/mu/core general

loveless is mediocore
AOTS is shit
Kid A is an overrated snorefest
All your rap is forgettable shit and the albums are 10 million years long
You don't actually like TMR
MPP is alright, but very repetitive


The only good /mu/core is Pet Sounds, Remain in Light, and ITCOTCK,

File: SEETHING.jpg (35KB, 475x546px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 475x546px

>>72519892
>/mu/cucks will disagree with this

>>72519846
While nothing in /mu/core is ear-piercingly awful, >>72519892 is more or less accurate.

File: 1475915018744.png (1MB, 703x716px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 703x716px

can this just be a shoegaze thread instead

>>72519892
all except the first two are correct

>>72519892
LOVELESS IS MEDIOCRE AS SHIT THANK THE FUCKING GODS SOMEONE AGREES WITH ME. literally the only album where people will literally forgive the most dogshit song structures and lyrics because DEWD IT SOUNDS LIKE AN EXPLOSION OF BUTTERFLIES .

>>72520263
>song structures
people have been composing in strophic form for ages

>>72520263
Loveless is literally too deep for you. I'm sorry.

>>72520305
care to give ANY example from the album? or would a coherent explanation take away the deepness babe

>>72520340
*example of how deep the album is

>>72519846
Sorry to say but >>72519892 is slightly correct, at least in regards to loveless. I like loveless, it's a cool album and I listen to it every now and then because I do enjoy shoegaze as a whole, but it is mediocre.

>>72519892
>loveless is mediocore
>AOTS is shit
>Kid A is an overrated snorefest
thank you

>>72520305
>muh glorified pop album is too deep for you

>>72520360
>>72519892
Oh fuck, I didn't realize he also listed a bunch of other things I don't like. Yeah OP, this guy is 100% dead on. Except I don't like Pet Sounds, Remain in Light, or ITCOTCK

Why be mad about not liking how one popular album sounds? Just listen to something else.

best: loveless, itcotck, ril
worst: okc, kid a, mpp

the rest are ok

>>72519846
Soundtracks For The Blind is the only upper-echelon /mu/core album that is worthy of more than one listen

>>72520742
>insipid rock album
>insipid ambient album
it has a cool idea, but the album itself is mediocre at best

Trout Mask Replica is a great album

Pet Sounds and Loveless are 10s

The rest range from 2-9.5/10

>>72520919
if you think it's insipid, you're either deeply cynical, dumb, or you're offering insight without understanding the album. the fact that you posit it as some synthesis of ambient and rock music inclines me to believe that the third condition applies to you (it's not ambient - not at all). the album is flawless and thematically rich. my proclamation was an exaggeration, so I won't try to defend it, but the album is far from mediocre

>>72521464
>if you don't like this insipid album you're dumb
stopped reading there

File: 1491381326970.png (9KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 256x256px

>>72519892

>>72520263
>explosion of butterflys
duuude

>>72520555
trips of truth