1 - dub techno
2 - Detroit techno
3 - acid techno
4 - minimal techno
5 - industrial techno
50 - IDM
999 - hardcore techno
9999 - freetekno
>>72586247
>edm fan doesn't like idm
I'm not surprised desu
>>72586298
>unironically using EDM as a catch-all
This board is cringe af
-1. happy hardcore from Rotterdam around 1996
>>72586349
this
>>72586247
Where's the gabber?
>>72586334
>grouping IDM all together and then complaining about the EDM label being cringey
God damn EDM fans are mongoloids.
i'd agree with idm's placement if it weren't for autechre...and industrial techno is pretty shit
>>72586371
Industrial in general is pretty shitty
>>72586360
Best forgotten desu
>>72586371
There's some nice industrial/dub crossover on the comeup
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeVI87FXatc
>>72586247
Basic Channel suck
What's the difference between dub and minimal?
I've checked out some dub essentials and a lot of it just seems to be weird noises, without even a beat.
>>72586495
Minimal is minimal, dub is dubby
dub techno is the shoegaze of techno much like mbv is the only shoegaze band worth listening to basic channel is the only dub techno band worth listening to
>no french house music
>>72586718
That's because that would be house music, not techno
The clues in the name
>>72586527
what is it with 4chan and basic channel? its not that great lmao
>>72586766
blame rym
Anyone know where i can download this? Also what you guys think about this album?
>>72586756
It's all EDM. It's all corporate pop shit dude.
>>72586822
Epic
>>72586527
...how much have you actually listened to?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqJ9jB6q0NU
>>72586834
Don't you fuckers get it?
The entire genre of electronica is commercial, all electronica is EDM, as it's objectively inferior/cheaper music. It's our degenerate plebeian /mu/ that has tried to make us believe EDM is an "essential" genre and that if you don't like it you must be "narrow-minded", a "rockist" who listens exclusively to "twings and twangs" and there's probably some racial element to it too. EDM music has no staying power. All of EDM is just a neo-disco sub-genre of top-40 pop, with a "mechanical" paint job. This music doesn't stand the test of time, it's a fad. That's why EDM producers are discussed about like fashion. Image/fashion/numbers sold are actually considered when talking about them. EDM is just a really cheap/lazy form of music anyways. The majority of EDM beats are just stealing (MUHH "SAMPLING") another artist's music, looping it over a generic drumbeat while someone throws preset synths over it. The "technical aspects" of EDM are not hard at all. That's why there's 14 year old white girls on YouTube uploading themselves mixing with ease and speed, dropping polyrhythms like it's nothing. But because they don't fit the image of a "EDM fan", no one would take seriously. I've listened to it all from backpacker shit like Basic Channel and Deepchord to the "golden days" of Derrick May and Frankie Knuckles to revival stuff like Mall Grab and Delroy Edwards to the 90s with 4hero and Omi Trio to the CLT approved Mouse on Mars and Autechre to today like DJ Rashad and DJ Spinn. All electronica is EDM. All of it. Stop spamming it. Either keep it contained into one threads or request a containment board. I'm sick of coming on /mu/ and seeing a million DJ Rashad threads (none of which are about music btw).
>>72586844
Yes, yes *yawn*
>>72586527
what do you even know about dub techno
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlVp6b2Qdks
>>72586247
Detroit is better than dub
>>72586527
DELET
>>72586247
>no electro
>>72586495
Dub is murky and "quiet" but with heavy atmosphere and usually basslines.
Minimal usually still sounds like normal techno, but with very little going on other than a kick
>>72586408
NEVER 4GET
NEVER 4GIVE
>basic channel is the only dub techno band worth listening to
Yeah and Deepchord, Fluxion, Monolake, Deadbeat, Porter Ricks, Vladislav Delay, early Andy Stott, Shed etc.
>>72586247
What about ambient techno?
>>72587028
pretty much all ambient techno falls under the minimal techno umbrella, although the reverse isn't true
>>72587028
Echospace used to get spammed loads here one time
>>72586368
Exactly.
>>72586927
>>72587047
So what's the diference between ambient techno and dub techno?
>>72587168
ambient techno can stray pretty far from the roots of the genre, generally the bass is really uniform and soft in the mix, the synths are less bouncy and more soundscapeish
two of the most popular examples for comparison:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYjwFNUoD-Y
(ambient)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi4vzEoJXHU
(dub)
>>72586247
This guy seems familiar
>>72587238
>>72587238
Thanks for the clear up. I'd suppose Pop barely even fits into the techno tag, at least not like Zauberberg or Königsforst.
>>72587386
yeah, zauberberg for sure is more like a dark ambient affair
have you listened to burger/ink? minimal techno project wolfgang voigt is involved in, less ambient, more techno
>>72587454
I've listened to burger/ink. I'm actually very familiar with Voigt's work. I just didn't get what the genre tags meant too well. What's your favorite album from him?
You can check the pics of my personal ratings if you're interested.
>>72587547
pop as well ha. my ratings would pretty much mirror yours. ever listened to 154?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_V_0zoqluSg
>>72587547
>pop is highest rated
ugh
>>72586247
1. minimal
2. acid
3. idm
4. dub
5. detroit
6. ambient
7. industrial
...
every other style of bleep
99999999999999999999. tech house
>>72587574
Never heard of him but this is great, thanks! do u have an rym profile?
>>72587585
Yeah whatever. I know that Königsforst is superior but I have a deeper conneciton with Pop