Worst album covers

File: file.png (2MB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1024x1024px

Don't worry pal Nas has always had shit tier taste.

>>72518817
What the fuck happened to him? Just in general.

>>72518768
Funny that this came right after Technique, which had a super cool cover.

>>72518768
holy fuck

please tell me peter saville had no part in this abortion

>>72518826
He currently only exists strictly to provide fire guests verses on Rick Ross and DJ Khaled songs

>>72518839
Funnier still that they were both designed by the same guy.

File: weed too loud.jpg (68KB, 706x706px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 706x706px

>>72518870
>>72518867
what in the fuck

did he have a stroke

>>72518906
the 90s did strange things to everyone

>>72518768
see i hated this cover at first but now i love it. peter saville used stock images to create it. and it uses the registered copyright symbol. its a comment on commercialism

File: IMG_0292.jpg (20KB, 256x197px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 256x197px

>>72518877
>bad

File: accelerator.jpg (143KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1200x1200px

what am i looking at

>>72519803
it must've seemed edgier back then than it is now

File: IMG_1339.jpg (21KB, 185x273px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 185x273px

>>72519418

>>72519418
I own that chair

File: IMG_1113.jpg (11KB, 250x193px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 250x193px

>>72519883
Thats an ugly ass chair anon

File: 0004139962_10.jpg (223KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 900x900px

holy fucking jesus

File: titanomaquia.jpg (12KB, 338x336px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 338x336px

Honestly, this album is actually really great and a hidden gem of post-punk and alt-rock, but this album's cover is so bad it actually came in a garbage bag as a wrap.

File: 7c9a07e01c883800e7d687bde6d6f849.500x500x1.jpg (23KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x500px

convince me this isnt a shit album cover because after TMS this is such a shit meme

>>72519998
What's not to like?

>>72519829

Actually great

File: 220px-AutechreTriRepetae.png (1KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 220x220px

obligatory

>>72521297
I never understood what was bad about this

File: 6862-tri-repetae.jpg (31KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x500px

>>72522512
that's a great cover though

especially with the artist sticker it's so damn aesthetic

File: damn original.png (2MB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x1200px

>>72519897

File: japs.png (66KB, 690x215px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 690x215px

How did they drop the ball so hard?

>>72522728
The artist refused credit on this because the cover art that was used on the album was just a knock-up that he sent over to show the basic idea of what the cover would look like and he was going to build off of it into a much more detailed cover. The label or whoever just said "thanks, we'll use that" and stuck the WiP cover on the album.

Dream Theater

Every single one of their covers.

>>72523334
yeah it reflects pretty well on their music

>>72523155
It was the band that liked it so much that they used it, not just someone at the label. That's what makes it even more cringey.

>>72518877
you are wrong