What are your opinions on Scaruffi, anon?

File: c5eed01a961f40b7c06d0428b81b5709.jpg (98KB, 770x1217px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 770x1217px

>>72535799
>not appreciating AFX enough
ultimate pleb

6/10 would have best suited a career in gynecology

THE

>>72535843
FACT

>>72535852
THAT

>>72535852
THAT

>>72535866
SO

also, a tin teardrop

>>72535867
SO

people who take him seriously should feel very badly about themselves

THE

apparently he has an obsession with putting a ton of his opinions on a website

>>72535932
y tho

>>72536027
what kind of fucking losers would go out of their way to voice their music opinions on the internet?

>>72535799
as six-sentence paragraphs, his reviews would be masterpieces

italian pasta

>>72535799
What's he's most consistently high-rated artist? Might be Hendrix but im not sure

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-30 at 6.04.30 PM.png (66KB, 509x231px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 509x231px

>>72536382
Dalek. I think their average is the slightest bit higher than Hendrix.

>>72536434
fucking fanboy

>>72536448
I'm stating facts retard.

>>72536382
Fugazi's fairly consistent as i expected, no actual poor ratings are found here
>>72536457
wew lad

>>72536382
>>72536434
Slint has an average of 8 but it's only two albums so maybe that's not what you're looking for

>>72536503
Blind?

>>72536512
Also The Pop Group have only one 8 and one 9

>>72535799
Fucking pedo

>>72536146
y-you mean l-like anonymous?
wew
wouldn't want to be piero right about now

>>72536528
korn

>>72535932
he was right about trout mask replica, at least

>>72535932

t. angsty teenage radiohead fan

>>72536598
Proof? He's the type of fag that defends cuckery

>>72536146
He voices political opinions that are literally false

6/10

>>72536434
The Doors has the same average

>>72536434
Nico's average is very slightly higher than 7

>>72538473
Velvet Underground has exact same average, what a coincidence

>>72538505
>>72538473
And Husker Du is slightly higher than that at 7.125

>>72535799
very judgmental man

>>72538597
I would say judicious

>>72536203
>>72538302
oh VERY FUNNY

>>72535932
This. He has proven his bias many times and written so many demonstrable lies and falsehoods that anyone who takes his opinion as anything more than a novelty really should think about why they are following the opinion of a proven fraud. Not to mention the litany of behaviours that he demonstrates that would imply he suffers from a mental disability.

>>72536084
see above

>>72537651
debateable

>>72537905
don't even like radiohead

>>72535799
The fact that so many people still name Scaruffi as “the greatest or most significant or most influential” music reviewer ever only tells you how far music criticism still is from becoming a serious art.

>>72538800
Which things did he lie about?

I like to hate him, but I've discovered too many beloved artists from him to not give him some respect.

>>72538800
He's literally psychopathic and he hates his own race with a driving passion

>>72538917
>This old article by Piero Scaruffi has won several international awards as the most professional analysis of the career of pop group the Beatles ever written.
This claim is made at the beginning of his Beatles review. Note that none of these "international awards" have ever surfaced, and it is doubtful they even exist.

>While the interests of the author have long left popular music behind, the vast success of the article makes him believe it should continue to be posted here.
This is demonstrably false as he continues to listen too and write reviews on new pop artists such as Beyonce.

>Recipient of an NMC AWARD FOR MUSIC TASTE
No organization such as the NMC (New Music Central) has ever surfaced, let alone one that awards such a title.

These are just a few off the top of my head. I am leaving out notable lies made in his (embarrassing) political writings as well.

>>72539111
Lmfao

>>72539111
I thought he was being tongue-in-cheek there

>>72539216
Are you being tongue-in-cheek here?

>>72539111
That NMC thing has been up there since 1998 at the latest. See if you can navigate this dead website on archive.org and find it: https://web-beta.archive.org/web/19990220054211/http://www.newmusiccentral.com:80/index2.htm