post your favorite female artists

>>72845749
Fuck your contentless thread nigga

>>72845776
>being this uninvolved in new music
wew lad

File: 1488613995474.gif (1MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x270px

the one and only

>>72845776
gtfo nigga. nobody forced you to visit this thread.

none

>>72845815
sad

>>72845749
You already posted her. St Vincent is a close second though

>>72845860
whatever waifufag

>>72845936
great taste. do you like grimes, anon?

>>72846273
grimes!

>>72846027
I've only heard Art Angels. It was good but I thought it had some filler here and there. California and Kill v Maim are great though. Very memorable tracks.

>>72846314
do yourself a favor and check her older albums. you may be surprised. they're kinda different compared to art angels. try visions next.

a random song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb_0LzBv894

>>72846516
bork!

>>72846516
collab with grimes, when?

just imagine the possibilities.

Real question lads, how is paramore popular again?

They havent been relevant since the turn of the decade. Was it just the music or massive marketing?

>>72846693
because they released a good album, not hard to guess

>>72846678
she's working with Arca

>>72846693
they had successful singles

>>72846693
They released a good single that brought attention, and shortly after released a good album. Paramore is name that you don't really forget of, even if you're not a fan, so it doesn't matter that they were quite until now

>>72846693
>They havent been relevant since the turn of the decade.
you can't be serious. did you really miss their highly acclaimed self titled album from 2013? paramore turned into a new wave band and kinda left behind their pop punk roots.

look at the chart positions and sales of their s/t album compared to their older albums: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramore_discography#Studio_albums

they still sold a lot of albums despite the streaming services and bigger piracy. it's not like their popularity waned.

>>72846693
Ain't it Fun happened. It was a huge single for them.

>>72846693
underage fanbase with pocket money

>>72846873
> underage
I hate when people say this shit. It's just dumb. Teenage girls might have been into Paramore in 2007 but do you think teenagers are into them now? No, a few, sure, but you need to get with the times.

>>72846915
underage detected

>>72846945
Good post

>>72846723
i don't like arca. i prefer a collab with grimes.

File: paramore.jpg (304KB, 1452x1744px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1452x1744px

>>72846873
since when most underage fans are fans of sophisticated blondie-style new wave? because that's the new paramore: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yw-RPm1uOM4

2007 was 10 years ago, buddy. their older fans grew with the band and the band also got new fans. get with the times and leave your shitty stereotypes at the door.

>>72845749
there's something about her new look

File: 1.jpg (329KB, 1638x2048px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1638x2048px

>>72847361
she's cool as fuck

>>72847286
thanks for elaborating on my original point and not actually refuting it

>>72847476
>not actually refuting it
huh? are you insane? i btfo your shitty post. you pretended that their fanbase consist of "underage fanbase with pocket money" and forgot that this band is 13 y. o. and no more relevant to that age category (sure they still have underage fans, but it's not the majority anymore). even the original underage fans grew up (13 years is a lot of time).

now this band appeals to grown up people who dig new wave. add the people that grew up in the '80s to that group. deal with it.

>>72847470
that girl seems depressed to me and i have no idea why