no comment

Way too high

>>72473498
How can one man be so based?

>>72473498
too high?

>>72473498
He's probably gonna give BP 6.5

That's spot on except Exmilitary should be a 5.

He doesn't like DG. Its okay, they're not for everyone.

>>72473498
So this is where the Exmilitary is best meme comes from

exmilitary is better than tms to be fair

>>72473498
Those are exactly my scores except all of them are 1 point higher. He's mostly correct.

the daily 'either DG fans are hidden in the woodworks or we're all pretending to hate them' thread

NLDW is one of their most popular, but are there ANY critics that like it the most?

File: Capture.jpg (26KB, 680x100px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 680x100px

Derp Shits BTFO

>>72473612
dg average is still way higher

>>72473591
NLDW is clearly the weakest of the first 3, and i dont think there are any highly regarded critics that rate any of the later works higher than their earliest

>>72473638
s-shut up!!

>>72473642
really? i honestly will NEVER understand the hype for the money store. just me personally, but i always thought that when NLDW is good it's way better than TMS. both have 2-4 songs that i skip almost every time. but to each his own!

>>72473679
Get the fuck out of this thread or I'll suck your cock and tell everyone you're gay.

>>72473642
Exmilitary is probably the weakest of the first 3. It has the fewest songs I'd consider alltime great Death Grips songs for sure.

>>72473707
The Money Store was probably Flatlander at his absolute peak. The beats on the first 3 tracks alone were absolutely unreal.

>>72473556
haah waaw

>>72473701
that basically makes today is the day the greatest metal band of all times according to piero

>>72473701
Sadness Will Prevail is so fucking good

>Scaruffi still hasn't changed his shitty website's web 1.0 design5
for what purpose

>>72473498
Pretty accurate

File: italianamerican-software-consultant-and-reviewer-piero-scaruffi-on-picture-id631381222[1].jpg (24KB, 450x612px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 450x612px

Damn he is old

>>72473871
>type o negative

>>72474114
a band of a single 9 and a 7 is not better than a band of basically five 8s

I could be wrong but he probably thought NOTM was a joke or else it should've been the highest considering it's easily their best

>>72473498
Damn, Scaruffi is actually right for once

>>72473701
oh wow didn't know about that

>>72474164
Scruffy is never actually wrong, only plebs think he is

why does he love debut albums so much?

>>72474260
Imagine actually thinking this lmao

>>72474136
>the only metal band Scaruffi has ever given a 9 to

>>72474265
He values innovation, so an objective improvement over a debut that doesn't innovate as much will usually get a lower score.

>>72474291
Imagine being this in denial lmao

>>72473498
Please, just keep posting this over and over.

>>72473498
PORCO DIO PIERO

>>72473556
>inb4 he gives Humanz a 7

why do you allow your opinions to be swayed by a pretentious critic, as opposed to your own subjective experience to the album?

>>72473498
shit he properly scales his rating system!!! what a bad!!!!

>>72474260
i mostly disagree with him on releases from this decade and the last
(Impossible Nothing is not an 8)

otherwise, he's pretty on-point

File: Capture.png (69KB, 387x605px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 387x605px

>>72475677
JUST

File: beach boys accurate ratings.png (53KB, 652x482px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 652x482px

CUT MY LIFE INTO PIECES

>>72476004
He gave their best albums 7s so whatever

>>72475677
>>72475738
Is their more recent stuff really that bad?

>>72475677
Exit 4/10, fuck off

File: s.png (89KB, 628x396px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 628x396px

>>72475677
tfw klaus schulze made better albums than tangerine dream

>>72473556
This is true though

>>72473997
There is a reason: He believes anyone from around the world on any level of Internet access should be able to see his website. It's a noble goal though I wonder if sacrificing accessibility is worth it.

>>72477495
plus these modern websites look like shit

I don't always agree with him but he's the only reviewer I know that actually uses an out of ten scale the correct way.

>>72477565
and what is the correct way?

>>72473997
>shitting on web 1.0
Choke to death

>>72474265
Unless a band goes through a major stylistic shift the debut album is almost always better. At least to me debuts often have a soul to them later work is lacking.

>people getting triggered by scruffy's numerical ratings again.

They are literally irrelevant, the written reviews and opinions are far more insightful.

>>72477646
<4=shit
4-6=mediocre
>6=good

>>72477495
if you're advanced enough to have internet in the year two thousand and seventeen then you can run fucking web 2.0

>>72477646
The problem I have is that people often give a score of 8 to something they only consider decent, and 7 to things they consider mediocre. 8s should only be given to things that are really good, verging on great, with 7s going to things that are good enough to be recommendable. 9 is reserved for great masterpieces, and 10 is a perfect score that should only be given to a very small proportion of what you listen to.