1960s: The Beatles
1970s: Pink Floyd
1980s: The Smiths?
1990s: Nirvana
2000s: Radiohead
2010s: ???
The Cure > The Smiths
>>72521687
There's no band significant enough to define the 2010s.
In terms of individuals probably Kendrick Lamar.
this is only hard because kanye isn't a band
>>72521717
How about Tame Impala?
1960s: James Brown
1970s: Can
1980s: Grandmaster Flash
1990s: The Prodigy
2000s: Burial
2010s: Kanye West
1960s - The Beatles
1970s - David Bowie
1980s - Prince
1990s - Stone Roses
2000s - Arctic Monkeys
2010s - The 1975
>2000s
>Radiohead
lol, 2000 was dominated by nu-metal.
>>72521727
yes, tame impala is as well known as radiohead, nirvana or pink floyd
>>72523277
*Ukgarage and dubstep
This is Euro hours
>>72521743
You fucking wish
>>72521687
Fuck Nirvana and The Smiths
2010s is Meme Grips or Tame Impala
1960s: The Beatles
1970s: Pink Floyd
1980s: Michael Jackson
1990s: Kanye West
2000s: Nirvana
2010s: Young Thug
>The Beatles
>Pink Floyd
>U2
>Radiohead
>Arctic Monkey
>Tame Impala
60s - Nina Simone / The Beatles
70s - Led Zeppelin / Kraftwerk
80s - New Order / Kate Bush
90s - Pixies / A Tribe Called Quest
00s - Eminem / Arcade Fire
10s - Kendrick Lamar / Kanye West
I'm indecisive.
I didn't necessarily go for the best of each decade, but just for the ones I thought better reflected on the type of music being made at that point. The sort of music that had to be made in that decade and nowhere else, if you know what a mean. A combination of talent, timing and, importantly, popularity.
>>72524371
this one is good except I think you made a typo and put Nirvana and Kanye the wrong way round.