even a format capable of producing high fidelity sound accurately.
>>72887739
bands should just release music on cheap flash drives desu, would add value to the proposition of buying music. more premium releases could have fancier drives, etc
>>72887786
This is literally the opposite of the truth you retard
I make 320's out of flac get on my actual level
>>72887989
>CRACKLEcracklepopcracklepopPOPcrackleCRACKLEpop
>>72884090
>coal burner
>cute
kys
>>72881825
if all the music on my computer was in flac then I would have no space : (
>.L16
>>72885970
going to 320 kbps from 128 kbps and im not going back you can hear a difference
>>72889635
48khz or 44.1khz?
>not downloading youtube vids as mp3 and then converting them to FLAC
>>72890994
>not converting 128kbps to lossless
ZOOM AND ENHANCE
>>72881825
honestly this is the average sort of girl i wish i had been having one night stands with in college
nothing really noteworthy about her but it would be a good night of feeling like you're normal. i'd almost rather bang her than someone objectively prettier because at that point you're like "ok you're banging me but you're out of my league, what's your angle"
with this girl you're like "ok shes just horny like me, we're both average. cool"
anyway whats this thread about?
>>72890965
there's a difference?
>>72891077
yes
Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.
I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange…well don’t get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren’t stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you’ll be glad you did.
>>72891089
can you hear it?
>>72891132
stop posting this you are not funny
>>72891166
yes albeit its minor
>>72891181
not trying to be funny, it's just fact
>>72881825
That bitch got some eyebrows straight from yemen
>>72891261
well I can't. you must be 12
>>72891265
>fact
cool story
>>72891320
own better audio equipment you damn pleb if i knew you werer just some casual with $10 earbuds i wouldnt have said anything
>>72891132
thats not what lossy means
>>72891346
over ear. try harder kid
>>72891339
This is from a cd I ripped back when I bought it cause I'd just gotten a new 120GB drive. It used to be 256kbps because of transferring it to new hard-drives throughout the years it's quality has diminished quite a bit.
I can't be bothered re ripping it because I've grown a bit fond of the sound
>>72881999
Source?