prove this isn't the greatest british album of all time

prove it is

>>72603480
Listen to it

>>72603505
groundbreaking sound, catchy songs, phenomenal instrumentation, timeless, proof that a band can be good with a shitty lead singer, i am the resurrection is enough to put it up there.

>>72603480
the fact that it is just a mediocre pop album with a few extra pedals used that normies overhype because they think it was the first of its kind.

there are hundreds better.

>>72603520
oasis are decent but don't have the same replayability value

>>72603552
Name any bands that sound like Stone Roses

Genuinely I want to find one

File: 2779.jpg.jpg (19KB, 280x280px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 280x280px

>

>>72603698
christ, not even close.

>>72603689
pro tip

>he can't

>>72603725
Kill yourself my man

>>72603480
>songs with only one good song

>>72603774
what does this even mean

>>72603797
It means you're a newfriend

>>72603480
Mondays > Roses

>>72603984
having seen them both i can tell you right now the mondays did NOT age well

(did dance with bez to step on which was a personal highlight for me)

>>72604007
For sure but back in the day

>>72603984
I don't believe you

the mondays are iconic but the stone roses were far superior musicians

>>72603480
>>72603520
dadrock

>>72603698
Correct

>>72603725
Biggest faggot on /mu/

>>72603480
The Prodigy - Experience exists.

>>72604265
Ladrock*