What is the optimal number of members for a band ?
stupid question
enough members to produce the sound you want to create with the instruments you want to incorporate
Four
5
>>72626161
Looks like he's already got the answer
>>72626161
dumb question.
depends in the band itself.
>>72626161
3-5
>>72626161
3 to 5. 2 is a maybe depending on the quality of their live performance. 5 is only acceptable if including a keyboard player. Over 5 is bad because it allows for a dedicated brass/woodwind/viola style member, which always looks stupid.
4 members is best, imo (pic related)
>Rhythm Guitar/Vocals
>Lead Guitarist
>Bass/Vocals
>Drums
>>72626161
69
or 420
3-5 with far being the best. However, if the music requires a lot of layers of instrumentation like mid to late period beach boys, then as many as necessary.
>>72626177
>>72626178
>>72626183
>>72626275
>>72626318
die.
>>72626360
Was this funny in your head you stupid teenager
>>72626360
xDDDD
>>72626633
Of course gramps, is it funny when you can't get up of the toilet
>>72626360
hahaha
>>72626318
this
dubs and 4 is the best number for a band
4 is the patrician number of band members:
>1 guitarist (can also play keyboards occasionally)
>1 bassist (can also play keyboards occasionally)
>1 drummer
>1 singer (can also play guitar and/or keyboards occasionally)
>>72626693
Another really funny post. Bravo
2 = gay
3 = qt
4 = solid
5 = gay
6 or more = super gay
>>72627029
Oh and
1 = autistic/sad
>>72627087
1 = look at me i'm electro producer!
2 = we don't need bassist
3 = patrician classic
4 = plebeian classic
5 = we have a blunt vocalist who does not know how to play guitar
6 and more = bitches you a jazz bigband or something?
9
>>72627029
This
>>72626904
Checked.
>>72626318
>Not 1000 drummers
Fag
>>72626360
Underage b&
>>72626318
>dedicated brass/woodwind/viola style member
>looks stupid
die
>>72626161
3-5